The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
India's Changing Innovation System: Achievements, Challenges, and Opportunities for Cooperation: Report of a Symposium
Athreye, Suma S. 2000. “Technology Policy and Innovation: The Role of Competition Between Firms.” In Pedro Conceicao, Syed Shariq, and Manuel Heitor, eds. Science, Technology, andInnovation Policy: Opportunities and Challenges for the Knowledge Economy. Westport, CT and London, UK: Quorum Books.
Audretsch, David B. 2006. The Entrepreneurial Society, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Audretsch, David B., Heike Grimm, and Charles W. Wessner. 2005. Local Heroes in the Global Village: Globalization and the New Entrepreneurship Policies. New York: Springer.
Audretsch, David B., ed. 1998. Industrial Policy and Competitive Advantage, Volumes 1 and 2. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Audretsch, D. B., B. Bozeman, K. L. Combs, M. P. Feldman, A. N. Link, D. S. Siegel, P. Stephan, G. Tassey, and C. Wessner. 2002. “The Economics of Science and Technology.” Journal ofTechnology Transfer 27:155–203.
Baddeley, Michelle, Kirsty McNay, and Robert Cassen. 2006. “Divergence in India: Income Differentials at the State Level, 1970–97.” Journal of Development Studies 42(6):1000–1022.
Baldwin, John Russel, and Peter Hanel. 2003. Innovation and Knowledge Creation in an OpenEconomy: Canadian Industry and International Implications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Balzat, Markus, and Andreas Pyka. 2006. “Mapping National Innovation Systems in the OECD Area.” International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 2(1–2):158–176.
Bartzokas, Anthony, and Morris Teubal. 2002. “The Political Economy of Innovation Policy Implementation in Developing Countries.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11(4–5).
Bhidé, Amar. 2006. “Venturesome Consumption, Innovation and Globalization.” Paper presented at the Centre on Capitalism & Society and CESifo Venice Summer Institute 2006, “Perspectives on the Performance of the Continent’s Economies,” Venice International University. San Servolo, Italy, July 21–22.
Biegelbauer, Peter S., and Susana Borras, eds. 2003. Innovation Policies in Europe and the U.S.: TheNew Agenda. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Blomström, Magnus, Ari Kokko, and Fredrik Sjöholm. 2002. “Growth & Innovation Policies for a Knowledge Economy: Experiences from Finland, Sweden, & Singapore.” EIJS Working Paper, Series No. 156.
Bloomberg News. 2006. “The Next Green Revolution.” August 21.
Borras, Susana. 2003. The Innovation Policy of the European Union: From Government to Governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Borrus, Michael, and Jay Stowsky. 2000. “Technology Policy and Economic Growth.” In Charles Edquist and Maureen McKelvey, eds. Systems of Innovation: Growth, Competitiveness andEmployment, Vol. 2. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Branscomb, Lewis M., and Philip E. Auerswald. 2002. Between Invention and Innovation: An Analysis of Funding for Early-Stage Technology Development. NIST GCR 02–841. Gathersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. November.
Buchanan, James M. 1987. “An Economic Theory of Clubs.” In Economics: Between a PredictiveScience and Moral Philosophy. College Station, TX: Texan A&M University Press, 1987.
Caracostas, Paraskevas, and Ugur Muldur. 2001. “The Emergence of the New European Union Research and Innovation Policy.” In P. Laredo and P. Mustar, eds. Research and InnovationPolicies in the New Global Economy: An International Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Chand, Satish, and Kunal Sen. 2002. “Trade Liberalization and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing.” Review of Development Economics 6, February.
Chesbrough, Henry. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting fromTechnology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Cimoli, Mario, and Marina della Giusta. 2000. “The Nature of Technological Change and Its Main Implications on National and Local Systems of Innovation.” IIASA Interim Report IR-98-029.