National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$22.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Ready, Set, SCIENCE!: Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms (2007)
Board on Science Education (BOSE)
Center for Education (CFE)

Citation Manager

Michaels, Sarah, Shouse, Andrew W., Schweingruber, Heidi A.. "7 Learning from Science Investigations." Ready, Set, SCIENCE!: Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
133
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Ready, Set, Science!: Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms

tigations.2 The IQWST units are designed to teach both scientific principles and the scientific practices of constructing and defending explanations by providing students and teachers with a framework that clearly defines this complex practice. The framework includes three components:

  • Claim:

What happened, and why did it happen?

  • Evidence:

What information or data support the claim?

  • Reasoning:

What justification shows why the data count as evidence to support the claim?

Thus, the curriculum helps students make sense of the phenomena under study (claim), articulate that understanding (evidence), and defend that understanding to their peers (reasoning).

As described earlier, part of the Struggle for Survival unit includes a two-week project in which students investigate a database holding information about the finch population on the Galapagos Islands. Students work in pairs in order to interpret the computer data and determine why so many finches died during the dry season of 1977 and why some were able to survive. The scientifically supported explanations for this question use data to identify which trait variations enabled birds to differentially survive the drought. For example, one response could state that the birds that survived the drought had longer beaks, which enabled them to crack the harder seeds that also survived the drought. Another plausible argument consistent with the data (but scientifically less accurate) could be that the birds that weighed more had fat stores that made them better able to survive the food shortage resulting from the drought.

Below is an excerpt from a student group presentation in which students use the claim-evidence-reasoning framework to reflect on their analysis and explain their current thinking about the investigation.

Evan:

“Again, the question we had through this entire project, which does not have one simple answer, is: in 1977, why did 40 percent of the finch population die in Daphne Major in the Galapagos Islands, and why did the ones that survive, survive? This is our report. I’m Evan, this is Leona, and this is Nelly. Here we go.”

Leona:

[Reading from a poster] “We have a few theories. In concluding our research concerning the study of finches on the island, our focus is to find out why the population of finches on that

Page
133