DECADAL SCIENCE STRATEGY SURVEYS

REPORT OF A WORKSHOP

Jack D. Fellows, Rapporteur

Joseph K. Alexander, Editor

Space Studies Board

Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop DECADAL SCIENCE STRATEGY SURVEYS REPORT OF A WORKSHOP Jack D. Fellows, Rapporteur Joseph K. Alexander, Editor Space Studies Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. This study was supported by Contract NASW-01001 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Contract DG133R04C00009 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and private funding from the National Research Council. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agencies that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-10664-1 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-10664-8 Copies of this report are available free of charge from Space Studies Board National Research Council 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu. Copyright 2007 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Wm. A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Wm. A. Wulf are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. www.national-academies.org

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop Other Reports of the Space Studies Board Earth Science and Applications from Space: National Imperatives for the Next Decade and Beyond (2007) Exploring Organic Environments in the Solar System (Space Studies Board [SSB] with the Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology, 2007) A Performance Assessment of NASA’s Astrophysics Program (SSB with the Board on Physics and Astronomy, 2007) An Assessment of Balance in NASA’s Science Programs (2006) Assessment of NASA’s Mars Architecture 2007-2016 (2006) Assessment of Planetary Protection Requirements for Venus Missions: Letter Report (2006) Distributed Arrays of Small Instruments for Solar-Terrestrial Research: Report of a Workshop (2006) Issues Affecting the Future of the U.S. Space Science and Engineering Workforce (SSB with the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board [ASEB], 2006) Review of NASA’s 2006 Draft Science Plan: Letter Report (2006) The Scientific Context for Exploration of the Moon—Interim Report (2006) Space Radiation Hazards and the Vision for Space Exploration (2006) The Astrophysical Context of Life (SSB with the Board on Life Sciences, 2005) Earth Science and Applications from Space: Urgent Needs and Opportunities to Serve the Nation (2005) Extending the Effective Lifetimes of Earth Observing Research Missions (2005) Preventing the Forward Contamination of Mars (2005) Principal-Investigator-Led Missions in the Space Sciences (2005) Priorities in Space Science Enabled by Nuclear Power and Propulsion (SSB with ASEB, 2005) Review of Goals and Plans for NASA’s Space and Earth Sciences (2005) Review of NASA Plans for the International Space Station (2005) Science in NASA’s Vision for Space Exploration (2005) Limited copies of these reports are available free of charge from Space Studies Board National Research Council The Keck Center of the National Academies 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20001 (202) 334-3477/ssb@nas.edu www.nationalacademies.org/ssb/ssb.html NOTE: Listed according to year of approval for release, which in some cases precedes the year of publication.

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop PLANNING COMMITTEE FOR THE DECADAL SCIENCE STRATEGY SURVEYS WORKSHOP LENNARD A. FISK, University of Michigan, Chair CHARLES L. BENNETT, Johns Hopkins University BERRIEN MOORE III, University of New Hampshire SUZANNE OPARIL, University of Alabama, Birmingham JOSEPH F. VEVERKA, Cornell University WARREN M. WASHINGTON, National Center for Atmospheric Research A. THOMAS YOUNG, Lockheed Martin Corporation (retired) Staff JOSEPH K. ALEXANDER, Study Director CLAUDETTE K. BAYLOR-FLEMING, Administrative Assistant CATHERINE A. GRUBER, Assistant Editor

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop SPACE STUDIES BOARD LENNARD A. FISK, University of Michigan, Chair A. THOMAS YOUNG, Lockheed Martin Corporation (retired), Vice Chair SPIRO K. ANTIOCHOS, Naval Research Laboratory DANIEL N. BAKER, University of Colorado STEVEN J. BATTEL, Battel Engineering CHARLES L. BENNETT, Johns Hopkins University JUDITH A. CURRY, Georgia Institute of Technology JACK D. FARMER, Arizona State University JACK D. FELLOWS, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research JACQUELINE N. HEWITT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology TAMARA E. JERNIGAN, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory KLAUS KEIL, University of Hawaii BERRIEN MOORE III, University of New Hampshire KENNETH H. NEALSON, University of Southern California NORMAN P. NEUREITER, American Association for the Advancement of Science SUZANNE OPARIL, University of Alabama JAMES PAWELCZYK, Pennsylvania State University RONALD PROBSTEIN, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (emeritus) HARVEY D. TANANBAUM, Harvard-Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory RICHARD H. TRULY, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (retired) JOSEPH F. VEVERKA, Cornell University WARREN M. WASHINGTON, National Center for Atmospheric Research GARY P. ZANK, University of California at Riverside MARCIA S. SMITH, Director

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop Preface National Research Council (NRC) decadal science strategy surveys provide decade-long retrospective and forward-looking assessments of the status of and outlook for a research field, and they provide broadly based recommendations for explicit scientific and programmatic priorities for future investments in the field. While these surveys have been widely successful, implementation problems have been encountered as the relevant government agencies and the scientific community try to follow the advice contained in them. These problems, which have been due to a combination of fiscal, technical, programmatic, and policy factors, suggest that the approach to future decadal surveys needs to be carefully examined and possibly modified or improved. Consequently, the Space Studies Board concluded that it would be timely and important to bring members of the research community and representatives of relevant government offices together to discuss the use of NRC decadal surveys for developing and implementing scientific priorities, to review and discuss lessons learned from the most recent surveys, and to identify approaches that could enhance the realism, utility, and endurance of future surveys. A public workshop was conducted on November 14-16, 2006, at the National Academies’ Beckman Center in Irvine, California, to address these issues. A workshop planning committee, whose members were drawn from the membership of the Space Studies Board, developed an agenda for the workshop and selected and invited workshop participants. The workshop featured presentations, panel discussions, and general discussions on the use of NRC decadal surveys for developing and implementing scientific priorities in astronomy and astrophysics, planetary science, solar and space physics, and Earth science. The workshop

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop agenda is presented in Appendix A, and short biographies of the approximately 60 participants from academia, industry, government, and the NRC are presented in Appendix B. This workshop report, prepared by the workshop rapporteur, Jack D. Fellows, with the assistance of NRC staff member Joseph Alexander, is intended to be a summary of what occurred at the workshop. The Space Studies Board intends for the report to stimulate discussion about future decadal surveys all across the scientific community, the relevant federal agencies, and Congress and to be useful to the NRC as the next rounds of decadal surveys are planned and organized.

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop Acknowledgment of Reviewers This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report: Steven Battel, Battel Engineering, Wesley Huntress, Carnegie Institute of Washington, Joseph Taylor, Princeton University, and Megan Urry, Yale University. Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the statements presented in the report nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by William W. Hoover, independent consultant (U.S. Air Force, retired). Appointed by the National Research Council, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authors and the institution.

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop This page intentionally left blank.

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop Contents     SUMMARY   1 1   INTRODUCTION   6 2   REVIEW OF RECENT DECADAL SURVEYS   9      Views of Past Committee Chairs,   9      Views from the Federal Agencies,   16      Views from Congress,   18      Recurring Themes,   19 3   ASSESSING COST AND TECHNOLOGY READINESS   21      Panel Member Presentations and Discussion,   22      Recurring Themes,   29 4   LESSONS LEARNED AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NEXT DECADAL SURVEYS   31      Sustaining the Overall Value of Surveys,   31      Survey Design, Structure, and Timing,   33      Priorities, Queuing, Balance, and Portfolio Mix,   34      Resilience, Execution, Technology Readiness, and Risk,   36      Cost Estimates,   38      Interagency Collaboration,   39      International Collaboration,   39

OCR for page R1
Decadal Science Strategy Surveys: Report of a Workshop                APPENDIXES          A  Workshop Agenda   43      B  Participant Biographies   48      C  Excerpts from Presentation by Jon Morse, Office of Science and Technology Policy   62