National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×

Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research

Panel on Benchmarking the Research Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering

Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology

Division on Earth and Life Studies

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

500 Fifth Street, N. W. Washington, DC 20001

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn fro m the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The memb ers of the panel responsible for the report were chosen for their special co mp etences an d with regard for appropriate balance.

This study was supported by the National Science Fo undation under Grant CTS-0534814.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or reco mmendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.

International Standard Book Number-13 : 978-0-309-11426-4

International Standard Book Number-10 : 0-309-11426-8

Additional copies of this report are available from:

The National Academies Press

500 Fifth Street, N.W. Box 285 Washington, DC 20055 (800) 624-6242 (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area) http://www.nap.edu

Copyright 2007 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine


The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.


The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering.


The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.


The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.


www.national-academies.org

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×

Panel on Benchmarking the Research Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering

WARD O. WINER, Chair,

Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

CRISTINA H. AMON,

University of Toronto, Canada

L. CATHERINE BRINSON,

Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois

EARL H. DOWELL,

Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

JOHN R. HOWELL,

University of Texas, Austin

MARSHALL G. JONES,

GE Corporate Research and Development, Niskayuna, New York

CHANG-JIN KIM,

University of California, Los Angeles

KEMPER E. LEWIS,

University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo

VAN C. MOW,

Columbia University, New York

J. TINSLEY ODEN,

University of Texas, Austin

MASAYOSHI TOMIZUKA,

University of California, Berkeley

National Research Council Staff

ALBERT EPSHTEYN, Christine Mirzayan Graduate Fellow (January-March 2007)

TINA MASCIANGIOLI, Program Officer

ERICKA MCGOWAN, Associate Program Officer

KELA MASTERS, Project Assistant

JESSICA PULLEN, Research Assistant

FEDERICO SAN MARTINI, Program Officer

MARTA VORNBROCK, Research Associate

DOROTHY ZOLANDZ, Director

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×

BOARD ON CHEMICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY

F. FLEMING CRIM (Co-Chair),

University of Wisconsin, Madison

GARY S. CALABRESE (Co-Chair),

Rohm & Haas, W. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

BENJAMIN ANDERSON,

Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana

PABLO G. DEBENEDETTI,

Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

RYAN R. DIRXX,

Arkema, Inc., Bristol, Pennsylvania

GEORGE W. FLYNN,

Columbia University, New York

MAURICIO FUTRAN,

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, New Brunswick, New Jersey

MARY GALVIN-DONOGHUE,

Air Products and Chemicals, Allentown, Pennsylvania

PAULA T. HAMMOND,

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

RIGOBERTO HERNANDEZ,

Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

JAY D. KEASLING,

University of California, Berkeley

JAMES L. KINSEY,

Rice University, Houston, Texas

MARTHA A. KREBS,

California Energy Commission, Sacramento

CHARLES T. KRESGE,

Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan

JOSEPH A. MILLER,

Corning, Inc., Corning, New York

SCOTT J. MILLER,

Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

GERALD V. POJE, Independent Consultant,

Vienna, Virginia

DONALD PROSNITZ,

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California

THOMAS H. UPTON,

ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Houston, Texas

National Research Council Staff

DOROTHY ZOLANDZ, Director

KATHRYN HUGHES, Postdoctoral Fellow

TINA M. MASCIANGIOLI, Program Officer

KELA MASTERS, Project Assistant

ERICKA M. MCGOWAN, Associate Program Officer

SYBIL A. PAIGE, Administrative Associate

JESSICA L. PULLEN, Research Assistant

FEDERICO SAN MARTINI, Program Officer

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF REVIEWERS

This report has been reviewed in draft form by persons chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that it meets institutional standards of objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:


Dr. Nadine Aubry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Dr. John M. Campbell, Sr., (Retired President and CEO, Campbell Companies), Norman, OK

Dr. Susan Cozzens, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

Dr. Iwona M Jasiuk, University of Illinois, Urbana

Dr. Nobuhide Kasagi, University of Tokyo, Japan

Dr. John H. Lienhard V, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

Dr. Lee A. Matsch, AlliedSignal Inc. (retired), Tempe, Arizona

Dr. C. Dan Mote, Jr., University of Maryland, College Park

Ms. Susan Skemp, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia

Dr. Venkataramani Sumantran, Sumantran Consulting, Chennai, India

Dr. A. Galip Ulsoy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Dr. Sean Wu, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan


Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they did not see the final draft of the report before its release. The review was overseen by Dr. Maxine Savitz, Retired General Manager of Technology and Partnerships, Honeywell Inc, and Dr. C. Bradley Moore, Northwestern University. Appointed by the National Research Council, they were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authors and the institution.

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×

Preface

At the request of the National Science Foundation Engineering Directorate, the National Academies performed an international benchmarking exercise to determine the standing of the U.S. research enterprise in the field of mechanical engineering relative to its international peers. This of course was no trivial undertaking, even for the panel of mechanical engineers assembled—11 members, mostly from U.S. universities, with expertise across the 11 selected areas of mechanical engineering covered in the report (see Chapter 1): acoustics and dynamics, bioengineering, computational mechanics, design and computer-aided design, dynamic systems and controls, energy systems, manufacturing and computer-aided manufacturing, mechanics of engineering materials, microelectromechanical systems and nanoelectromechanical systems, thermal systems and heat transfer, and tribology. The panel was charged with addressing three specific questions:

  1. What is the current position of U.S. mechanical engineering research relative to that of other regions or countries?

  2. What key factors influence U.S. performance in mechanical engineering?

  3. On the basis of current trends in the United States and abroad, what will be the relative U.S. position in the near term and in the longer term?

At the same time, the panel was instructed to perform its charge in a short time frame and with a limited budget. Thus, in order to adequately respond to its charge, the panel had to limit the scope of the exercise to assessing the state of mechanical engineering basic research as determined by the open research literature, the opinions of its peers, and easily accessible data on U.S. human resources and research funding. Based on this slice of information, this benchmarking exercise attempts to provide a “snapshot” of the current status of the discipline and to extrapolate the future status based on current trends. The report does not make judgments about the relative importance of leadership in each area nor make recommendations on actions to be taken to ensure such leadership in the future.


Ward O. Winer, Chair

Panel on International Benchmarking of Mechanical Engineering Research

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12055.
×
Page R12
Next: Summary »
Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical Engineering Basic Research Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $42.00 Buy Ebook | $33.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Mechanical engineering is critical to the design, manufacture, and operation of small and large mechanical systems throughout the U.S. economy. This book highlights the main findings of a benchmarking exercise to rate the standing of U.S. mechanical engineering basic research relative to other regions or countries. The book includes key factors that influence U.S. performance in mechanical engineering research, and near- and longer-term projections of research leadership.

U.S. leadership in mechanical engineering basic research overall will continue to be strong. Contributions of U.S. mechanical engineers to journal articles will increase, but so will the contributions from other growing economies such as China and India. At the same time, the supply of U.S. mechanical engineers is in jeopardy, because of declines in the number of U.S. citizens obtaining advanced degrees and uncertain prospects for continuing to attract foreign students. U.S. funding of mechanical engineering basic research and infrastructure will remain level, with strong leadership in emerging areas.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!