National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 3 Barriers to Quality Improvement and Quality Improvement Research
Suggested Citation:"4 Opportunities." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Advancing Quality Improvement Research: Challenges and Opportunities: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11884.
×

4
Opportunities

The many barriers described in the previous section can be translated into areas of opportunity for quality improvement research. As Scott Young of Kaiser’s Care Management Institute noted, future quality improvement efforts will need to take into account improvements in care for those with multiple chronic conditions, transitions in care, new technologies, robust evidence-based medicine, and innovative care environments.

SHORT TERM

There are a number of concrete actions that can be taken to make quality improvement and quality improvement studies better in the short term. One area of focus, for example, is the development of an evidence base. And as Frank Davidoff of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement said, managing the heterogeneity of research will require that the goals of quality improvement projects be more focused. Heterogeneity cannot be ignored, but there are ways to control it within the constraints of the real world. Adapting a lesson from randomized trial advocate Tom Chalmers, Davidoff proposed quality improvement interventions be assessed using the most rigorous methods possible immediately after the intervention has been introduced. In this way, the strength of study results may increase due to the ability to randomize.

Suggested Citation:"4 Opportunities." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Advancing Quality Improvement Research: Challenges and Opportunities: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11884.
×

Additionally, randomized controlled trials should build on previous work that characterized context and intervention development, Batalden said. The gap between technical knowledge limits and the needs of the particular applications of knowledge must be bridged.

The focus of quality improvement projects should also be clarified, suggested Davidoff. Projects often do not distinguish between the goals of determining the efficacy of the clinical intervention itself and of assessing the effectiveness of the care system in delivering the intervention. Different types of evidence may be required for the different goals, Davidoff noted. With a greater emphasis on clearly defining the focus of studies, the field could produce useful, generalizable knowledge that is actually needed, Grimshaw said.

Understanding the ethical issues is also an important, tangible change that can help improve the state of quality improvement research, Davidoff said.

LONG TERM

One long-term solution to improving quality improvement and quality improvement research would be to provide training in research methods to people doing work in quality improvement, Davidoff suggested. This could help fix the aforementioned mismatch between training and practice. Davidoff also noted that changes should be made to professional education. Examples of such changes would include teaching collaborative skills, training physicians in the manner that health care should be delivered, and encouraging provider partnerships.

Academic and editorial cultures also need to change in order for quality improvement and quality improvement research to develop. These stakeholders need to recognize the social and intellectual values of quality improvement work, Davidoff said. Other opportunities include learning more about experiential learning and leveraging other research disciplines. Davidoff noted that other research disciplines, such as social sciences and economics, could be useful in moving forward. One important step in achieving this could be recognizing that quality improvement research, as an interdisciplinary field, will require special attention, Pincus noted.

THE IMPORTANCE OF STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE

Strategies should be developed to take action on these opportunities, Pincus said. He proposed six strategies to help advance

Suggested Citation:"4 Opportunities." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Advancing Quality Improvement Research: Challenges and Opportunities: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11884.
×

quality improvement research: an infusion of new dollars, diversification of funding sources, creation of institutional homes for quality improvement research, recognition of the need for diverse strategies for different audiences, exposure to future researchers at multiple and early points in academic development, and enhancement of data about what strategies are most effective in engaging investigators and developing substantial programs. While these strategies are all important, a prioritization was not offered. Indeed, as Titler noted, because of the complexity of the health care system and the often conflicting needs of various stakeholders, it is extremely difficult to prioritize among strategies to develop quality improvement and quality improvement research.

Suggested Citation:"4 Opportunities." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Advancing Quality Improvement Research: Challenges and Opportunities: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11884.
×
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"4 Opportunities." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Advancing Quality Improvement Research: Challenges and Opportunities: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11884.
×
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"4 Opportunities." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Advancing Quality Improvement Research: Challenges and Opportunities: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11884.
×
Page 39
Next: 5 General Reactions »
Advancing Quality Improvement Research: Challenges and Opportunities: Workshop Summary Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Institute of Medicine's Forum on the Science of Health Care Quality Improvement and Implementation held a workshop on January 16, 2007, in Washington, DC. The workshop had its roots in an earlier forum meeting when forum members discussed what is meant by the terms "quality improvement" and "implementation science" and became convinced that they mean different things to different people. At the time, the members also discussed the need to identify barriers to quality improvement research and to implementation science. Thus the purpose of this workshop was to bring people together from various arenas to discuss what quality improvement is, and what barriers exist in the health care industry to quality improvement and also to research about quality improvement.

The summary that ensues is thus limited to the presentations and discussions during the workshop itself. We realize that there is a broader scope of issues pertaining to this subject area but are unable to address them in this summary document.

The workshop's first session was devoted to experiences that various institutions have had with quality improvement. Recognizing the wealth of experiences available outside of health care services, the workshop included presenters from outside the health care service industry as well as from inside. This includes discussions from a variety of perspectives: non-health care services, health plans, hospitals, and nursing. Advancing Quality Improvement Research: Challenges and opportunities - Workshop Summary describes the events of the workshop.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!