National Academies Press: OpenBook

An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy (2008)

Chapter: Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data

« Previous: 8 Program Management
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 111
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 112
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 113
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 114
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 115
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 116
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 117
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 118
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 119
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 120
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 121
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 122
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 123
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 124
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 125
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 126
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 127
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 128
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 129
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 130
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 131
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 132
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 133
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: DoE SBIR Program Data." National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12052.
×
Page 134

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Appendixes

Appendix A DoE SBIR Program Data TABLE APP-A-1  Phase I Awards Fiscal Number of Average Maximum Total Phase I Year Phase I Awards Award Size ($) Award Size ($) Award Dollars 1992 196 49,765 50,000 9,753,886 1993 167 74,076 75,000 12,370,630 1994 209 74,363 75,000 15,541,961 1995 196 74,570 75,000 14,615,796 1996 167 74,795 75,000 12,490,776 1997 194 74,099 75,000 14,375,212 1998 204 74,669 75,000 15,232,440 1999 185 99,432 99,999 18,394,937 2000 292 68,152 99,998 19,900,505 2001 310 68,166 99,999 21,131,432 2002 328 68,894 99,999 22,597,310 2003 323 67,876 99,999 21,923,938 2004 257 95,325 99,999 24,498,613 2005 258 99,449 99,999 25,657,718 Total 3,286     248,485,154 SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech-Net Database. 113

114 APPENDIX A TABLE APP-A-2  Phase I Awards to Minority-Owned Businesses Fiscal Number of Average Maximum Total Phase I Year Phase I Awards Award Size ($) Award Size ($) Award Dollars 1992 20 50,000 50,000 1,000,000 1993 21 74,440 75,000 1,563,235 1994 23 74,919 75,000 1,723,137 1995 23 74,917 75,000 1,723,093 1996 23 74,800 75,000 1,720,398 1997 33 74,621 75,000 2,462,480 1998 34 74,723 75,000 2,540,584 1999 32 99,019 99,991 3,168,602 2000 46 62,888 99,997 2,892,843 2001 39 74,216 99,996 2,894,424 2002 37 62,040 99,988 2,295,495 2003 34 85,256 99,999 2,898,695 2004 31 95,535 99,997 2,961,589 2005 39 99,954 99,999 3,898,224 SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech-Net Database. TABLE APP-A-3  Phase I Awards to Woman-Owned Businesses Fiscal Number of Average Maximum Total Phase I Year Phase I Awards Award Size ($) Award Size ($) Award Dollars 1992 8 50,000 50,000 400,000 1993 17 73,621 75,000 1,251,555 1994 18 74,897 75,000 1,348,142 1995 5 70,964 75,000 354,818 1996 9 74,777 75,000 672,991 1997 18 74,644 75,000 1,343,594 1998 14 74,925 75,000 1,048,951 1999 19 98,671 99,997 1,874,754 2000 24 70,803 99,997 1,699,276 2001 25 67,989 99,999 1,699,728 2002 18 66,240 99,988 1,192,327 2003 25 75,144 99,997 1,878,605 2004 19 98,074 99,999 1,863,400 2005 33 99,578 99,998 3,286,065 SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech-Net Database.

APPENDIX A 115 TABLE APP-A-4  Phase I Awards, by State Number of Number of State Phase I Awards State Phase I Awards AL 20 769 CA 704 AR 8 609 MA 569 AZ 65 308 CO 311 CA 704 218 CT 185 CO 311 126 NY 123 CT 185 114 TX 121 DC 1 113 NJ 113 DE 32 105 VA 113 FL 42 102 OH 97 GA 22 97 WA 83 HI 1 79 NM 82 IA 3 78 PA 72 IL 64 72 MD 69 IN 16 70 AZ 65 KS 7 69 IL 64 KY 4 57 TN 64 LA 3 54 UT 55 MA 569 50 FL 42 MD 69 48 MI 41 ME 7 36 DE 32 MI 41 34 OR 32 MN 25 30 NC 27 MO 6 29 MN 25 MS 1 28 GA 22 MT 11 27 NH 22 NC 27 22 AL 20 ND 3 17 WI 17 NE 3 15 IN 16 NH 22 12 MT 11 NJ 113 9 OK 11 NM 82 9 AR 8 NV 8 9 NV 8 NY 123 8 KS 7 OH 97 6 ME 7 OK 11 6 VT 7 OR 32 5 MO 6 PA 72 3 WV 6 RI 2 3 WY 5 SC 3 3 KY 4 TN 64 3 IA 3 TX 121 3 LA 3 UT 55 3 ND 3 VA 113 2 NE 3 VT 7 1 SC 3 WA 83 1 RI 2 WI 17 1 DC 1 WV 6 1 HI 1 WY 5 1 MS 1 TotalTTToo1 3,286 SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech-Net Database.

116 APPENDIX A TABLE APP-A-5  Phase I Awards in Massachusetts, by Town/City Number of City Phase I Awards Waltham 81 Summary Watertown 60 48 towns win 1 award Bedford 52 Top 5 towns 278 Andover 46 Top 5 % 45.6% Shrewsbury 39 Somerville 33 Westborough 28   Burlington 27   Norwood 23   Cambridge 20   Billerica 19   Woburn 19 Turners Falls 18 Marlborough 15 Natick 12 Lowell 11 Newton 10 Boston 9 East Falmouth 8 Lexington 8 Concord 6 Littleton 6 Chelmsford 5 Sturbridge 5 Wilmington 5 Amherst 4 Belmont 4 Topsfield 4 Duxbury 3 Holliston 3 Needham Heights 3 Willmington 3 Allston 2 Forestdale 2 Salem 2 Wayland 2 Acton 1 Boxboro 1 Brookline 1 Chatham 1 Danvers 1 Dedham 1 North Chelmsford 1 North Falmouth 1 South Deerfield 1 Tewksbury 1 Wakefield 1 Wellesley 1 Total 609 SOURCE: Department of Energy.

APPENDIX A 117 TABLE APP-A-6  Phase I Awards, by Company Number of Company Phase I Awards Total Dollars Physical Optics Corporation 45 3,824,563 TDA Research, Inc. 40 3,249,287 Omega-p, Inc. 39 3,449,995 Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc. 39 3,350,000 Eltron Research, Inc. 36 2,974,855 Physical Sciences, Inc. 34 2,723,934 Membrane Technology and Research, Inc. 32 2,599,619 Supercon, Inc. 30 2,474,763 ADA Technologies, Inc. 27 2,273,683 MER Corporation 25 2,074,875 Ceramem Corporation 25 2,225,000 Tech-x Corporation 23 2,198,739 Fm Technologies, Inc. 21 1,649,531 Hypres, Inc. 20 1,598,387 Advanced Fuel Research, Inc. 20 1,522,906 Science Research Laboratory, Inc. 19 1,498,107 American Superconductor Corporation 19 1,550,000 Lynntech, Inc. 18 1,566,346 Spire Corporation 17 1,241,391 Calabazas Creek Research 17 1,575,000 Top 20 companies total 546 45,620,981 All 3,286 69,069,709 SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech-Net Database.

118 APPENDIX A TABLE APP-A-7  Phase I Awards, by Zip Code Number of Zip code Phase I Awards Summary 80301 103 Top 20 965 90501 72 Next 30 575 80033 64 Next 50 515 92121 63 All others 1,410 06520 56 02472 55 02453 53 01730 52 94025 49 80127 48 01810 46 85706 41 01545 39 95054 34 20151 34 02143 33 06108 32 10523 32 77840 30 95070 29 90275 28 01581 28 01803 27 91324 27 37830 24 02062 23 06704 22 97701 21 90505 21 87109 21 80501 20 06813 20 80026 19 01821 19 01801 19 02451 18 01376 18 48108 17 94086 16 08852 16 30341 16 03755 16 87505 16 06810 15 06473 15 SOURCE: Department of Energy.

APPENDIX A 119 TABLE APP-A-8  Phase II Awards Fiscal Number of Average Maximum Total Phase II Year Phase II Awards Award Size ($) Award Size ($) Award Dollars 1992 66 488,010 500,000 32,208,670 1993 72 498,793 500,000 35,913,116 1994 61 596,332 600,000 36,376,260 1995 77 725,065 750,000 55,829,971 1996 70 734,996 750,000 51,449,732 1997 82 722,697 750,000 59,261,141 1998 83 741,516 750,000 61,545,841 1999 85 696,165 750,000 59,174,004 2000 91 711,715 750,000 64,766,071 2001 98 676,185 900,000 66,266,094 2002 103 694,454 750,000 71,528,733 2003 103 706,382 892,342 72,757,388 2004 115 719,961 750,000 82,795,485 2005 107 699,557 750,060 74,852,565 Total 1,213 824,725,071 SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech-Net Database. TABLE APP-A-9  Phase II Awards to Minority-Owned Businesses Fiscal Number of Average Maximum Total Phase II Year Phase II Awards Award Size ($) Award Size ($) Award Dollars 1992 11 478,175 500,000 5,259,929 1993 8 495,534 500,000 3,964,271 1994 9 599,976 600,000 5,399,783 1995 10 727,726 750,000 7,277,262 1996 8 745,948 750,000 5,967,580 1997 7 692,941 750,000 4,850,585 1998 11 749,629 750,000 8,245,924 1999 12 688,043 750,000 8,256,518 2000 17 701,433 750,000 11,924,363 2001 10 698,000 900,000 6,980,004 2002 14 709,941 750,000 9,939,167 2003 5 649,840 749,996 3,249,199 2004 12 733,284 750,000 8,799,409 2005 13 709,913 750,000 9,228,865 SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech-Net Database.

120 APPENDIX A TABLE APP-A-10  Phase II Awards to Woman-Owned Businesses Fiscal Number of Average Maximum Total Phase II Year Phase II Awards Award Size ($) Award Size ($) Award Dollars 1992 2 497,229 498,766 994,457 1993 1 500,000 500,000 500,000 1994 6 599,910 600,000 3,599,461 1995 9 749,966 750,000 6,749,696 1996 1 749,994 749,994 749,994 1997 4 712,408 750,000 2,849,630 1998 5 709,728 750,000 3,548,641 1999 6 687,239 750,000 4,123,432 2000 7 674,999 750,000 4,724,995 2001 8 712,377 900,000 5,699,018 2002 6 716,221 750,000 4,297,324 2003 6 739,434 892,342 4,436,602 2004 11 740,873 750,000 8,149,604 2005 6 683,979 749,868 4,103,872 SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech-Net Database. TABLE APP-A-11  Phase II Average Awards, by Demographic Average Award Size ($) Fiscal Year All Awards Minority Women 1992 488,010 478,175 497,229 1993 498,793 495,534 500,000 1994 596,332 599,976 599,910 1995 725,065 727,726 749,966 1996 734,996 745,948 749,994 1997 722,697 692,941 712,408 1998 741,516 749,629 709,728 1999 696,165 688,043 687,239 2000 711,715 701,433 674,999 2001 676,185 698,000 712,377 2002 694,454 709,941 716,221 2003 706,382 649,840 739,434 2004 719,961 733,284 740,873 2005 699,557 709,913 683,979 SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech-Net Database.

APPENDIX A 121 TABLE APP-A-12  Phase II Awards, by State Number of Number of State Phase II Awards State Phase II Awards AL 9 CA 287 AR 3 MA 199 AZ 25 CO 116 CA 287 CT 74 CO 116 VA 45 CT 74 NJ 42 DC 0 NY 42 DE 10 OH 35 FL 15 TX 35 GA 6 WA 35 HI 0 NM 30 IA 0 PA 27 IL 18 TN 27 IN 4 AZ 25 KS 3 MD 24 KY 2 OR 19 LA 0 IL 18 MA 199 UT 16 MD 24 FL 15 ME 2 MI 14 MI 14 DE 10 MN 8 NC 10 MO 2 NH 10 MS 0 AL 9 MT 4 MN 8 NC 10 GA 6 ND 0 WI 6 NE 0 IN 4 NH 10 MT 4 NJ 42 AR 3 NM 30 KS 3 NV 1 WV 3 NY 42 KY 2 OH 35 ME 2 OK 2 MO 2 OR 19 OK 2 PA 27 NV 1 RI 1 RI 1 SC 1 SC 1 TN 27 VT 1 TX 35 DC 0 UT 16 HI 0 VA 45 IA 0 VT 1 LA 0 WA 35 MS 0 WI 6 ND 0 WV 3 NE 0 WY 0   WY 0 Total 1,213 SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech-Net Database.

122 APPENDIX A TABLE APP-A-13  Top Phase II Award Winners (Plus Ties) Number of Phase II Dollars Company Phase II Awards Awarded Physical Optics Corporation 21 14,399,812 TDA Research, Inc. 21 14,850,271 Omega-p, Inc. 18 12,650,000 Eltron Research, Inc. 18 12,099,295 MER Corporation 15 10,019,266 Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc. 14 10,349,999 Membrane Technology and Research, Inc. 14 9,923,405 Fm Technologies, Inc. 13 9,099,404 Ceramem Corporation 13 9,200,000 Science Research Laboratory, Inc. 12 7,949,428 Calabazas Creek Research 12 7,395,865 Physical Sciences, Inc. 12 7,966,660 Tech-x Corporation 11 7,843,709 Duly Research, Inc. 11 7,699,508 Hypres, Inc. 10 6,599,415 Diversified Technologies, Inc. 10 6,436,557 American Superconductor Corporation 9 6,600,000 ADA Technologies, Inc. 9 6,299,009 Haimson Research Corporation 9 6,079,745 Bend Research, Inc. 8 4,184,884 Lynntech, Inc. 8 5,824,154 Fuelcell Energy, Inc. 8 5,249,873 Advanced Fuel Research, Inc. 8 5,136,686 Igc Advanced Superconductors, Inc. 8 4,849,929 Supercon, Inc. 8 4,599,731 Spire Corporation 8 5,494,425 Total 308 208,801,030 All awards 1,213 824,725,071 Top 20 Percentage of total 25.4 25.3 SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech-Net Database.

APPENDIX A 123 TABLE APP-A-14  Phase I Applications Fiscal Number of Number of Total Number of Phase I Years Declines Awards Phase I Applications Success Rate (%) 1992 1,330 198 1,529 12.9 1993 2,296 200 2,495 8.0 1994 2,060 212 2,272 9.3 1995 1,369 199 1,568 12.7 1996 1,257 173 1,429 12.1 1997 1,021 199 1,220 16.3 1998 986 206 1,190 17.3 1999 933 203 1,133 17.9 2000 870 202 1,081 18.7 2001 674 213 897 23.7 2002 728 228 966 23.6 2003 996 219 1,223 17.9 Total 14,520 2,452 17,003 SOURCE: Department of Energy.

124 APPENDIX A TABLE APP-A-15  Phase I Applications—Woman-Owned Businesses  Agency Data Responses  Fiscal Total Share of Year Yes Blank No Applications Applications (%) 1992 144 1,385   1,529 9.4 1993 293 2,202   2,495 11.7 1994 271 2,001   2,272 11.9 1995 166 1,401   1,567 10.6 1996 148 1,131 150 1,429 10.4 1997 158 739 323 1,220 13.0 1998 132 44 1,014 1,190 11.1 1999 94 26 1,013 1,133 8.3 2000 123 48 910 1,081 11.4 2001 69 21 807 897 7.7 2002 68 34 864 966 7.0 2003 114 28 1,081 1,223 9.3 Total 1,780 9,060 6,162 17,002 SOURCE: Department of Energy. TABLE APP-A-16  Phase I Applications—Minority-Owned Businesses Agency Data Responses  Fiscal Number of Total Share of Year Yes No Blank Awards Applications Applications (%) 1992 442 2,053 20 2,515 17.6 1993 370 1,901 23 2,294 16.1 1994 235 1,333 23 1,591 14.8 1995 241 1,288 24 1,553 15.5 1996 223 704 293 26 1,246 17.9 1997 233 1,047 149 34 1,463 15.9 1998 193 843 45 34 1,115 17.3 1999 194 951 45 33 1,223 15.9 2000 151 784 31 30 996 15.2 2001 223 971 29 28 1,251 17.8 2002 185 923 25 22 1,155 16.0 2003 162 714 21 27 924 17.5 Total 2,852 6,937 7,213 324 17,326 16.5 SOURCE: Department of Energy.

TABLE APP-A-17  Phase I Applications—Success Rates by Demographics Fiscal Number of Declines Number of Awards Total Number of Applications Year Woman Minority All Others All Woman Minority All Others All Woman Minority All Others All 1992 144 442 943 1,529 13 20 165 198 157 462 1,108 1,727 1993 293 370 1,832 2,495 17 23 160 200 310 393 1,992 2,695 1994 271 235 1,766 2,272 18 23 171 212 289 258 1,937 2,484 1995 166 241 1,161 1,568 12 24 163 199 178 265 1,324 1,767 1996 148 223 1,058 1,429 13 26 134 173 161 249 1,192 1,602 1997 158 233 829 1,220 21 34 144 199 179 267 973 1,419 1998 132 193 865 1,190 14 34 158 206 146 227 1,023 1,396 1999 94 194 845 1,133 23 33 147 203 117 227 992 1,336 2000 123 151 807 1,081 17 30 155 202 140 181 962 1,283 2001 69 223 605 897 13 28 172 213 82 251 777 1,110 2002 68 185 713 966 12 22 194 228 80 207 907 1,194 2003 114 162 947 1,223 18 27 174 219 132 189 1,121 1,442 Total 1,780 2,852 12,371 17,003 191 324 1,937 2,452 1,971 3,176 14,308 19,455 Fiscal Application Shares (%) Success Rates (%) Year Woman Minority All Others All Woman Minority All Others All 1992 9.1 26.8 64.2 100 9.0 4.5 17.5 12.9 1993 11.5 14.6 73.9 100 5.8 6.2 8.7 8.0 1994 11.6 10.4 78.0 100 6.6 9.8 9.7 9.3 1995 10.1 15.0 74.9 100 7.2 10.0 14.0 12.7 1996 10.0 15.5 74.4 100 8.8 11.7 12.7 12.1 1997 12.6 18.8 68.6 100 13.3 14.6 17.4 16.3 1998 10.5 16.3 73.3 100 10.6 17.6 18.3 17.3 1999 8.8 17.0 74.3 100 24.5 17.0 17.4 17.9 2000 10.9 14.1 75.0 100 13.8 19.9 19.2 18.7 2001 7.4 22.6 70.0 100 18.8 12.6 28.4 23.7 2002 6.7 17.3 76.0 100 17.6 11.9 27.2 23.6 2003 9.2 13.1 77.7 100 15.8 16.7 18.4 17.9 Average 12.7 12.7 17.4 15.9 125 SOURCE: Department of Energy.

TABLE APP-A-18  Phase I Applications, by State 126 Alphabetical Sorted by Number of Applications Number of Number of Number of Number of State Applications Awards Success Rate (%) State Applications Awards Success Rate (%) AK 7 0.0 CA 3,052 516 16.9 AL 181 15 8.3 MA 2,182 440 20.2 AR 82 7 8.5 CO 1,157 217 18.8 AZ 473 46 9.7 TX 788 80 10.2 CA 3,052 516 16.9 VA 776 78 10.1 CO 1,157 217 18.8 CT 694 150 21.6 CT 694 150 21.6 NY 636 90 14.2 DC 17 0.0 OH 604 71 11.8 DE 133 21 15.8 NJ 588 82 13.9 EC 1 0.0 PA 540 55 10.2 FL 361 25 6.9 NM 512 72 14.1 GA 160 21 13.1 MD 506 49 9.7 HI 18 1 5.6 AZ 473 46 9.7 IA 60 3 5.0 IL 471 46 9.8 ID 50 0.0 FL 361 25 6.9 IL 471 46 9.8 WA 343 55 16.0 IN 80 12 15.0 UT 333 41 12.3 IO 1 0.0 TN 324 53 16.4 KS 43 4 9.3 MI 253 35 13.8 KY 41 5 12.2 AL 181 15 8.3 LA 72 3 4.2 OR 178 33 18.5 MA 2,182 440 20.2 MN 166 20 12.0 MD 506 49 9.7 GA 160 21 13.1 ME 62 7 11.3 NC 151 23 15.2 MI 253 35 13.8 OK 145 8 5.5 MN 166 20 12.0 NH 140 21 15.0

MO 75 2 2.7 DE 133 21 15.8 MS 23 1 4.3 WI 100 11 11.0 MT 89 9 10.1 MT 89 9 10.1 NC 151 23 15.2 AR 82 7 8.5 ND 36 3 8.3 IN 80 12 15.0 NE 9 1 11.1 MO 75 2 2.7 NH 140 21 15.0 LA 72 3 4.2 NJ 588 82 13.9 ME 62 7 11.3 NM 512 72 14.1 IA 60 3 5.0 NV 45 5 11.1 WY 50 3 6.0 NY 636 90 14.2 ID 50   0.0 OH 604 71 11.8 SC 49 2 4.1 OK 145 8 5.5 NV 45 5 11.1 OR 178 33 18.5 KS 43 4 9.3 PA 540 55 10.2 KY 41 5 12.2 PR 18 0.0 VT 41 3 7.3 RI 26 1 3.8 WV 37 5 13.5 SC 49 2 4.1 ND 36 3 8.3 SD 21 0.0 RI 26 1 3.8 TN 324 53 16.4 MS 23 1 4.3 TX 788 80 10.2 SD 21   0.0 UT 333 41 12.3 HI 18 1 5.6 VA 776 78 10.1 PR 18   0.0 VT 41 3 7.3 DC 17   0.0 WA 343 55 16.0 NE 9 1 11.1 WI 100 11 11.0 AK 7   0.0 WV 37 5 13.5 EC 1   0.0 WY 50 3 6.0 IO 1   0.0 Other 3 1 33.3 All 9.7 Total 17,003 127 SOURCE: Department of Energy.

128 APPENDIX A TABLE APP-A-19  Phase I Applications and Success Rates, by Company Top 20 (Plus Ties) Number of Number of Success Company Applications Awards Rate (%) Eltron Research, Inc. 297 36 12.1   Physical Optics Corporation, Electro-optics 220 45 20.5   & Holo MER Corporation 218 25 11.5   Lynntech, Inc. 150 18 12.0   Advanced Fuel Research, Inc. 142 20 14.1   Physical Sciences, Inc. 137 34 24.8   TDA Research, Inc. 125 40 32.0   Spire Corporation 124 17 13.7   Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc. 94 39 41.5   American Superconductor Corporation 90 19 21.1   Materials Modification, Inc. 89 1 1.1 * Membrane Technology and Research, Inc. 89 32 36.0 Ceramem Corporation 87 25 28.7 Foster-Miller, Inc. 87 14 16.1   Nanomaterials Research Corporation 87 14 16.1   ADA Technologies, Inc. 83 27 32.5 Technology International Incorporated 82 0 0.0 ** Tpl, Inc. 80 13 16.3   Supercon, Inc. 78 30 38.5   Ultramet 76 11 14.5 Average 20.1     Summary Top 20 average 20.1% Without * and ** 20.3% All applicants 12.6% SOURCE: Department of Energy. Notes: (*) Technology International Inc. may not be a high level research company; (**) Materials Modification Inc. is a very high level research company, with many federal and commercial cus­ tomers, plus R&D awards.

APPENDIX A 129 TABLE APP-A-20  Phase II Applications Fiscal Year Number of Applications Number of Awards Success Rate (%) 1992 159 66 41.5 1993 180 70 38.9 1994 183 72 39.3 1995 192 81 42.2 1996 171 72 42.1 1997 150 85 56.7 1998 174 85 48.9 1999 179 88 49.2 2000 184 91 49.5 2001 178 98 55.1 2002 189 103 54.5 2003 207 102 49.3 Total 2,146 SOURCE: Department of Energy. TABLE APP-A-21  Phase II Applications from Woman-Owned Companies  Agency Data Responses Percent Share Fiscal Year Yes Blank No All Others All of Total 1995 17 175 175 192 8.9 1996 11 160 160 171 6.4 1997 12 13 125 138 150 8.0 1998 19 41 114 155 174 10.9 1999 12 6 161 167 179 6.7 2000 22 6 156 162 184 12.0 2001 12 8 158 166 178 6.7 2002 10 4 175 179 189 5.3 2003 12 8 187 195 207 5.8 SOURCE: Department of Energy. TABLE APP-A-22  Phase II Applications—Minority-Owned Businesses  Agency Data Responses Percent of All Fiscal Year Yes Blank No All Others All Applications 1995 21 170 170 191 11.0 1996 23 148 148 171 13.5 1997 21 12 117 129 150 14.0 1998 30 37 107 144 174 17.2 1999 27 6 146 152 179 15.1 2000 29 7 148 155 184 15.8 2001 26 8 144 152 178 14.6 2002 23 4 162 166 189 12.2 2003 22 8 177 185 207 10.6 SOURCE: Department of Energy.

TABLE APP-A-23  Phase II Applications, by State 130 Ordered Alphabetically Ordered by Applications Number of Number of Success Rate Number of Success Rate State Applications Awards (%) State Applications Awards (%) AL 14 7 50.0   CA 472 22.0% 53.6 AR 6 2 33.3   MA 386 18.0% 43.8 AZ 41 23 56.1   CO 190 8.9% 47.9 CA 472 253 53.6   CT 131 6.1% 51.9 CO 190 91 47.9   NY 76 3.5% 47.4 CT 131 68 51.9   NJ 66 3.1% 48.5 DE 18 7 38.9   NM 64 3.0% 39.1 FL 24 11 45.8   OH 63 2.9% 49.2 GA 18 6 33.3   TX 60 2.8% 41.7 HI 1 0 0.0   VA 57 2.7% 61.4 IA 3 0 0.0 TN 55 2.6% 47.3 IL 34 11 32.4 PA 48 2.2% 35.4 IN 11 3 27.3   WA 48 2.2% 47.9 KS 2 1 50.0   AZ 41 1.9% 56.1 KY 2 1 50.0   MD 41 1.9% 51.2 LA 3 0 0.0 UT 39 1.8% 33.3 MA 386 169 43.8   IL 34 1.6% 32.4 MD 41 21 51.2   MI 33 1.5% 39.4 ME 6 2 33.3   OR 32 1.5% 53.1 MI 33 13 39.4   FL 24 1.1% 45.8 MN 18 10 55.6   NC 20 0.9% 55.0 MO 1 0 0.0 NH 20 0.9% 0.0 MS 1 0 0.0 DE 18 0.8% 38.9 MT 5 3 60.0   GA 18 0.8% 33.3 NC 20 11 55.0   MN 18 0.8% 55.6 ND 3 0 0.0 AL 14 0.7% 50.0

NE 1 0 0.0 IN 11 0.5% 27.3 NH 20 0 0.0   WI 10 0.5% 60.0 NJ 66 32 48.5   OK 7 0.3% 14.3 NM 64 25 39.1   AR 6 0.3% 33.3 NV 6 1 16.7   ME 6 0.3% 33.3 NY 76 36 47.4   NV 6 0.3% 16.7 OH 63 31 49.2   MT 5 0.2% 60.0 OK 7 1 14.3   WV 5 0.2% 60.0 OR 32 17 53.1   IA 3 0.1% 0.0 PA 48 17 35.4   LA 3 0.1% 0.0 SC 2 1 50.0   ND 3 0.1% 0.0 TN 55 26 47.3   KS 2 0.1% 50.0 TX 60 25 41.7   KY 2 0.1% 50.0 UT 39 13 33.3   SC 2 0.1% 50.0 VA 57 35 61.4   WY 2 0.1% 0.0 VT 1 0.0 HI 1 0.0% 0.0 WA 48 23 47.9   MO 1 0.0% 0.0 WI 10 6 60.0   MS 1 0.0% 0.0 WV 5 3 60.0   NE 1 0.0% 0.0 WY 2   0.0 VT 1 0.0% 0.0 Total 2,146 1,005 46.8 2,146 SOURCE: Department of Energy. 131

TABLE APP-A-24  Phase II Applications—Success Rates by Demographics 132 Number of Declines Number of Awards Total Number of Applications Fiscal Year Woman Minority All Others All Woman Minority All Others All Woman Minority All others All 1995 17 21 154 192 8 10 63 81 25 31 217 273 1996 11 23 137 171 3 8 61 72 14 31 198 243 1997 12 21 117 150 6 8 71 85 18 29 188 235 1998 19 30 125 174 6 11 68 85 25 41 193 259 1999 12 27 140 179 5 12 71 88 17 39 211 267 2000 22 29 133 184 7 17 67 91 29 46 200 275 2001 12 26 140 178 8 10 80 98 20 36 220 276 2002 10 23 156 189 5 13 85 103 15 36 241 292 2003 12 22 173 207 6 6 90 102 18 28 263 309 Application Shares (%) Success Rates (%) Fiscal Year Woman Minority All others All Woman Minority All Others All 1995 8.9 10.9 80.2 100.0 47.1 47.6 40.9 42.2 1996 6.4 13.5 80.1 100.0 27.3 34.8 44.5 42.1 1997 8.0 14.0 78.0 100.0 50.0 38.1 60.7 56.7 1998 10.9 17.2 71.8 100.0 31.6 36.7 54.4 48.9 1999 6.7 15.1 78.2 100.0 41.7 44.4 50.7 49.2 2000 12.0 15.8 72.3 100.0 31.8 58.6 50.4 49.5 2001 6.7 14.6 78.7 100.0 66.7 38.5 57.1 55.1 2002 5.3 12.2 82.5 100.0 50.0 56.5 54.5 54.5 2003 5.8 10.6 83.6 100.0 50.0 27.3 52.0 49.3 SOURCE: Department of Energy.

TABLE APP-A-25  Phase II Applications, by Company Company Number of Applications Number of Awards Phase II Dollars Success Rate (%) Top 20 Companies (Plus Ties) Physical Optics Corporation, Electro-optics & Holo 38 21 14,399,812 55.3 Eltron Research, Inc. 36 18 12,099,295 50.0 TDA Research, Inc. 34 21 14,850,271 61.8 Omega-p, Inc. 33 18 12,650,000 54.5 Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc. 32 14 10,349,999 43.8 Physical Sciences, Inc. 32 12 7,966,660 37.5 Membrane Technology and Research, Inc. 26 14 9,923,405 53.8 Supercon, Inc. 24 8 4,599,731 33.3 MER Corporation 23 15 10,019,266 65.2 ADA Technologies, Inc. 23 9 6,299,009 39.1 Hypres, Inc. 22 10 6,599,415 45.5 Ceramem Corporation 21 13 9,200,000 61.9 Advanced Fuel Research, Inc. 20 8 5,136,686 40.0 Fm Technologies, Inc. 19 13 9,099,404 68.4 Spire Corporation 19 8 5,494,425 42.1 Science Research Laboratory, Inc. 18 12 7,949,428 66.7 Tech-x Corporation 18 11 7,843,709 61.1 American Superconductor Corporation 15 9 6,600,000 60.0 Calabazas Creek Research 15 12 7,395,865 80.0 Bend Research, Inc. 15 8 4,184,884 53.3 IGC Advanced Superconductors, Inc. 15 8 4,849,929 53.3 Other Top 20 awards winners (not 20 top applicants) Duly Research, Inc. 12 11 7,699,508 91.7 Diversified Technologies, Inc. 13 10 6,436,557 76.9 Haimson Research Corporation 9 9 6,079,745 100.0 Lynntech, Inc. 12 8 5,824,154 66.7 Fuelcell Energy, Inc. 11 8 5,249,873 72.7 133 SOURCE: Department of Energy.

Next: Appendix B: NRC Phase II Survey »
An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy Get This Book
×
Buy Hardback | $74.00 Buy Ebook | $59.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program is one of the largest examples of U.S. public-private partnerships. Founded in 1982, SBIR was designed to encourage small business to develop new processes and products and to provide quality research in support of the many missions of the U.S. government, including health, energy, the environment, and national defense. In response to a request from the U.S. Congress, the National Research Council assessed SBIR as administered by the five federal agencies that together make up 96 percent of program expenditures. This book, one of six in the series, reports on the SBIR program at the Department of Energy. It finds that, in spite of resource constraints, the DoE has made significant progress in meeting the legislative objectives of SBIR and that the program is effectively addressing the mission of the Department of Energy. The book documents the achievements and challenges of the program and recommends programmatic changes to make the SBIR program even more effective in achieving its legislative goals.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!