Clark, W. C., J. van Eijndhoven, and N. M. Dickson. 2001. Option Assessment in Global Environmental Risk Management. In Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks: Volume II, A Functional Analysis of Social Response to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain. Social Learning Group (Ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Cohen, S. J. 1997. Scientist-stakeholder collaboration in integrated assessment of climate change: Lessons from a case study of Northwest Canada. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2:281-293.

Corell, R.W. 2006. Presentation to the committee, March 30.

CRS (Congressional Research Service). 1990. Mission to Planet Earth and the U.S. Global Change Research Program. CRS Report for Congress, 90-972.

Cubasch, U., B. D. Santer, A. Hellbach, G. Hegerl, H. Höck, E. Maier-Reimer, U. Mikolajewicz, A. Stössel, and R. Voss. 1994. Monte Carlo climate change forecasts with a global coupled ocean-atmosphere model. Climate Dynamics 10:1-19.

Cvetkovich, G., M. Siegrist, R. Murray, and S. Tragesser. 2002. New information and social trust: Asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers. Risk Analysis 22(2): 359-367.

De Groot, M. 1970. Optimal Statistical Decision. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Dietz, T. 2001. Thinking about environmental conflict. Pp. 31-54 in Celebrating Scholarship. L. Kadous (Ed.). Fairfax, Va.: George Mason University.

Dietz, T. 2003. What is a good decision? Criteria for environmental decision making. Human Ecology Review 10:60-67.

Dietz, T., P. C. Stern, and R. W. Rycroft. 1989. Definitions of conflict and the legitimation of resources: The case of environmental risk. Sociological Forum 4:47-70.

Earle, T. C., and G. T. Cvetkovich. 1995. Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.

Easterling, W. E. 1997. Why regional studies are needed in the development of fullscale integrated assessment modeling of global change processes. Global Environmental Change 7:337-356.

Edwards, P. N., and S. Schneider. 2001. Self-governance and peer review in science-for-policy: The case of the IPCC Second Assessment Report. In Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. C. Miller and P. N. Edwards (Eds.). Cam-Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Enquete Kommission. 1988. Vorsorge zum Schutz der Erdatmosphäre. Bonn, Enquete Kommission “Vorsorge zum Schutz der Erdatmosphäre” des 11. Deutscher Bundestag.

Enquete Kommission. 1991. Protecting the Earth—A Status Report with Recommendations for a New Energy Policy. Third Report of the Enquete Commission of the German Bundestag Preventive Measures to Protect the Earth’s Atmosphere. Volume 2. Bonn, Germany: Deutscher Bundestag.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006. Available at Accessed July 2, 2006.

Farrell, A. E., S. D. VanDeveer, and J. Jager. 2001. Environmental assessments: Four underappreciated elements of design. Global Environmental Change 11:311-333.

Farrell, A. E., J. Jager, and S. D. VanDeveer. 2006. Overview: Understanding design choices. In Assessments of Regional and Global Environmental Risks. Designing Processes for the Effective Use of Science in Decisionmaking. A. E. Farrell and J. Jager (Eds). Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

Fussel, H., and R. J. T. Klein. 2006. Climate change vulnerability assessments: An evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change 75: 301-329.

GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office). 1990. Global Warming: Administration Approach Cautious Pending Validation of Threat. NSIAD-90-63. January 8, Washington, D.C.

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement