National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 8 Opportunities for Change
Suggested Citation:"9 General Reactions." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×

9
General Reactions

The following text summarizes general reactions offered by members of both the forum and the audience during the last session of the workshop.

INFORMATION CAPACITY

Paul Epner of Abbott Laboratories proposed the idea of making information about quality improvements ubiquitous. The capacities of the research system to manage information remain unknown. The system should encourage free exchange of ideas to improve creativity and augment the amount of research being conducted. O’Neill noted that the greatest skill shortage is leadership. Good leaders successfully pick and choose among tools. Epner added that in a more accessible system, people would be able to better identify tools from all that have been attempted.

TRAINING

Diane Rittenhouse of UCSF said that developing skills related to health policy and health services research to be taught to medical students requires a lot of effort. Medical students often are not knowledgeable about quality, cost, access, and variations in care, among other issues. Part of the problem is that there are no models for behaving or teaching in this way. The culture of medicine

Suggested Citation:"9 General Reactions." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×

and medical education must change to support widespread reforms in how medicine is practiced. The patients will benefit from these changes.

BRIDGING THEORY AND PRACTICE

Dougherty commented on potential opportunities to blend the basic science (theoretical side) and applied science (practical side) of quality improvement research. The testing of theories about context and the nature of implementation in real-world settings can help build the basic science, Dougherty said.

Shortell proposed a framework for considering context. The framework focuses on the alignment of four areas: an organization’s strategy, its culture, its technical components, and its structure. First, an intervention must fit in an organization’s overall strategy and be considered a strategic priority to be sustained. Second, support for the intervention must be supported by the organizational culture; otherwise, people will not be able to successfully spread the change throughout the organization. Third, technical components to support the intervention must be in place so that information can be gleaned to assess the change. Fourth, the organization’s structure must be able to support both formal and informal ways of learning to share information. Otherwise, improvements will be suboptimized, with improvements in one division or team, but not throughout the organization. The challenge for systemwide quality improvement is to align all four areas to achieve sustained change.

SYSTEMS CHANGE

Responding to a comment about the risk of attempting quality improvement at the system level when the basic science of quality improvement is not well understood, O’Neill said there are some truths to all organizations, one of which is binary communication. Binary communication allows for only yes or no answers, not maybe, and helps judge a system’s level of organization. Health and medical care has not done a good job of encouraging binary communication, O’Neill said. Better binary communication could decrease chaos in the system and would thus be able to identify leverage points for change.

Characteristics of great organizations hold three virtues, O’Neill proposed. First, every person in the organization should be able to say that he is treated with dignity and respect. If a person is not as valuable or is less valuable than others, he should not be there.

Suggested Citation:"9 General Reactions." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×

Second, every person should be able to say that he has been given everything needed to succeed in terms of training, education, tools, and information. Third, every person should be able to say that someone recognized his efforts. Great organizations are difficult to find, but if they could be identified, huge gains in the value of health and medical care could potentially be captured.

Suggested Citation:"9 General Reactions." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"9 General Reactions." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×
Page 58
Suggested Citation:"9 General Reactions." Institute of Medicine. 2007. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11986.
×
Page 59
Next: References »
The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views: Workshop Summary Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $36.00 Buy Ebook | $28.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) workshop "The Conduct of Health Care Quality Improvement and Implementation Research" was held on May 24-25, 2007, in Irvine, CA. The purpose of this workshop was to gain a better understanding of what is known and not known about quality improvement and implementation research. Experts were asked to identify current methods and best practices as well as areas where future efforts should be concentrated to propel the field. As with its previous workshop, the Forum on the Science of Health Care Quality Improvement and Implementation invited speakers from other disciplines to share their experiences in their respective fields. Although many disciplines are relevant to this topic, not all views could be incorporated because of workshop time constraints, but will be incorporated in the forum's future activities. The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views, Workshop Summary describes and summarizes workshop presentations and discussions.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!