The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges
Biemer, P.P., and Lyberg, L.E. (2003). Introduction to survey quality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Blumerman, L.M., and Simon, C.R. (2006). Subnational population estimates for the 1990s:An evaluation. Draft paper. Population Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
Bureau of Labor Statistics and U.S. Census Bureau (2002, March). Current Population Surveydesign and methodology. Technical Paper 63RV. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Department of Commerce. Available: http://www.bls.census.gov/cps/tp/tp63.htm.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (1996, April). Implications of continuous measurement forthe uses of census data in transportation planning. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
Chakrabarty, R., assisted by G. Torres (1996). The American Housing Survey—A qualityprofile. Current Housing Reports, H121/95-1. Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and U.S. Census Bureau. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
Chand, N., and Alexander, C.H. (1997). Small area estimation with administrative recordsand continuous measurement. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Anaheim, CA. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
Citro, C.F. (2000a). Federal agency uses of census data. Pp. 216-217 in M.J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. census. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
______ (2000b). Long form. Pp. 272-277 in M.J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S.Census. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
______ (2000c). Sampling for content. Pp. 323-325 in M.J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia ofthe U.S. census. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Coder, J. (1991). Exploring nonsampling errors in the wage and salary income data from theMarch Current Population Survey. Paper prepared for the Allied Social Sciences Association/Society of Government Economists meeting, Washington, DC. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
______ (1992). Using administrative record information to evaluate the quality of the income data collected in the Survey of Income and Program Participation. In Proceedings ofStatistics Canada Symposium 92—Design and analysis of longitudinal surveys. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Dean, J., and Peterson, A. (2005). Updating the Master Address File: Analysis of adding addresses via the Community Address Updating System. In Proceedings of the JointStatistical Meetings, ASA Section on Government Statistics. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
de Leeuw, E.D. (2005). To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal ofOfficial Statistics, 21(2), 233-255.
Desplanques, G. (2003). The new census. Paris, France: National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies.
Devine, J.E., and Coleman, C.D. (2003). People might move but housing units don’t: An evaluation of the state and county housing unit estimates. Population Division Working Paper Series No. 71. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Energy Information Administration (1996). Residential energy consumption survey qualityprofile. Prepared by T.B. Jabine. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
Fay, R.E. (2005). Model-assisted estimation for the American Community Survey. Pp. 3016-3023 in Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, ASA Section on Survey ResearchMethods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.