National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$54.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

An Assessment of Small Business Innovation Research Program at the Department of Energy (2008)

Citation Manager

. "Summary." An Assessment of Small Business Innovation Research Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
10
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy
  • Produce enhanced reports on the program for DoE management and the Congress.

    • DoE should provide Congress with a summary annual report on the SBIR program. This should include descriptive statistics for applications, awards, and outcomes along the dimensions identified in this report, including knowledge creation, technology innovation, and impact on agency mission, as well as commercialization.

  • Conduct regular internal and external assessments.28

    • As part of this assessment process, DoE should produce regular reports from the commercialization database. In addition to improved internal assessment capabilities that can be used to enhance program operations, DoE should also commission regular external arms-length evaluations to assess the program progress.

  • Consider the creation of an advisory board.29

    • DoE should consider the creation of an independent advisory board that draws together senior agency management, SBIR managers, and other stakeholders as well as outside experts to review current operations and achievements and, as appropriate, recommend changes to the SBIR program.

  • Provide additional management funding.30

    • Managing what should be a data-driven program requires high quality data and systematic assessment, which in turn requires appropriate funding. Increased funding is also needed to provide effective oversight, including site visits, program review, systematic third-party assessments, and other necessary management activities.

28

See related Recommendation F in Chapter 2.

29

See related Recommendation H in Chapter 2.

30

See related Recommendation G in Chapter 2.

Page
10