References

Adams, T., and X. Liu (2001). Evaluation of Lack of Balance and Geographic Errors Affecting Person Estimates. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 2, Oct.11, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

Alho, J.M. (1990). Logistic regression in capture-recapture models. Biometrics 46:623-635.

Alho, J.M. (1994). Analysis of sample based capture-recapture experiments. Journal of Official Statistics 10(3):245-256.

Alho, J.M., M.H. Mulry, K. Wurdeman, and J. Kim (1993). Estimating heterogeneity in the probabilities of enumeration for dual-systems estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88(423):1130-1136.

Alho, J.M., and B.D. Spencer (2005). Statistical Demography and Forecasting, New York: Springer.

Auer, P.L. (2004). Study for Cases with Insufficient Information for Matching and Follow-up. Unpublished paper, Dec. 15, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

Bates, N.A., and E. Gerber (1998). Temporary mobility and reporting of usual residence. Survey Methodology 24(1):89-98.

Bell, W.R. (1993). Using information from demographic analysis in post-enumeration survey estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88(423):1106-1118.

Bell, W.R. (2001). Report 10: Estimation of Correlation Bias in 2000 A.C.E. Using Revised Demographic Analysis Results. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Oct. 16, Methodology and Standards Directorate, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

Bell, W.R. (2005). Contamination Between Census Coverage Follow-Up and Coverage Measurement—Considerations for Implementing Dual-Systems Estimation. Unpublished draft, July 14, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

Bench, K. (2002). A Contamination of Census 2000 Data Collected in Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Block Clusters. Census 2000 Evaluation N.1, Aug. 22. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Brownrigg, L.A. and M. de la Puenta (1993). Alternative Enumeration Methods and Results: Resolution and Resolved Population by Site. 1990 Decennial Census Preliminary Research and Evaluation Memorandum No. 219, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 77
Research and Plans for Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Census: Interim Assessment: Panel on Coverage Evaluation and Correlation Bias in the 2010 Census References Adams, T., and X. Liu (2001). Evaluation of Lack of Balance and Geographic Errors Affecting Person Estimates. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 2, Oct.11, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Alho, J.M. (1990). Logistic regression in capture-recapture models. Biometrics 46:623-635. Alho, J.M. (1994). Analysis of sample based capture-recapture experiments. Journal of Official Statistics 10(3):245-256. Alho, J.M., M.H. Mulry, K. Wurdeman, and J. Kim (1993). Estimating heterogeneity in the probabilities of enumeration for dual-systems estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88(423):1130-1136. Alho, J.M., and B.D. Spencer (2005). Statistical Demography and Forecasting, New York: Springer. Auer, P.L. (2004). Study for Cases with Insufficient Information for Matching and Follow-up. Unpublished paper, Dec. 15, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Bates, N.A., and E. Gerber (1998). Temporary mobility and reporting of usual residence. Survey Methodology 24(1):89-98. Bell, W.R. (1993). Using information from demographic analysis in post-enumeration survey estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88(423):1106-1118. Bell, W.R. (2001). Report 10: Estimation of Correlation Bias in 2000 A.C.E. Using Revised Demographic Analysis Results. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Oct. 16, Methodology and Standards Directorate, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Bell, W.R. (2005). Contamination Between Census Coverage Follow-Up and Coverage Measurement—Considerations for Implementing Dual-Systems Estimation. Unpublished draft, July 14, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Bench, K. (2002). A Contamination of Census 2000 Data Collected in Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Block Clusters. Census 2000 Evaluation N.1, Aug. 22. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Brownrigg, L.A. and M. de la Puenta (1993). Alternative Enumeration Methods and Results: Resolution and Resolved Population by Site. 1990 Decennial Census Preliminary Research and Evaluation Memorandum No. 219, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

OCR for page 77
Research and Plans for Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Census: Interim Assessment: Panel on Coverage Evaluation and Correlation Bias in the 2010 Census Childers, D.R. (1992). The 1990 Housing Unit Coverage Study. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methodology. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Coale, A.J. (1955). The population of the United States in 1950 classified by age, sex and color—A revision of census figures. Journal of the American Statistical Association 50(269):16-54. Coale, A.J., and W. Norfleet Rives, Jr. (1972). A Statistical Reconstruction of the Black Population of the United States, 1880-1970: Estimates of True Numbers by Age and Sex, Birth Rates, and Total Fertility. Unpublished document prepared under a project agreement with the U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Coale, A.J., and M. Zelnik (1963). New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Cohen, M.L. (2000). Coverage evaluation. Pp. 95-101 in M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census. Washington, DC: CQ Press. M. de la Puenta (2004). Census 2000 Ethnographic Studies. Census 2000 Topic Report No. 15, Census Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, March, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Dillman, D.A., J.B. Treat, and J.R. Clark (1994). Influence of 13 design factors on completion rates to decennial census questionnaires. Annual Research Conference and CASIC Technologies Interchange Proceedings, March, Rosslyn, VA. DuMouchel, W.H., and G.J. Duncan (1983). Using sample survey weights in multiple regression analyses of stratified samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association 78(383):535-543. Ellis, Y. (1995). Examination of census omission and erroneous enumeration based on 1990 ethnographic studies of census coverage. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Ericksen, E., F. Leobardo Estrada, J.W. Tukey, and K.M. Wolter (1991). Report on the 1990 Decennial Census and the Post-Enumeration Survey. Manuscript prepared for the secretary of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Fay, R.E. (2002). Probabilistic models for detecting census person duplication. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Fay, R.E. (2003). Probabilistic models for detecting census duplication at the person and household levels. In Proceedings of the Section on Government Statistics. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Fay, R.E. (2004). An analysis of person duplication in census 2000. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Fein, D.J. (1990). Racial and ethnic differences in U.S. census omission rates. Demography 27(2):285-302. Feldpausch, R. (2001). Census Person Duplication and the Corresponding A.C.E. Enumeration Status. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II (Report 6), Oct. 31, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

OCR for page 77
Research and Plans for Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Census: Interim Assessment: Panel on Coverage Evaluation and Correlation Bias in the 2010 Census Fenstermaker, D.A. (2002). A.C.E. Revision II Results: Further Study of Person Duplication. A.C.E. Revision II Memorandum Series #PP-51. (Prepared by Thomas Mule.) Dec. 31, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Fenstermaker, D.A. (2005). 2010 Census Coverage Measurement: Provisional Sample Allocation. 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Memorandum Series #2010-C-01. (Signed by Peter P. Davis.) Oct. 26, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Fowlkes, E.B. (1987). Some diagnostics for binary logistic regression via smoothing. Biometrika 74(3):503-515. Garcia-Parra, C. (1987). Causes for Undercoverage in East Los Angeles from an Anthropological Perspective. Report prepared under contract, April, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Griffin, R.A. (2000). Post-stratification classification affected by household coverage. In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Griffin, R.A. (2005a). Initial Results of Preliminary Net Error Empirical Research Using Logistic Regression. 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Memorandum Series # 2010-E03. (Prepared by Thomas Mule and Douglas Olson.) April 18, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Griffin, R.A. (2005b). Preliminary Research on Separate Estimation of the Population in Enumerated and Non-Enumerated Housing Units. DSSD 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Memorandum Series # 2010-E06. (Prepared by Thomas Mule.) Nov. 29, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Habermann, S.J., W. Jiang, and B.D. Spencer (1998). Activity 7: Develop Methodology for Evaluating Model-Based Estimates of the Population Size for States. Paper prepared for the U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Haines, D. (2002). A.C.E. Revision II Adjustment for Correlation Bias. DSSD A.C.E. Revision II Memorandum Series PP-53. (Prepared by Roger Shores.) Dec. 31, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Hawley, W. (2004). MAF/TIGER Accuracy Improvement Project—An Update. Presentation to WaTrans Partner’s Meeting, March 2, Washington, DC Hill, J.M., and J.D. Machowski (2003). Census 2000 Evaluation B.6., Master Trace Sample. Sept. 29, Planning, Research, and Evaluation Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Huggins, R.M. (1989). On the statistical analysis of capture-recapture experiments. Biometrika 76:133-140. Kostanich, D., and D. Whitford (2005). Discussion of the Proposal to Reduce Respondent Burden for Households in Both Census Coverage Followup and Census Coverage Measurement. 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Memorandum Series # A-07. Nov. 29, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Little, R. (2003). To Model or Not to Model? Competing Modes of Inference for Finite Population Sampling. University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series, Working Paper #4.

OCR for page 77
Research and Plans for Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Census: Interim Assessment: Panel on Coverage Evaluation and Correlation Bias in the 2010 Census Malec, D., and J. Maples (2005). An evaluation of synthetic, small-area census coverage error using a random effects model. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Marks, E.S., W. Seltzer, and K.J. Krotki (1974). Population Growth Estimation. New York: The Population Council. Martin, E.A. (1999). Who knows who lives here? Within-household disagreements as a source of survey coverage error. Public Opinion Quarterly 63(2):220-237. Martin, E.A., L.A. Brownrigg, and R.E. Fay (1990). Results of the 1988 ethnographic studies of census coverage and plans for 1990. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Moriarity, C., and D. Childers (1993). Analysis of census omissions: Preliminary results. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Mule, T. (2001). ESCAP II Person Duplication in Census 2000. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 20, Oct. 11, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Mule, T. (2003). A.C.E. Revision II Results: Change in Estimated Net Undercount. Decennial Statistical Studies Division, A.C.E. Revision II Memorandum Series PP-58. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Mulry, M.H. (2002). A.C.E. Revision II Missing Data Evaluation Final Report (through David L. Hubble, prepared by Anne T. Kearney). DSSD A.C.E. Revision II Memorandum Series #PP-48. Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Mulry, M.H., E. Schindler, T. Mule, N. Nguyen, and B.D. Spencer (2005). Investigation of extreme estimates of census coverage error for small areas. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. National Research Council. (1985). The Bicentennial Census: New Directions for Methodology in 1990. Panel on Decennial Census Methodology. C.F. Citro and M. L. Cohen, eds. Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2004a). Reengineering the 2010 Census: Risks and Challenges. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods. D.L. Cork, M.L. Cohen, and B.F. King, eds. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2004b). The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Panel to Review the 2000 Census. C.F. Citro, D.L. Cork, and J.L. Norwood, eds. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2006). Once, Only Once, and in the Right Place: Residence Rules in the Decennial Census. Panel on Residence Rules in the Decennial Census. D.L. Cork and P.R. Voss, eds. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

OCR for page 77
Research and Plans for Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Census: Interim Assessment: Panel on Coverage Evaluation and Correlation Bias in the 2010 Census Price, D.O. (1947). A check on underenumeration in the 1940 census. American Sociological Review 12(1):44-49. Resnick, D., S. Love, C. Taeuber, and J.M.Staveley (2004). Analysis of ACS food stamp program participation underestimate. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Government Statistics Section. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Robinson, J.G. (2001). Demographic Analysis Results. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report No. 1, Oct.13, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Robinson, J.G., B. Ahmed, P. Das Gupta, and K.A. Woodrow (1993). Estimation of population coverage in the 1990 United States census based on demographic analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(423):1061-1071. Ruhnke, M.C. (2003). An Assessment of Addresses on the Master Address File “Missing” in the Census or Geocoded to the Wrong Collection Block. Census 2000 Evaluation F.15. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Schindler, E. (2006). 2010 Census coverage measurement: The Hunt for the magic variables. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Sekar, C.C., and W.E. Deming (1949). On a method of estimating birth and death rates and the extent of registration. Journal of the American Statistical Association 44:101-115. Siegel, J.S., and Zelnik, M. (1966). An evaluation of coverage in the 1960 census of population by techniques of demographic analysis and by composite methods. Pp. 71-85 in Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Shoemaker, H.H. (2005). Results of a Feasibility Study to Match Census Enumerations Coded in A.C.E. as Insufficient for Matching and Follow-up. 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Memorandum Series #2010-B01, April 18, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Spencer, B.D. (2005). Statistical Analysis Research on Small Area Estimation of Census Coverage. Prepared by Abt Associates Inc. and Spencer Statistics, Inc. for the Bureau of the Census, Activity 1—Deliverable 6, March 22. Stuart, E.A., and A.M. Zaslavsky (2002). Using administrative records to predict census day residency. Pp. 335-349 in Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics, Vol. VI, edited by C. Gatsonis, R.E. Kass, A Carriquiry, A. Gelman, D. Higdon, D.K Pauler, and I. Verdinelli. New York: Springer. Trussell, J. (1981). Should state and local area census counts be adjusted? Population Index 47(1):4-12. U.S. Census Bureau (2003). Technical Assessment of A.C.E. Revision II. Washington, DC. U.S. Census Bureau. (2004). The 2006 Census Coverage Measurement Test. Unpublished draft, April 7. U.S. Census Bureau (2005), Framework for Coverage Error Components. Unpublished draft, May 26.

OCR for page 77
Research and Plans for Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Census: Interim Assessment: Panel on Coverage Evaluation and Correlation Bias in the 2010 Census Valentine, C.B., and B.L. Valentine (1971). Missing Men: A Comparative Methodological Study of Underenumeration and Related Problems. Report prepared under Joint Statistical Agreement with the Brookdale Hospital Center, Washington, DC, and the U.S. Census Bureau.