Knowledge of the basic interaction mechanisms of radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs) with cellular and subcellular (molecular) structures provides a basis for extrapolation of existing knowledge to future technologies and exposure conditions. Thus, research on interaction mechanisms is an important topic and a relevant part of most research programs worldwide. In Europe and the United States, such research has been ongoing for decades.
Some of the interaction mechanisms that have been identified so far are well understood and widely accepted. Those include mechanisms that lead to thermal effects in biological tissues and forces exerted at high field strengths that result in dielectrophoresis,1 electroporation,2 and pearl chain formation3 of cells (Schwan 1982, 1985; Holzapfel et al. 1982). The responses of cells to elevated temperature are well documented and seem to be independent from the heating source. The electroporation effects are technically used, for example in pharmacology and for basic scientific research in the integration of external DNA into cells. For wireless communication devices electroporation is not relevant as it becomes significant
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 33
Mechanisms
Knowledge of the basic interaction mechanisms of radiofrequency (RF)
electromagnetic fields (EMFs) with cellular and subcellular (molecular)
structures provides a basis for extrapolation of existing knowledge to fu-
ture technologies and exposure conditions. Thus, research on interaction
mechanisms is an important topic and a relevant part of most research
programs worldwide. In Europe and the United States, such research has
been ongoing for decades.
Some of the interaction mechanisms that have been identified so far
are well understood and widely accepted. Those include mechanisms that
lead to thermal effects in biological tissues and forces exerted at high
field strengths that result in dielectrophoresis,1 electroporation,2 and pearl
chain formation3 of cells (Schwan 1982, 1985; Holzapfel et al. 1982). The
responses of cells to elevated temperature are well documented and seem
to be independent from the heating source. The electroporation effects
are technically used, for example in pharmacology and for basic scientific
research in the integration of external DNA into cells. For wireless com-
munication devices electroporation is not relevant as it becomes significant
1 Dielectrophoresis is defined as the lateral motion imparted on uncharged particles as a
result of polarization induced by nonuniform electric fields.
2 Electroporation is a mechanical method used to introduce polar molecules into a host cell
through the cell membrane. In this procedure, a large electric pulse temporarily disturbs the
phospholipid bilayer, allowing molecules like DNA to pass into the cell.
3 Chains of living or nonliving particles (pearl chains) form along the lines of force of electro-
magnetic fields (including RF fields).
OCR for page 33
IDENTIFICATION OF RESEARCH NEEDS
only at very high field strengths. The minimum RF signal that can modify
the transport of ions and molecules is an open question.
The basic question still under debate is whether there are other inter-
action mechanisms of low-intensity RF electromagnetic fields that could
have health consequences. Of particular interest is the possible existence of
health effects that occur due to the accumulation of multiple, long-term,
low-intensity RF exposures.
Currently, the most appropriate ways to answer these basic questions
include the use of biophysical4 (theoretical), biochemical, and biological ap-
proaches. At the physical and chemical levels, the prime goal is to identify
a candidate mechanism that could overcome the various sources of “noise”
in the biological system.
From the biochemical and biological perspective, two approaches were
suggested at the workshop to identify mechanisms that may be operating
at low exposures:
Successive- or multiple-hypothesis testing based on hazard mecha-
•
nisms or stress responses that are relevant for cancer (Roti Roti 2007). The
pitfall of this approach seems to be that the number of parameters to be
tested is high and not all parameters are known.
The use of high-throughput screening methods (Leszczynski 2007)
•
such as genomics,5 proteomics,6 metabolomics,7 and others not yet devel-
oped (the so called “-omics”). Such methods have already been used in
EMF research programs. The pitfall of these methods is the very high num-
ber of reactions that might be detected. Many of those reactions might be
of no relevance or be false positives. Thus all findings need to be validated
using complementary methods.
From the biophysical perspective a series of mechanisms has been
suggested by various investigators. Those mechanisms include but are not
limited to:
4A biophysical approach is one that applies physical principles and methods to biological
problems.
5 Genomics is a branch of biotechnology concerned with applying the techniques of genetics
and molecular biology to the genetic mapping and DNA sequencing of sets of genes or the
complete genomes of selected organisms using high-speed methods.
6 Proteomics is a branch of biotechnology concerned with applying the techniques of molecu-
lar biology, biochemistry, and genetics to analyzing the structure, function, and interactions
of the proteins produced by the genes of a particular cell, tissue, or organism, including the
organization of the information in databases.
7 Metabolomics is the systematic study of the unique chemical fingerprints that specific
cellular processes leave behind—specifically, the study of their small-molecule metabolite
profiles.
OCR for page 33
MECHANISMS
Temperature rise (“heating”),
•
voltage-gated ion channels (includes action potential-related
•
channels),
ion channel electro-denaturation,
•
membrane enzyme electro-conformational coupling,
•
magnetically sensitive radical pair reactions,
•
magnetite-based mechanical coupling, and
•
temporary membrane pore creation.
•
None of these possible mechanisms has so far been positively identified as
a candidate for causation of health effect.
Testing for the sensitivity of the central nervous system (CNS) to detect
modulated RF signals using the pattern recognition capability of the brain
and neural networks would improve our understanding of the minimum
signal level that biological systems can sense and distinguish from back-
ground noise.
It was noted at the workshop that mechanisms can be modeled theo-
retically with the use of software-based nonlinear cell models that describe
field-induced molecular changes (Weaver 2007; Gowrishankar et al. 2006).
It was also noted (D’Inzeo 2007) that investigation of doses occurring on
the microscopic level may lead to a better understanding of possible interac-
tions of RF electromagnetic fields on the cellular and subcellular level. The
utility of this observation is supported by recent findings (Barnes and Kwan
2005) that suggest a higher energy absorption at the microscopic scale, e.g.,
at the boundary between cellular structures with different dielectric proper-
ties. Several national and international expert groups, including the World
Health Organization, have requested more research into micro-dosimetry
and appropriate dielectric models as a medium- to long-term research need.
Some research programs in Europe already include such investigations.
It is unclear whether low-level RF exposure can trigger effects through
stimulation of cellular thermo-receptors. It is also currently unclear if a non-
linear biological mechanism exists that could lead to demodulation effects.
As a result, different modulations and wave characteristics would affect
biological systems differently. There is some research with respect to this
question underway, such as an experiment being conducted in the UK.8
Knowledge is lacking concerning the effects of electromagnetic fields on
ion and molecular transport through the cell membrane. Work is ongoing at
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the outcome should be eval-
uated before further work is initiated (Weaver and Chizmadzhev 2006).
8 http://www.mthr.org.uk/research_projects/HO_funded_projects_excell.htm Accessed Sep-
tember 20, 2007.
OCR for page 33
IDENTIFICATION OF RESEARCH NEEDS
The committee’s evaluation of presentations and discussions at the
workshop has resulted in the identification of the following research needs
and gaps.
Research Needs
1. Effects of RF electromagnetic fields on neural networks are re-
search needs. There are indications that neural networks are a sensitive
biological target.
2. Investigations of doses occurring on the microscopic level are
needed to better understand possible interactions of RF electromagnetic
fields on the cellular and subcellular level. Several national and inter-
national expert groups, including the World Health Organization, have
requested more research into micro-dosimetry and appropriate dielectric
models as a medium- to long-term research need.
Research Gaps
Research Ongoing
1. Mechanisms that can be modeled theoretically with the use of
software-based nonlinear cell models that describe field-induced molecular
changes. It is currently unclear if a nonlinear biological mechanism exists
that could lead to demodulation effects. There is some research with respect
to this question underway.
Judged to Be of Lower Priority
2. It is unclear whether low-level RF exposure can trigger effects
through stimulation of cellular thermo-receptors.
3. Knowledge is lacking concerning the effects of electromagnetic
fields on ion and molecular transport through the cell membrane.