National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$90.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program at the Department of Defense (2009)

Citation Manager

. "6 Program Management." An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program at the Department of Defense. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
188
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Defense
FIGURE 6-1 SBIR timeline at DoD.

FIGURE 6-1 SBIR timeline at DoD.

SOURCE: Michael Caccuitto, DoD SBIR/STTR Program Administrator and Carol Van Wyk, DoD CPP Coordinator. Presentation to SBTC SBIR in Rapid Transition Conference, Washington, DC, September 27, 2006.

The latter must therefore be assessed primarily through interviews, focused on current practice, with awardees, agency staff, and other stakeholders.2

Finally, it is worth noting that DoD processes are quite complex—unsurprising, given the high volume of proposals and awards, and the wide variety of Service and Agency objectives. However, it is possible to provide an overview of core activities, as seen in Figure 6-1. Each phase of the SBIR program will be reviewed in turn. Figure 6-1 shows the significant pre-solicitation activities focused around topic development, some of the funding initiatives in place (Fast Track and Phase II Enhancements), and the potential role of Phase III which, as we shall see, should be part of very early activities within the SBIR framework.

2

The continuing, at times incremental nature of these changes set against the longer term, often circuitous processes of firm growth and commercialization of SBIR awards complicates efforts to relate program management techniques to performance outcomes. Thus, results measured for awards that occurred ten years ago may not adequately describe how well a service or agency is managing in its SBIR program today.

Page
188