National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 Spread and Implementation of Research Findings
Suggested Citation:"6 Breakout Groups." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×

6
Breakout Groups

Workshop attendees were asked to split into two breakout groups: (1) research and (2) spread and implementation of research findings. The groups met for an hour before reconvening. Each group had a leader in charge of reporting the content of their discussions to the entire workshop. This chapter summarizes these reports.

SPREAD AND IMPLEMENTATION OF RESEARCH FINDINGS

Andrea Kabcenell of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement served as leader and reporter for the spread and implementation group, which discussed the following question: What do we need to know about strategies for change to foster spread and implementation? The group developed a three-part model, recognizing that information was needed in three general areas to foster spread of good ideas: the why (will), the what (ideas), and the how (execution).

A number of themes were addressed in discussing the will and motivation for spread. The discussion included leadership, which built off of the earlier notion of “What tribe are you in?” to figure out how to leverage people’s affiliations to motivate change. In discussing the ideas for spread, the conclusion was that the information gleaned from typical research studies was necessary but not sufficient. The common frustration was that current research

Suggested Citation:"6 Breakout Groups." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×

is not as in depth as needed, Kabcenell said. Gaps in knowledge included how to get changes right and how to engage physicians. Making relevant knowledge accessible was identified as a systemic issue. In discussing the information marketplace, the group identified a number of ways to collect information, including the Internet, improvement networks, and social networks.

Execution of spread covered a range of issues, from high-level policy issues to front-line practitioners, with an emphasis on the need to capitalize on opportunities for collaboration. Environments can foster teamwork and tools such as technology, and transparency can enhance data sharing. The group also explored the idea of a renewable organization for improvement, where the expertise and power built for one project could become the basis for future projects. One particular call was to disseminate the knowledge that is already known. Much of what is known already is not widely known or readily available to a broad audience. Competition was also identified as a barrier to collaboration.

The importance of having linkages between the research and implementation communities was highlighted. Implementers could offer researchers the ability to test theories and ideas in real labs, while also providing expertise from an operational perspective. The need for research to have a user-oriented approach was also discussed. Additionally, allowing implementers to provide more input could be beneficial in research design and execution of change. Implementers could also be used a resource for funding.

The group discussed what information implementers wanted from researchers. In particular, core elements or essential ingredients for implementing change were desired, ranging from measures of organizational readiness to context, from the tools available for change to who needs to participate. It was noted that a standard way of communicating across organizations is imperative. Another type of information centered on troubleshooting to help determine why a tool or mechanism did not achieve its desired effects. Although cost data and strength of evidence are necessary, rigorous evaluations also are required to move forward. Reports on failures and successes should ideally be about equal—documentation of failure is as important as documentation of success, although few may want their failures documented. Information is also needed to predict both short-term and long-term returns on investment.

Suggested Citation:"6 Breakout Groups." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×

RESEARCH

Marita Titler from the University of Iowa summarized the research group’s discussion, which focused primarily on the challenges to be addressed to strengthen quality improvement research.

Fundamental problems with quality improvement center on the fact that the research focuses on a wide range of evaluations, from reviews of individual interventions to entire systems. The heavily disease-oriented evaluations pose additional barriers to performing good research because positive findings cannot be generalized from one disease to another. Part of the inability to compare between interventions for different diseases is the lack of a standard language to share ideas and compare findings.

Other problems in quality improvement research are the methods used. As mentioned throughout the workshop, the contexts in which interventions take place are not well studied or documented. Additionally, there is little guidance on how to balance tradeoffs, such as internal and external validity. It was also noted that multiple methods would be necessary to evaluate cultural change and transformational change. This would require strengthening of research methods, especially qualitative methods. Limited progress has been made in qualitative methods in part because guidelines for how to do so have not been developed and because of their limited acceptance in peer-reviewed journals. Most major journals have word limitations for articles, and qualitative research and comprehensive summaries of methods often exceed those limitations. It was suggested that specific components be written for a major journal and lengthier sections be published in other more focused journals.

The current state of quality improvement research was compared to community-based partnership research a few years ago and clinical research 25 years ago. Sciences evolve and patience needs to be exercised as quality improvement researchers learn from the development of those fields.

Collaboration is needed with researchers in other disciplines, including researchers studying human factors, engineering, and social science. Researchers also need to learn from social and behavioral theorists to better understand the mechanisms of organizational cultural relationships.

The session ended with a note to consider both the costs of implementing interventions and the costs of not understanding the opportunities of quality improvement projects.

Suggested Citation:"6 Breakout Groups." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"6 Breakout Groups." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×
Page 42
Suggested Citation:"6 Breakout Groups." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×
Page 43
Next: 7 Strategic Opportunities »
The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $36.00 Buy Ebook | $28.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) workshop "The Conduct of Health Care Quality Improvement and Implementation Research" was held on May 24-25, 2007, in Irvine, CA. The purpose of this workshop was to gain a better understanding of what is known and not known about quality improvement and implementation research. Experts were asked to identify current methods and best practices as well as areas where future efforts should be concentrated to propel the field. As with its previous workshop, the Forum on the Science of Health Care Quality Improvement and Implementation invited speakers from other disciplines to share their experiences in their respective fields. Although many disciplines are relevant to this topic, not all views could be incorporated because of workshop time constraints, but will be incorporated in the forum's future activities. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views, Workshop Summary describes and summarizes workshop presentations and discussions.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!