Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 27
2 The Next Decade of Earth Observations from Space Chapter 1 outlines the components of an Earth information system to address recognized national needs for Earth system science research and applications to benefit society. In this chapter, the committee describes the observational portion of a strategy for obtaining over the next decade an integrated set of space-based measurements essential to such a system—one that will extend our ability to address the increasingly urgent issues we face as inhabitants of Earth. Although they are but one part of the requisite Earth information system, space-based measurements provide unique and key data for analyzing Earth as a global system of interconnected human activities and natural processes. With the development of a resilient and effective Earth information system, the recommended observations will strengthen the global Earth system science framework for informing decision making to address emerging regional and global challenges, including the following: Changing ice sheets and sea level. Will there be catastrophic collapse of the major ice sheets, including those of Greenland and West Antarctic and, if so, how rapidly will this occur? What will be the time patterns of sea-level rise as a result? Large-scale and persistent shifts in precipitation and water availability. Will droughts become more widespread in the western United States, Australia, and sub-Saharan Africa? How will this affect the patterns of wildfires? How will reduced amounts of snowfall change the needs for water storage? Transcontinental air pollution. How will continuing economic development affect the production of air pollutants, and how will these pollutants be transported across oceans and continents? How are these pollutants transformed during the transport process? Shifts in ecosystem structure and function in response to climate change. How will coastal and ocean ecosystems respond to changes in physical forcing, particularly those subject to intense human harvesting? How will the boreal forest shift as temperature and precipitation change at high latitudes? What will be the impacts on animal migration patterns and on the prevalence of invasive species? Human health and climate change. Will previously rare diseases become common? How will mosquito-borne viruses spread with changes in rainfall and drought? Can we better predict the outbreak
OCR for page 28
of avian flu? What are the health impacts of an expanded ozone hole (Figure 2.1) that could result from a cooling of the stratosphere, which would be associated with climate change? Extreme events, including severe storms, heat waves, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions. Will tropical cyclones and heat waves become more frequent and more intense? Are major fault systems nearing the release of stress via strong earthquakes? While past investments in Earth remote sensing have provided spectacular advances, such as in the accuracy of weather predictions, the above list of challenges highlights the class of new, interrelated questions being asked by the public and policy makers as they seek to understand new risks and the vulner-abilities of a rapidly evolving Earth system. Additional issues and questions will emerge from continued system-level study of Earth. The next 20 years must bring a new level of integration in the understanding of Earth-system components. The Earth observation plan presented here distills into a core set of space-based missions many of the key measurements needed across the range of interrelated societal challenges and Earth science areas shown in Figure 2.2. Building on lessons learned from the development and use of the current fleet of space-based instruments, the committee’s recommended set of well-defined and justified missions will FIGURE 2.1 The 2006 hole in the Antarctic ozone layer was the most serious on record, exceeding that of 2000. It was the largest not only in surface area (matching that of 2000), but also in mass deficit, meaning that there was less ozone over the Antarctic than ever previously measured. SOURCE: NASA and ESA satellite data; see “Total Ozone Map, 2006/09/05,” available at http://www.theozonehole.com/ozonehole2006.htm. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Canada, 2007.
OCR for page 29
FIGURE 2.2 Addressing any given societal challenge requires scientific progress in many Earth system areas, as shown in these examples. Colored squares represent the scientific themes that contribute substantially to each of the selected benefit areas. provide critical new observations and data for addressing emerging societal issues and for enabling major advances in scientific understanding. The recommended missions address what are considered to be the highest-priority observational needs. To avoid the technical and cost problems associated with overly ambitious missions, the plan limits the instrument set on any mission to one that can deliver clear synergies between observations. In time, it may prove necessary to consider alternative institutional arrangements for executing these inherently multidiscipline, multiagency missions. In particular, as the plans of other space-faring nations and organizations crystallize, their contributions to meeting observational needs will have to be carefully evaluated. Articulated in the next section are the key elements of the current Earth-observing system that are essential components of the observation system for the next decade.
OCR for page 30
SETTING THE FOUNDATION: OBSERVATIONS IN THE CURRENT DECADE Over the past 40 years, the U.S. civilian agencies have built an increasingly capable space-based Earth-observing system. NOAA has continued to deploy and maintain an operational system of weather satellites and expand the utility of these observations (Box 2.1). In 2004, NASA completed deployment of its ambitious Earth Observing System (EOS) research fleet consisting of three multi-instrumented spacecraft (Terra, Aqua, and Aura) designed to characterize most of the major Earth system components. NASA also complemented EOS with several smaller, more focused missions and instruments (on international partner spacecraft) that extended capability related to weather and climate. In addition, USGS and NASA have continued their collaboration on ecosystem science and related societal benefit areas through the Landsat mission series. The result of these efforts has been a steadily increasing number of space-based observa- BOX 2.1 EMERGING APPLICATIONS USING POES AND GOES OPERATIONAL MEASUREMENTS In addition to its primary role in weather forecasting, NOAA has been working with other agencies and institutions to create operational data products that support capabilities in areas of benefit to society such as fire detection and air quality monitoring. Fire Detection Monitoring wildfires is a difficult task in parts of the world that have high levels of biological diversity in remote locations. The Center for Applied Biodiversity at Conservation International, in collaboration with the University of Maryland, uses data from the MODIS Rapid Response System1 to provide an e-mail alert system that warns of fires in or near protected areas. The service is available at no cost by subscription.2 For the past 10 years the Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison has used the GOES series of satellites to monitor fires and smoke in the Western Hemisphere. Multispectral GOES-8 imagery (visible, and at 3.9, 10.7, and 12 µm) is used to identify and catalog fire activity in South America associated with deforestation, grassland management, and agriculture. This effort has yielded the Automated Biomass Burning Algorithm (ABBA).3 In 2002, NOAA’s Satellite Products and Services Review Board approved the transition from preoperational to operational status of the Wildfire Automated Biomass Burning Algorithm (WF-ABBA) data product. Air Quality Monitoring Air NOW is a government program that involves the EPA, NOAA, NASA, the National Park Service, the news media, and tribal, state, and local agencies.4 The program reports conditions for ozone and particulate pollution to provide the public with easy access to daily air quality index (AQI) forecasts and real-time air quality conditions for more than 300 cities. USA Today is also an Air NOW partner. The University of Maryland, Baltimore County, operates an air quality Web site, “The Smog Blog,”5 with daily posts and NASA satellite images, EPA data, and so on. There have been more than 3 million hits over 2 years, about 15,000 visits per month, and about 800 unique visitors per week, including EPA, NASA, NOAA, and the states. 1See http://maps.geog.umd.edu. 2See “Fire Alert Fact Sheet.” 3See cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/burn/detection.html. 4See http://airnow.gov. 5See alg.umbc.edu/usaq.
OCR for page 31
tions currently provided by 29 operating spacecraft and 122 instruments (including both U.S. missions and international missions with U.S. instruments; for lists of missions and instruments, see CEOS, 2002). That will constitute the high-water mark in observing capability unless the United States alters course immediately (Figures 2.3 and 2.4). The extensive scientific and societal contributions of the NOAA-NASA-USGS satellite observing capabilities are evidenced by the thousands of scientific publications and applications of the data for environmental forecasts, a record of accomplishment mentioned in Chapter 1 and detailed with numerous examples in Part III of this report. As noted in Chapter 1, perhaps the largest impact of space-based observations to date has been improved weather forecasting and the many societal benefits stemming from that capability (Hollingsworth et al., 2005). The National Weather Service’s current practice of providing 10-day weather forecasts is a familiar reminder of the scientific gains made in the past decade. Space-based observations have also figured prominently in climate research (NRC, 2004). Factors that drive climate change are usefully separated into forcings and feedbacks. A climate forcing is an energy imbalance imposed on the climate system externally or by human activities. Examples include changes in solar energy output, volcanic emissions, deliberate land modification, and anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases, aerosols, and their precursors. A climate feedback is an internal climate process that amplifies or dampens the climate response to a specific forcing. An example is the increase in atmospheric water vapor that is triggered by warming due to rising carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, which acts to further amplify the warming because of the greenhouse properties of water vapor. Observations of key climate forcings and feedbacks, diagnostics (e.g., temperature, sea level), and the consequences of climate change (e.g., sea ice decrease) have helped to identify potentially dangerous changes in Earth’s climate. These observations have catalyzed climate research and enabled substantial improvements in climate models. In fact, these improvements have brought into existence a class of Earth system models1 that couple atmosphere, ocean, land, and cryosphere systems. These models not only provide better estimates of spatially and temporally resolved patterns of climate change but also provide a basis for addressing other environmental challenges, such as changes in biogeochemical cycles of carbon and nitrogen and the effects of these changes now and in the future (Figure 2.5). Despite these advances, the extraordinary foundation of global observations is in decline. Between 2006 and the end of the decade, the number of operating sensors and instruments will likely decrease by around 40 percent, given that most satellites in NASA’s current fleet are well past their nominal lifetimes. Furthermore, the replacement sensors on the National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS), when they exist, are generally less capable than their EOS counterparts. This decreased quantity of space-borne assets will persist into the early part of the next decade (see Figures 2.3 and 2.4). Partly causing and certainly amplifying the observational collapse of space-based measurements is the decline in NASA’s Earth science budget. From 2000 to 2006, this part of NASA’s budget decreased by more than 30 percent when adjusted for inflation (Figure 2.6). This reduction, if it persists, translates to approximately $4 billion less to develop Earth science missions over the next decade. That decrease could mean, for example, some 8 to 12 fewer space-based research missions and perhaps $1 billion less for associated research and analysis. The NASA-NOAA EOS satellite system, launched beginning in the late 1990s, is aging, and the existing plan for the future is entirely inadequate to meet the coming challenges. The NOAA budget has been growing (see Figure 2.7), but this growth is now swamped by the large cost overruns in the NPOESS 1 For example, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory and National Center for Atmospheric Research Earth system models (see www.cgd.ucar.edu/research/models/ccsm.html).
OCR for page 32
FIGURE 2.3 Number of U.S. space-based Earth observation missions in the current decade. An emphasis on climate and weather is evident, as is a decline in the number of missions near the end of the decade. For the period from 2007 to 2010, missions were generally assumed to operate for 4 years past their nominal lifetimes. Most of the missions were deemed to contribute at least slightly to human health issues, and so health is not presented as a separate category. SOURCE: Information from NASA and NOAA Web sites for mission durations. FIGURE 2.4 Number of U.S. space-based Earth Observation instruments in the current decade. An emphasis on climate and weather is evident, as is a decline in the number of instruments near the end of the decade. For the period from 2007 to 2010, missions were generally assumed to operate for 4 years past their nominal lifetimes. Most of the missions were deemed to contribute at least slightly to human health issues, and so health is not presented as a separate category. SOURCE: Information from NASA and NOAA Web sites for mission durations.
OCR for page 33
FIGURE 2.5 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) future scenario runs with the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s CCSM3 show abrupt transitions in September sea ice cover. In the most dramatic event, shown here, the ice cover goes in a decade from conditions similar to those observed in the 1990s to essentially September ice-free conditions. This change is driven by a number of factors: the thinning of the ice cover to a more vulnerable state; increases in Arctic ocean heat transport, which possibly trigger the event; and the albedo feedback, which accelerates the ice retreat. SOURCE: M.M.Holland, C.M.Bitz, and B.Tremblay, 2006, Future abrupt reductions in the summer Arctic sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33:L23503, doi:10.1029/2006GL028024. Copyright 2006 American Geophysical Union. Reproduced by permission of American Geophysical Union.
OCR for page 34
FIGURE 2.6 NASA budget for Earth science research and applications demonstrations, 1996 to 2012 (in fixed FY 2006 dollars). FIGURE 2.7 NOAA NESDIS budget for Earth science applications and research, 1996 to 2012 (in fixed FY 2006 dollars).
OCR for page 35
program. It also appears likely that the GOES-R program will experience cost growth.2 Completing even the descoped NPOESS program will require several billion dollars beyond the funding planned as recently as December 2005.3 Thus, NPOESS represents a major lien on future budgets, one that is so great that the agency’s ability to provide observations in support of climate research or other noncore missions will be severely compromised. Among the many missions expected to cease over the next few years, the committee has identified several in NOAA and NASA that are providing critical information now and that need to be sustained into the next decade—both to continue important time series and to provide the foundation necessary for the recommended future observations. In NOAA, many observational capabilities need to be restored to NPOESS, but this topic must be considered as part of a reexamination of the logic, costs, and benefits of the current (September 2006) NPOESS and GOES-R plan. The reexamination of NPOESS and GOES-R will be conducted by a fast-track NRC study to be conducted and concluded in 2007. The present committee’s analysis of the implications of NPOESS instrument descopes and cancellations is hampered by the absence of information about changes in key sensors. In particular, the Conical-Scanning Microwave Imager/Sounder (CMIS) instrument on NPOESS, which was to have provided continuity of records of sea-surface temperature and sea ice—time series critical to global climate studies—has been canceled, and the specifications for its replacement, the Microwave Imager/Sounder (MIS), are not yet known.4 Similarly, the mitigation plan for the now-demanifested altimeter, ALT, is not yet known. The continuity of several measurements is of sufficient importance to climate research, ozone monitoring, or operational weather systems to deserve immediate attention. Those for climate include total solar irradiance and Earth radiation; for ozone, ozone limb sounding capability and total solar irradiance; and for weather, sea-surface vector winds and temperature and water vapor soundings from geostationary and polar orbits. As detailed in the committee’s interim report (NRC, 2005), the substitution of passive microwave sensor data for active scatterometry data would worsen El Niño and hurricane forecasts and weather forecasts in coastal areas.5 Nevertheless, given the precarious status of existing surface wind measurements,6 it is imperative that a measurement capability, such as the one on MetOp, be available to prevent a data gap when the NASA QuikSCAT mission terminates. 2 See testimony of Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere VADM Conrad C.Lautenbacher, USN (Ret.) before the House Committee on Science (Chairman Sherwood Boehlert, R-NY) on the GAO GOES-R report, September 29, 2006. Available at http://www.legislative.noaa.gov/Testimony/lautenbacher092906.pdf. 3 See testimony of Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere VADM Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., USN (Ret.) before the House Committee on Science (Chairman Sherwood Boehlert, R-NY) on the results of the Nunn-McCurdy Certification Review of the National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS), June 8, 2006. Available at http://www.legislative.noaa.gov/Testimony/lautenbacher060806.pdf. 4 CMIS was also to provide measurements of sea-surface vector winds and all-weather profiles of atmospheric temperature and humidity. It also had important capabilities for measurement of soil moisture and precipitation. See “NPOESS ERA Microwave Imager,” presentation at a NOAA conference in Silver Spring, Md., on October 26, 2006, available at http://www.ipo.noaa.gov/polarmax/2006/day03/5.5Kunkee_20061001_PolarMax_MIS_v2.ppt. 5 The passive system does not provide useful wind direction for winds of 5 meters per second or less (the scatterometer threshold is 2 meters per second). Moreover, wind-direction errors for winds at 6 to 8 meters per second (the wind-speed range that forces ENSO events) will be double those of the active scatterometer. The median global wind speed is about 7 meters per second, which suggests that a passive system will not provide reliable information on direction for about half the winds. In addition, rain and land contamination of wind vectors will be greater with a passive system than with a scatterometer and thus limits their use in forecasts of hurricanes and weather in coastal regions. See presentations at a NASA/NOAA workshop, “Satellite Measurements of Ocean Vector Winds: Present Capabilities and Future Trends,” Florida International University, Miami, Fla., February 8–10, 2005, available at http://cioss.coas.oregonstate.edu/CIOSS/workshops/miami_meeting/Agenda.html. 6 NRC (2005), pp. 19–20.
OCR for page 36
Recommendation:7 NOAA should restore several key climate, environmental, and weather observation capabilities to its planned NPOESS and GOES-R8 missions; namely: Measurements of ocean vector winds and all-weather sea-surface temperatures descoped from the NPOESS C1 launch should be restored to provide continuity until the CMIS replacement is operational on NPOESS C2 and higher-quality active scatterometer measurements (from XOVWM, described in Table 2.1) can be undertaken later in the next decade. The limb sounding capability of the Ozone Monitoring and Profiling Suite (OMPS) on NPOESS should be restored.9 The committee also recommends that NOAA: Ensure the continuity of measurements of Earth’s radiation budget (ERB) and total solar irradiance (TSI) through the period when the NPOESS spacecraft will be in orbit by: Incorporating on the NPOESS Preparatory Project (NPP)10 spacecraft the existing “spare” CERES instrument, and, if possible, a TSI sensor, and Incorporating these or similar instruments on the NPOESS spacecraft that will follow NPP, or ensuring that measurements of TSI and ERB are obtained by other means. Develop a strategy to restore the previously planned capability to make high-temporal and high-vertical-resolution measurements of temperature and water vapor from geosynchronous orbit. The high-temporal- and high-vertical-resolution measurements of temperature and water vapor from geosynchronous orbit were originally to be delivered by the Hyperspectral Environmental Sensor (HES) on the GOES-R spacecraft. Recognizing the technological challenges and accompanying potential for growth in acquisition costs for HES, the committee recommends consideration of the following approaches: Working with NASA, complete the GIFTS instrument, deliver it to orbit via a cost-effective launch and spacecraft opportunity, and evaluate its potential to be a prototype for the HES instrument, and/or Extend the HES study contracts focusing on cost-effective approaches to achieving essential sounding capabilities to be flown in the GOES-R time frame. 7 Inaccurate wording of this four-part recommendation in the initially released prepublication copy of this report was subsequently corrected by the committee to reflect its intent to recommend a capability for ensuring continuity of the ongoing record of measurements of total solar irradiance and of Earth’s radiation budget. As explained in the description of the CLARREO mission in Chapter 4, the committee recommends that the CERES Earth radiation budget instrument and a total solar irradiance sensor be flown on the NPP satellite and that these instruments or their equivalent be carried on the NPOESS spacecraft or another suitable platform. 8 GOES-R is the designation for the next generation of geostationary operational environmental satellites (GOES). See http://osd.goes.noaa.gov/ and http://goespoes.gsfc.nasa.gov/goes/spacecraft/r_spacecraft.html. The first launch of the GOES-R series satellite was recently delayed from the 2012 time frame to December 2014. 9 Without this capability, no national or international ozone-profiling capability will exist after the EOS Aura mission ends in 2010. This capability is key to monitoring ozone-layer recovery in the next two decades and is part of NOAA’s mandate through the Clean Air Act. 10 The NASA-managed NPOESS Preparatory Project (NPP), a joint mission involving NASA and the NPOESS Integrated Program Office (IPO), has a twofold purpose: (1) to provide continuity for a selected set of calibrated observations with the existing Earth Observation System measurements for Earth science research and (2) to provide risk reduction for four of the key sensors that will fly on NPOESS, as well as the command and data-handling system. The earliest launch set for NPP is now September 2009, a delay of nearly 3 years from the plans that existed prior to the 2006 Nunn-McCurdy certification. See http://jointmission.gsfc.nasa.gov/ and http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/1 50011 main_NASA_Testimony_for_NPOESS-FINAL.pdf.
OCR for page 37
The committee believes that such a process will both strengthen the technological foundation of GEO-based soundings and provide the requisite experience for efficient operational implementation of GEO-based soundings. It notes that this issue will be studied in more detail as part of the NRC fast-track study scheduled for 2007. Finally, although there are many concerns about NASA’s out-year budget, two topics deserve particular mention. One is changing global precipitation patterns resulting from changing climate. The other is changing patterns of land use due to the needs of a growing population, the expansion and contraction of economies, and the intensification of agriculture. Both concerns have been highlighted in the scientific and policy literature (e.g., IPCC, 2001; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005) and were addressed in the committee’s interim report (NRC, 2005). The committee believes that it is vital to maintain global precipitation measurements as offered by the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission, and to continue to document biosphere changes indicated by measurements made from instruments on the Landsat series of spacecraft. Recommendation: NASA should ensure continuity of measurements of precipitation and land cover by: Launching the GPM mission in or before 2012, and Securing before 2012 a replacement for collection of Landsat 7 data. The committee also recommends that NASA continue to seek cost-effective, innovative means for obtaining information on land cover change. By maintaining sustained measurements of these key climate and weather variables, the nation will be in a good position to achieve the integrated Earth information system envisioned by the committee for the next decade. The set of observational missions that will help to deliver that vision is described in the next section. NEW OBSERVATIONS FOR THE NEXT DECADE A prioritized set of missions forms the core recommendation of this report. In establishing the set, the committee recognized that a successful program is more than the sum of its parts. The priority-setting method was designed to achieve a robust, integrated program—one that does not crumble if one or several missions in the prioritized list are removed or delayed or if the mission list must evolve to accommodate changing needs. The method was also intended to enable augmentation of an enhanced program if additional resources become available beyond those anticipated by the committee. Robustness depends on the strength of the overall program, not on the particular missions on the list. It is the range of observations that must be protected rather than the individual missions themselves. Recommendation: In addition to implementing the re-baselined NPOESS and GOES program and completing research missions currently in development, NASA and NOAA should undertake the set of 17 missions11 recommended in Tables 2.1 and 2.2 comprising low-cost (<$300 million), medium-cost ($300 million to $600 million), and large-cost ($600 million to $900 million) missions and phased appro- 11 One mission, CLARREO, has two components—a NASA component and a separate NOAA component.
OCR for page 50
FIGURE 2.14 Recommended missions supporting extreme-event warnings.
OCR for page 51
FIGURE 2.15 Recommended missions supporting human health.
OCR for page 52
FIGURE 2.16 Recommended missions supporting earthquake early warning.
OCR for page 53
FIGURE 2.17 Recommended missions supporting improved weather prediction capability.
OCR for page 54
FIGURE 2.18 Recommended missions supporting prediction of sea-level rise.
OCR for page 55
FIGURE 2.19 Recommended missions supporting climate prediction.
OCR for page 56
FIGURE 2.20 Recommended missions supporting water resource management for freshwater availability.
OCR for page 57
FIGURE 2.21 Recommended missions supporting ecosystem services.
OCR for page 58
FIGURE 2.22 Recommended missions supporting air quality monitoring and pollution management.
OCR for page 59
committee recognizes not only the need to learn from implementation of the 1 7 recommended missions but also the need to efficiently transition select research observations to operational status and the need to create space-based observing opportunities aimed at fostering new science leaders and revolutionary ideas. In light of those objectives the committee makes the following recommendation: Recommendation: U.S. civil space agencies should aggressively pursue technology development that supports the missions recommended in Tables 2.1 and 2.2; plan for transitions to continue demonstrably useful research observations on a sustained, or operational, basis; and foster innovative space-based concepts. In particular: NASA should increase investment in both mission-focused and cross-cutting technology development in order to decrease technical risk in the recommended missions and promote cost reduction across multiple missions. Early technology-focused investments through extended mission Phase A studies are essential. To restore more frequent launch opportunities and to facilitate the demonstration of innovative ideas and higher-risk technologies, NASA should create a new Venture class of low-cost research and application missions (~$100 million to $200 million). These missions should focus on fostering revolutionary innovation and on training future leaders of space-based Earth science and applications. NOAA should increase investment in identifying and facilitating the transition of demonstrably useful research observations to operational use. The Venture class of missions, in particular, would replace and be very different from the current ESSP mission line, which is increasingly a competitive means for implementing NASA’s strategic missions. Priority would be given to cost-effective, innovative missions rather than those with excessive scientific and technological requirements. The Venture class could include stand-alone missions that use simple, small instruments, spacecraft, and launch vehicles; more complex instruments of opportunity flown on partner spacecraft and launch vehicles; or complex sets of instruments flown on suitable suborbital platforms to address focused sets of scientific questions. These missions could focus on establishing new research avenues or on demonstrating key application-oriented measurements. Key to the success of such a program will be maintaining a steady stream of opportunities for community participation in the development of innovative ideas, which requires that strict schedule and cost guidelines be enforced for the program participants. REFERENCES CEOS (Committee on Earth Observation Satellites). 2002. Earth Observation Handbook. European Space Agency, Paris, France. GCOS (Global Climate Observing System). 2003. The Second Report on the Adequacy of the Global Observing Systems for Climate in Support of the UNFCCC. GCOS-82. WMO/TD No. 1143. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. GCOS. 2004. Implementation Plan for the Global Observing System for Climate in Support of the UNFCC. GCOS-92. WMO/TD 1219. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. GCOS. 2006a. Systematic Observation Requirements for Satellite-Based Products for Climate. GCOS-107. WMO/TD No. 1338. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. GCOS. 2006b. CEOS response to the GCOS Implementation Plan September 2006. Satellite Observations of the Climate System. GCOS Steering Committee, Session XIV, Geneva, Switzerland, 10–12 October, 2006, GCOS SC-XIV Doc. 17, Item 7.2. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Hollingsworth, A., S.Uppala, E.Klinker, D.Burridge, F.Vitart, J.Onvlee, J.W.De Vries, A.De Roo, and C.Pfrang. 2005. The transformation of Earth-system observations into information of socio-economic value in GEOSS. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 131:3493–3512. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
OCR for page 60
JROC (Joint Requirements Oversight Council). 2001. NPOESS Integrated Operational Requirements Document (IORD) II. December. Available at http://www.osd.noaa.gov/rpsi/IORDII_011402.pdf. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Synthesis.aspx. NRC (National Research Council). 2003. The Sun to the Earth—and Beyond: A Decadal Research Strategy in Solar and Space Physics. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. NRC. 2004. Climate Data Records from Environmental Satellites: Interim Report. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. NRC. 2005. Earth Science and Applications from Space: Urgent Needs and Opportunities to Serve the Nation. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2005. Implementation Plan for Evolution of Space and Surface-Based Sub-Systems of the GOS. WMO/TD No. 1267. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Representative terms from entire chapter: