National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix A: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Committee Meetings." National Research Council. 2008. Review of Directed Energy Technology for Countering Rockets, Artillery, and Mortars (RAM): Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12008.
×
Page 19
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Committee Meetings." National Research Council. 2008. Review of Directed Energy Technology for Countering Rockets, Artillery, and Mortars (RAM): Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12008.
×
Page 20
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Committee Meetings." National Research Council. 2008. Review of Directed Energy Technology for Countering Rockets, Artillery, and Mortars (RAM): Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12008.
×
Page 21
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Committee Meetings." National Research Council. 2008. Review of Directed Energy Technology for Countering Rockets, Artillery, and Mortars (RAM): Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12008.
×
Page 22
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Committee Meetings." National Research Council. 2008. Review of Directed Energy Technology for Countering Rockets, Artillery, and Mortars (RAM): Abbreviated Version. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12008.
×
Page 23

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Appendix B Committee Meetings FIRST MEETING January 24-25, 2007 Huntsville, Alabama Meeting Objectives Introduce committee members to the National Academies and the Board on Army Science and Technology; conduct composition and balance discussion; discuss statement of task and sponsor expectations; receive orientation presenta- tions on the mission, organization, and functions of the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command; receive presenta- tions regarding emerging technologies relevant to the statement of task; consider and approve draft outline; and make writing assignments. Presenters Sponsor’s Welcoming Remarks Mark Swinson, Chief Scientist, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command Directed Energy Combat Development Overview Daryl Youngman, U.S. Army Air and Missile Defense Battle Laboratory 19

20 APPENDIX B Joint High Power Solid State Laser (J-HPSSL) Adam Aberle, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command HEL-JTO Overview Don Seeley, Deputy Director, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/ Army Forces Strategic Command Briefing to National Academy of Sciences’ Committee on Directed Energy Technology for Countering Indirect Weapons Daniel Trainor, Textron Corporation High Energy Laser Technology Demonstrator (HEL TD) Weapon System Program Bill Gnacek, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command HELTD Lethality & Systems Assessment Chuck Lamar, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command Introduction Jackie Gish, Northrop Grumman Corporation THEL, MTHEL & HEL Block 0 John Nugent, Northrop Grumman 3 – Laser Segment Jay Marmo, Northrop Grumman Corporation Thermal Management Jackie Gish, Northrop Grumman Corporation SSL Performance Projections Jackie Gish, Northrop Grumman Corporation Summary Jackie Gish, Northrop Grumman Corporation

APPENDIX B 21 SECOND MEETING February 26-27, 2007 Washington, D.C. Meeting Objectives Conduct final composition and balance discussion; continue receiving presen- tations regarding emerging technologies relevant to the statement of task; consider and approve the concept draft report; and make additional writing assignments. Presenters Directed Energy Systems Patrick K. Garvey, Boeing Missile Defense Systems Thin Disk Laser Technology Update to Board on Army Science & Technology Edward W. Pogue, Boeing Missile Defense Systems Counter RAM/Counter ManPADS/Counter Battery Lee Gutheinz, Boeing Missile Defense Systems Modeling & Simulation Edward W. Pogue, Boeing Missile Defense Systems Advanced Tactical Laser (ATL) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) Don Slater, Boeing Missile Defense Systems Directed Energy Systems Power and Energy Systems Gary Grider, DRS-TEM, Inc. Laser Area Defense Near-Term Employment Concept Jim Horkovich, Raytheon Directed Energy Weapons C-RAM Lethality Rusty Graves and Wendell Cook, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command Modeling and Simulation Support to HEL System Development Wendell Cook, BAE Systems Phalanx, Fiber Laser, and Option 1 JHPSSL Frank Brueckner, Raytheon Corporation

22 APPENDIX B The Army’s Hybrid Electric Initiative Gus Khalil, U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center THIRD MEETING April 3-4, 2007 Washington, D.C. Meeting Objectives Conduct final composition and balance discussion; continue receiving p ­ resentations regarding emerging technologies relevant to the statement of task; consider and approve the first full message draft report; and make additional writing assignments. Presenters Long Term Use of a BCS Brian Strickland, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command DPSSL Illuminator Technology Development (and scaling SSLs to higher power) Stephen G. Post, Missile Defense Agency Army Research Laboratory-Enabling Technologies for Directed Energy Solid State Diode Pumped Lasers Gary Woods, U.S. Army Research Laboratory Status of Onshore Produced Ceramic Laser Gain Materials Rick Gentilman, Raytheon Corporation Air Force Laser Programs R. Andrew Motes, U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory Extended Area Protection & Survivability (EAPS) System Sensor Suite Requirements, Radars for C-RAM Jim Mullins, Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center C-RAM and Force Encampment Protection System (FEPS) Programs Pete Kirkland, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command

APPENDIX B 23 Advanced Tactical Technology–High Energy Lasers Stephen Welby, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Lockheed Martin DE Overview Kenneth W. Billman, Lockheed Martin Corporation J-HPSSL Phase 3 (Option-1) Conceptual Design for ThinZag® Laser on an FCS-Like Ground Vehicle Chas. W. von Rosenberg, Jr., Textron ����������� Corporation FOURTH MEETING May 7-8, 2007 Irvine, CALIFORNIA Meeting Objectives Continue deliberations on the report; come to agreement on the findings and recommendations; prepare necessary written input; determine whether sensitive appendix is required; concur that the report is ready for peer review. Presenters None

Next: Appendix C: Abbreviations and Acronyms »
Review of Directed Energy Technology for Countering Rockets, Artillery, and Mortars (RAM): Abbreviated Version Get This Book
×
 Review of Directed Energy Technology for Countering Rockets, Artillery, and Mortars (RAM): Abbreviated Version
Buy Paperback | $21.00 Buy Ebook | $16.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The United States Army is looking for ways to defend against missile and mortar attacks. In this book, the National Research Council assesses a plan to create a 100 kW mobile, solid-state, laser weapon that could defend an area several kilometers in diameter.

The NRC provides several recommendations:

  • A 100 kW Laser is of limited value, so the program's goal should be a 400 kW weapon.
  • The Army should proceed with the program in stages, focusing first on a rugged transportable platform for the weapon using existing 25 kW laser technology, then directing resources toward 100kW and 400 kW weapons.
  • The Army should perform a detailed, quantitative study of the effectiveness of a high energy, solid-state laser weapon against future threats.
  • The Army should continue to participate in U.S.-based and international research on high-energy lasers and related equipment. The committee found substantial benefits for the Army's solid-state laser program from other programs outside the Army.
  • The Army should conduct risk-assessments that investigate the effects that a high energy laser may have on other airborne platforms in the vicinity of the target.
  • The Army should study eye safety for both the operators of the laser and for civilians. The results of these studies should be integrated into the development of the weapon.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!