Barnhart JA. 2005. Social Security’s Proposed Improvements to the Disability Determination Process. Statement of Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security before the Subcommittee on Social Security of the House Committee on Ways and Means, September 27, 2005. Available: waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp?formmode=view&id=3802 (accessed September 29, 2005).

Barzansky B. 2005. Personal communication by electronic mail on November 14. Barbara Barzansky is Associate Director, Division of Undergraduate Medical Education Policy and Standards, and Secretary, Council on Medical Education, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL.

Bloch F. 1992. Disability Determination: The Administrative Process and the Role of Medical Personnel. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Bloch F, Lubbers J, Verkuil P. 2003. Introducing Nonadversarial Government Representatives to Improve the Record for Decision in Social Security Disability Decisions. Report to the Social Security Advisory Board. Available: www.ssab.gov/documents/Bloch-Lubbers-Verkuil.pdf (accessed October 7, 2005).

Brennan TA, Horwitz RI, Duffy, FD, Cassel CK, Goode LD, Lipner RS. 2004. The Role ofThe Role of Physician Specialty Board Certification Status in the Quality Movement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(9):1038-1043.

Canadian Parliament. 2003. Listening to Canadians: A First View of the Future of the Canada Pension Plan Disability Program. Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, June. Available: www.parl.gc.ca/infocomdoc/37/2/HUMA/Studies/Reports/humarp05/humarp05-e.pdf (accessed April 12, 2005).

Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB. 2005. Systematic Review: The Relationship between Clinical Experience and Quality of Health Care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 142(4):260-273.

CPP/OAS (Canada Pension Plan/Old Age Security). 2004. Review Tribunals Biennial Report: 2002-2004. Ottawa, Ontario: Office of the Commissioner of Review Tribunals, Canada Pension Plan/Old Age Security. Available: www.reviewtribunals.gc.ca/pubs/bi_rpt2004/toc_e.html (accessed April 12, 2005).

Demeter SL. 2003. Contrasting the Standard, Impairment, and Disability Examination and Report. Pp. 101-107 in Demeter SL, Andersson GBJ, eds. Disability Evaluation, 2nd Ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

Demeter SL, Washington RJ. 2003. The Disability Evaluation and Report. Pp. 625-639 in De-meter SL, Andersson GBJ, eds. Disability Evaluation, 2nd Ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

DHHS (Department of Health and Human Services). 2002. Projected Supply, Demand, and Shortages of Registered Nurses: 2000-2020. National Center for Health Workforce Analysis, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available: bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/reports/rnproject/report.htm#chart2 (accessed November 10, 2005).

GAO (General Accountability Office). 2003. SSA Disability Decision Making: Additional Steps Needed to Ensure Accuracy and Fairness of Decisions at the Hearing Level. GAO-04-14. November 12. Available: www.gao.gov/new.items/d0414.pdf (accessed July 25, 2005).

GAO. 2004. Social Security Administration: More Effort Needed to Assess Consistency of Disability Decisions. GAO-04-656. July 2. Available: www.gao.gov/new.items/d04656.pdf (accessed July 25, 2005).

Geiringer SR. 2000. Independent Medical Evaluation. Pp. 241-256 in Rondinelli RD, Katz RT, eds. Impairment Rating and Disability Evaluation. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

Himmelstein JS, Pransky GS, Sweet CP. 2000. Ability to Work and the Evaluation of Disability. Pp. 257-274 in Levy BS, Wegman DH, eds. Occupational Health: Recognizing



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement