National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

About | Ordering | New

Menu menu

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$21.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program's Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.2, "Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Climate Decision Making" (2007)
Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (BASC)

Citation Manager

. "References." Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program's Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.2, "Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Climate Decision Making". Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan
Page
24
bottomleft bottomright
  E-mail
Share on facebook Facebook
Share on delicious Delicious
Share on stumbleupon Stumble
Share on twitter Twitter
More Sharing ServicesMore

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.

Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program’s Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.2, “Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Climate Decision Making”

Mosteller, F and C. Yountz. 1990. Quantifying probabilitsic expressions (with discussion). Statistical Science 5: 2-34.

NRC (National Research Council). 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2004. Implementing Climate and Global Change Research: A Review of the Final U.S. Climate Change Science Program Strategic Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

Peters, E., P. Slovic, and R. Gregory. 2003. The role of affect in the WTA/WTP disparity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16: 309-330.

Peters, E., D. Västfjäll, T. Gärling, and P. Slovic. 2006. Affect and decision making: A “hot” topic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 79-85.

Slovic, P. 2006. Affect, reason, risk and rationality. European Working Group “Multicriteria Aid for Decisions”, 3(13), 1-5.

Slovic, P., E. Peters, M.L. Finucane, and D.G. MacGregor. 2005. Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology 24: S35-S40.

Slovic, P. 2004. What's fear got to do with it? It's affect we need to worry about. Missouri Law Review 69: 971-990.

Slovic, P., M. Finucane, E. Peters, and D.G. MacGregor. 2004. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis 24(2): 1-12.

Slovic, S., and P. Slovic. 2004/2005. Numbers and nerves: Toward an affective apprehension of environmental risk. Whole Terrain 13: 14-18.

Sunstein, C. R. 2005. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, M. and S. Rayner. 1998. Cultural discourses. In: Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 1: The Societal Framework. Pp. 265-344. S. Rayner and E.L. Malone (eds.). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.

Vaughn, D. 1996. Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wilson, R. S., and J. L. Arvai. 2006. When less is more: How affect influences preferences when comparing low and high-risk options. Journal of Risk Research 9:165-178.

Zajonc, R. B. 1980. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 35:151-175.

 Page
24