National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$21.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Review of Chemical Agent Secondary Waste Disposal and Regulatory Requirements (2007)
Board on Army Science and Technology (BAST)

Citation Manager

. "4 Closure Wastes." Review of Chemical Agent Secondary Waste Disposal and Regulatory Requirements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
59
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Review of Chemical Agent Secondary Waste Disposal and Regulatory Requirements

CLOSURE WASTES FROM BASELINE INCINERATION FACILITIES

The closure wastes at JACADS included significant amounts of legacy wastes that were generated during operations and stored awaiting disposal at the end of the munitions disposal campaigns. At the five currently operating disposal sites, much of this waste is being managed and disposed of during the operations phase and therefore will not be part of the closure. Other than the wastes from operations, the material generated during closure of the four baseline sites will be similar in type and quantity to those generated at JACADS with two notable exceptions, which are discussed below.

Definitive estimates of the quantities and methods for disposal of closure wastes had not been finalized by the Army when this report was being prepared. However, rough projections of waste that will be generated during closure were available. These are summarized in Tables 4-1 and 4-2. The ultimate end use of each site

TABLE 4-1 Projected Waste Quantities Generated During Closure According to Vapor Screening Levels

 

Total Across All Sites (tons)a

Secondary Waste Stream

Above VSLs

Below VSLs

Spent carbon from filters

741

154

Containerized combustible solids

45

2

Containerized miscellaneous solids

30

40

Containerized DPE/PPE/TAPb gear

500

69

Metals

469

3,326

Bulk solids: concrete and soilsc

1,670

803

Subtotal solids

3,455

4,394

Spent decontamination solution

3,944

0

Miscellaneous liquids

14

3

Subtotal liquids

3,958

3

Total

7,413

4,397

aSite managements’ best estimates as of January 2007.

bDPE, demilitarization protective ensemble; PPE, personal protective equipment; TAP gear, protective clothing made mostly of butyl rubber.

cFinal end state for bulk solid wastes at the Anniston Chemical Agent Disposal Facility (ANCDF) and NECDF is yet to be determined, so these two sites are not included in estimate.

SOURCE: Personal communication between Raj Malhotra, CMA Deputy, Technical Support Directorate, and Billy Williams, NRC study director, December 11, 2006.

TABLE 4-2 Projected Total Waste Quantities Generated During Closure (tons)a

Secondary Waste Stream

ANCDF

PBCDF

UMCDF

TOCDF

NECDF

Total Across All Sites

Spent carbon from filters

160

161

275

220

79

895

Containerized combustible solids

45

2

 

 

 

47

Containerized miscellaneous solids

 

1

2

2

65

70

Containerized DPE/PPE/TAPb gear

145

27

126

167

104

569

Metals

469

1,285

878

878

285

3,795

Bulk solids: concrete and soilsc

 

803

835

835

 

2,473

Subtotal solids

819

2,279

2,116

2,102

533

7,849

Spent decontamination solution

1,202

0

1,371

1,371

 

3,944

Miscellaneous liquids

0

1

6

6

4

17

Subtotal liquids

1,202

1

1,377

1,377

4

3,961

Total

2,021

2,280

3,493

3,479

537

11,810

aSite managements’ best estimates as of January 2007.

bDPE, demilitarization protective ensemble; PPE, personal protective equipment; TAP gear, protective clothing made mostly of butyl rubber.

cFinal end state for ANCDF and NECDF is yet to be determined, so it is not possible to estimate the quantities of bulk solids for these two sites.

SOURCE: Personal communication between Raj Malhotra, CMA Deputy, Technical Support Directorate, and Billy Williams, NRC study director, December 11, 2006.

Page
59