References

Alexander, C.H. (1993). A continuous measurement alternative for the U.S. census. Report CM-10, October 28. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

______ (1997). Impact of multiyear averaging of data from the American Community Survey. Pp. 644-649 in Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, ASA Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

______ (1998, August). Recent developments in the American Community Survey. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Dallas. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

______ (2001). Still rolling: Leslie Kish’s “rolling samples” and the American Community Survey. In Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 2001—Achieving data quality in a statistical agency: A methodological perspective. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

Anderson, M.J. (2000). Encyclopedia of the U.S. census. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Asiala, M.E. (2004). Specifications for selecting the ACS 2005 main HU sample (ACS-S-40). Draft memorandum to L. McGinn from R. Singh. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

______ (2005). American Community Survey research report: Differential sub-sampling in the computer assisted personal interview sample selection in areas of low cooperation rates. Memorandum to R. Singh from D. Hubble. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

______ (2007, February 21). ACS weighting and estimation research. PowerPoint presentation. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

Bell, W.R. (2006). Using statistical models to combine CPS and ACS income and poverty estimates with other data (administrative records). Draft paper, May 8. Prepared for the Workshop Exploring Possible Development of One Set of Integrated Income and Poverty Estimates, May 30-31. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 261
Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges References Alexander, C.H. (1993). A continuous measurement alternative for the U.S. census. Report CM-10, October 28. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. ______ (1997). Impact of multiyear averaging of data from the American Community Survey. Pp. 644-649 in Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, ASA Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. ______ (1998, August). Recent developments in the American Community Survey. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Dallas. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. ______ (2001). Still rolling: Leslie Kish’s “rolling samples” and the American Community Survey. In Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 2001—Achieving data quality in a statistical agency: A methodological perspective. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Anderson, M.J. (2000). Encyclopedia of the U.S. census. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Asiala, M.E. (2004). Specifications for selecting the ACS 2005 main HU sample (ACS-S-40). Draft memorandum to L. McGinn from R. Singh. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. ______ (2005). American Community Survey research report: Differential sub-sampling in the computer assisted personal interview sample selection in areas of low cooperation rates. Memorandum to R. Singh from D. Hubble. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. ______ (2007, February 21). ACS weighting and estimation research. PowerPoint presentation. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Bell, W.R. (2006). Using statistical models to combine CPS and ACS income and poverty estimates with other data (administrative records). Draft paper, May 8. Prepared for the Workshop Exploring Possible Development of One Set of Integrated Income and Poverty Estimates, May 30-31. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

OCR for page 261
Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges Biemer, P.P., and Lyberg, L.E. (2003). Introduction to survey quality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Blumerman, L.M., and Simon, C.R. (2006). Subnational population estimates for the 1990s: An evaluation. Draft paper. Population Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Bureau of Labor Statistics and U.S. Census Bureau (2002, March). Current Population Survey design and methodology. Technical Paper 63RV. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Department of Commerce. Available: http://www.bls.census.gov/cps/tp/tp63.htm. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (1996, April). Implications of continuous measurement for the uses of census data in transportation planning. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation. Chakrabarty, R., assisted by G. Torres (1996). The American Housing Survey—A quality profile. Current Housing Reports, H121/95-1. Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and U.S. Census Bureau. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Chand, N., and Alexander, C.H. (1997). Small area estimation with administrative records and continuous measurement. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Anaheim, CA. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Citro, C.F. (2000a). Federal agency uses of census data. Pp. 216-217 in M.J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. census. Washington, DC: CQ Press. ______ (2000b). Long form. Pp. 272-277 in M.J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census. Washington, DC: CQ Press. ______ (2000c). Sampling for content. Pp. 323-325 in M.J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. census. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Coder, J. (1991). Exploring nonsampling errors in the wage and salary income data from the March Current Population Survey. Paper prepared for the Allied Social Sciences Association/Society of Government Economists meeting, Washington, DC. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. ______ (1992). Using administrative record information to evaluate the quality of the income data collected in the Survey of Income and Program Participation. In Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 92—Design and analysis of longitudinal surveys. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Dean, J., and Peterson, A. (2005). Updating the Master Address File: Analysis of adding addresses via the Community Address Updating System. In Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, ASA Section on Government Statistics. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. de Leeuw, E.D. (2005). To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21(2), 233-255. Desplanques, G. (2003). The new census. Paris, France: National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies. Devine, J.E., and Coleman, C.D. (2003). People might move but housing units don’t: An evaluation of the state and county housing unit estimates. Population Division Working Paper Series No. 71. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Energy Information Administration (1996). Residential energy consumption survey quality profile. Prepared by T.B. Jabine. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. Fay, R.E. (2005). Model-assisted estimation for the American Community Survey. Pp. 3016-3023 in Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, ASA Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

OCR for page 261
Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges ______ (2006). Using administrative records with model-assisted estimation for the American Community Survey. In Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Groves, R., Fowler, F., Couper, M., Lepkowski, J., Singer, E., and Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Hansen, M.H., and Hurwitz, W.N. (1946). The problem of nonresponse in sample surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 41, 517-529. Hefter, S.P. (2005a, June 16). Specifications for selecting the main and supplemental housing unit address samples for the American Community Survey. 2006 American Community Survey Sampling Memorandum Series #ACS06-S-3, draft memorandum to L. McGinn from R.P. Singh. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. ______ (2005b, May 19). Specifications for selecting the American Community Survey group quarters sample. 2006 American Community Survey Sampling Memorandum Series #ACS06-S-6, draft memorandum to L. McGinn from R.P. Singh. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Horvitz, D.G. (1986, May 1). Statement to the Subcommittee on Census and Population, Committee on Post Office and Civil Service, U.S. House of Representatives. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. Huang, E.T., and Bell, W.R. (2005). An empirical study on using ACS supplementary survey data in SAIPE state poverty models. Working paper. Statistical Research Division, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Israel, S. (2006). Disability in the San Francisco Bay area: Comparing data between Census 2000 and the American Community Survey 2000-2004. Working paper. Planning Section, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, CA. Kalton, G., Levine, D.B., Waksberg, J., and Helmick, J. (1998, June 29). The American Community Survey—The quality of rural data: Report of a conference. Rockville, MD: Westat. Kalton, G., Winglee, M., Krawchuk, S., and Levine, D. (2000). Quality profile for SASS rounds 1-3: 1098-1005: Aspects of the quality of data in the Schools and Staffing Surveys (SASS). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Kish, L. (1992). Weighting for unequal Pi. Journal of Official Statistics, 8, 183-200. Kish, L., and Hess, I. (1959). A “replacement” procedure for reducing the bias of nonresponse. The American Statistician, 49, 520-538. Maples, J.J. (2004, August). Investigating the use of IRS tax data in the SAIPE school district poverty estimates. Presentation to the Joint Statistical Meetings. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Martin, E., and Gerber, E. (2003, August 5). Methodological influences on comparability of race measurements: several cautionary examples. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, San Francisco. U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. National Research Council (1995). Modernizing the U.S. census. Panel on Census Requirements in the Year 2000 and Beyond, B. Edmonston and C. Schultze, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. ______ (2000a). Small-area estimates of school-age children in poverty—Evaluation of current methodology. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, C.F. Citro and G. Kalton, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

OCR for page 261
Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges ______ (2000b). Small-area income and poverty estimates—Priorities for 2000 and beyond. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, C.F. Citro and G. Kalton, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. ______ (2001). The 2000 census: Interim assessment. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, C.F. Citro, D.L. Cork, and J.L. Norwood, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. ______ (2003a). Statistical issues in allocating funds by formula. Panel on Formula Allocations, T.A. Louis, T.B. Jabine, and M.A. Gerstein, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ______ (2003b). Survey automation: Report and workshop proceedings. Oversight Committee for the Workshop on Survey Automation, M.L. Cohen, D.L. Cork, R. Groves, and W. Kalsbeek, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ______ (2004a). Reengineering the 2010 census: Risks and challenges. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, D.L. Cork, M.L. Cohen, and B.F. King, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ______ (2004b). The 2000 census: Counting under adversity. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, C.F. Citro, D.L. Cork, and J.L. Norwood, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ______ (2005). Expanding access to research data: Reconciling risks and opportunities. Panel on Access to Research Data, Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ______ (2006). Once, only once, and in the right place: Residence rules in the decennial census. Panel on Residence Rules in the Decennial Census, D.L. Cork and P.R. Voss, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Nelson, C. (2006, May 30). What do we know about differences between CPS and ACS income and poverty estimates? Paper prepared for the Workshop Exploring Possible Development of One Set of Integrated Income and Poverty Estimates. U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Office for National Statistics (2003). Alternatives to a census: Rolling census. Census Strategic Development Review Information Paper. London, England: Office for National Statistics. ORC Macro (2002, September). The American Community Survey: Challenges and opportunities for HUD. Paper prepared under contract for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC. Palumbo, T. (2005, May 11). Toward improving the quality of labor force data from the American Community Survey. PowerPoint presentation. U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Posey, K.G., and Welniak, E. (1998, March). Income in the ACS: Comparisons to the 1990 census. Prepared for the American Community Survey (ACS) symposium held at the Bureau of the Census, Suitland, Maryland. Last revised: June 17, 1999. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Reese, A.J. (2007, February 21). A comparison of housing unit estimates to the American Community Survey Master Address File. PowerPoint presentation. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

OCR for page 261
Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges Resnick, D., and Obenski, S. (2006). Methods and file acquisitions supporting the expanded use of administrative records. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Seattle. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. Ruggles, S. (2000). IPUMS (Integrated Public Use Microdata Series). Pp. 264-267 in M.J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. census. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Schneider, P. (2004). Content and data quality in census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 12 (revised, January 22). U.S. Census Bureau. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Starsinic, M. (2005). American Community Survey: Improving reliability for small area estimates. Pp. 3592-3599 in Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, ASA Section on Survey Research Methods. (CD-ROM). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Stern, S., and Brault, M. (2005, January 28). Disability data from the American Community Survey: A brief examination of the effects of a question redesign in 2003. Working paper. Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Taeuber, C.M. (2006). American Community Survey data for community planning. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: Trafford Publishing. Turek, J., Denmead, G., and James, B. (2005). Poverty estimates in the ACS and other income surveys: What is the impact of methodology? Working paper. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Census Bureau (1998). Survey of income and program participation quality profile 1998, 3rd edition. Prepared by Westat, G. Kalton, project director. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Available: http://www.bls.census.gov/sipp/workpaper/230/pdf. ______ (2001, July). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs—Implementing the American Community Survey, Report 1: Demonstrating operational feasibility. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. ______ (2002a). 2002 census of governments, government organization. Vol. 1, no. 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. ______ (2002b, May). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs—Implementing the American Community Survey, Report 2: Demonstrating survey quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. ______ (2003, December). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs—Implementing the American Community Survey, Report 3: Testing the use of voluntary methods. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. ______ (2004a, May). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs—Implementing the American Community Survey, Report 4: Comparing general demographic and housing characteristics with census 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. ______ (2004b, May). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs—Implementing the American Community Survey, Report 5: Comparing economic characteristics with census 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. ______ (2004c, June). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs—Implementing the American Community Survey, Report 7: Comparing quality measures: Comparing the American Community Survey’s three-year averages and census 2000’s long form sample estimates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. ______ (2004d, June). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs—Implementing the American Community Survey, Report 8: Comparison of the ACS 3-year average and the census 2000 sample for a sample of counties and tracts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

OCR for page 261
Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges ______ (2004e, June). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs—Implementing the American Community Survey, Report 9: Comparing social characteristics with census 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. ______ (2004f, July). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs—Implementing the American Community Survey, Report 10: Comparing selected physical and financial housing characteristics with census 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. ______ (2005, December). Census 2000, public use microdata sample (PUMS), United States, technical documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. ______ (2006, May). Design and methodology—American Community Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Available: http://www.census.gov/acs/www. U.S. General Accounting Office (1998, March). 2000 census: Preparations for dress rehearsal leave many unanswered questions. GAO/GGD-98-74. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. General Services Administration (2006). Catalog of domestic federal assistance. Washington, DC. Available: http://www.gas.gov/cfda. U.S. Government Accountability Office (2004, October). American Community Survey—Key unresolved issues. GAO-05-82. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Zaslavsky, A.M., and Schirm, A.L. (2002). Interactions between survey estimates and federal funding formulas. Journal of Official Statistics, 18(3), 371-391. Zayatz, L.V. (2005, December 13). ACS base tables on workplace and means of transportation review. Memorandum for L. McGinn. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.