The purpose of this appendix is to expand on some of the brief descriptions of constituents that may be found in either recharge or discharge waters of managed underground storage (MUS) systems. These include basic physicochemical parameters, followed by inorganic and organic species, and finally microbes.
The first impressions of water quality are often based on visual observations. Water is expected to be free of particles (turbidity), color, and odor. Additional important physical characteristics of MUS waters include dissolved oxygen, pH, oxidation-reduction potential (Eh), specific conductance, and temperature.
Suspended particles impede the passage of light through water by scattering and absorbing the light rays. This interference of light passage is called turbidity. Waters with greater turbidity will experience increased clogging of filters and increased head loss development during infiltration. The particles contributing to turbidity can also harbor pathogens and enhance their survival in the presence of a disinfectant.
Color in a water is usually the result of an elevated organic content, such as humic and fulvic acids. The color of potable waters is typically determined by visually comparing a water sample to known color solutions prepared from a standard platinum-cobalt solution. Old water under anaerobic conditions may appear black or gray in color due to the presence of metallic sulfides.
The generation of gases during decomposition of organic matter or reduc-
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 297
Appendix A
Physical, Chemical, and Microbiological
Constituents of MUS Waters
The purpose of this appendix is to expand on some of the brief descriptions
of constituents that may be found in either recharge or discharge waters of man-
aged underground storage (MUS) systems. These include basic physicochemi-
cal parameters, followed by inorganic and organic species, and finally microbes.
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The first impressions of water quality are often based on visual observa-
tions. Water is expected to be free of particles (turbidity), color, and odor. Ad-
ditional important physical characteristics of MUS waters include dissolved
oxygen, pH, oxidation-reduction potential (Eh), specific conductance, and tem-
perature.
Turbidity
Suspended particles impede the passage of light through water by scattering
and absorbing the light rays. This interference of light passage is called turbid-
ity. Waters with greater turbidity will experience increased clogging of filters
and increased head loss development during infiltration. The particles contribut-
ing to turbidity can also harbor pathogens and enhance their survival in the pres-
ence of a disinfectant.
Color
Color in a water is usually the result of an elevated organic content, such as
humic and fulvic acids. The color of potable waters is typically determined by
visually comparing a water sample to known color solutions prepared from a
standard platinum-cobalt solution. Old water under anaerobic conditions may
appear black or gray in color due to the presence of metallic sulfides.
Odor
The generation of gases during decomposition of organic matter or reduc-
297
OCR for page 297
298 PROSPECTS FOR MANAGED UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF RECOVERABLE WATER
tion of dissolved sulfate often creates odorous compounds. Most odorous gases,
such as hydrogen sulfide and the sulfur-bearing mercaptans, are formed under
anaerobic conditions, so providing adequate dissolved oxygen is the first step
toward controlling odors. The control of odors is among the priority issues with
respect to public acceptance of a project.
Dissolved Oxygen
Adequate dissolved oxygen in surface waters is required for aerobic respira-
tion and is needed to protect fish and other aquatic life. The presence of dis-
solved oxygen (DO) leads to oxidizing conditions that minimize the formation
of noxious odors and prevents the solubilization of certain metals (e.g., iron,
manganese); however, introduction of DO into anaerobic or reduced aquifers
may oxidize sulfide minerals and increase the release of metals. The inverse
situation may occur as well; MUS activities that low DO water into a previously
oxidized part of the aquifer may lead to reductive dissolution of minerals and the
release of metals.
pH
The hydrogen ion concentration is an important quality parameter for all
waters. The usual means of expressing hydrogen ion concentration is pH, which
is defined as the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration. pH influ-
ences the surface charge on solid surfaces, the distribution of acidic and basic
compounds, the form of a chemical in solution, the solubility of compounds, the
physical shape of organic molecules, and the toxicity of the medium.
Oxidation-Reduction p\Potential (ORP)
Eh is another critical parameter because of the effect of high Eh waters on
iron-bearing minerals. Such solutions, which often contain high levels of dis-
solved oxygen, alter primary minerals to iron oxyhydroxides, thus changing the
water chemistry as well as altering the aquifer properties. Eh and pH are also
primary controls on the population of subsurface bacteria that biodegrade certain
organic contaminants, as well as on those that cause illness. Some sulfate-
reducing bacteria, for example, survive or thrive only in the absence of dissolved
oxygen.
OCR for page 297
APPENDIX A 299
Specific Conductance
Specific conductance is a measure of how well a given water sample con-
ducts an electrical current. It is defined as the "reciprocal of the resistance in
ohms measured between opposite faces of a centimeter cube of an aqueous solu-
tion at a specified temperature” (Hem, 1985). It is a straightforward measure-
ment that can be made with reasonable accuracy in the field. It is, therefore,
often used as a proxy in lieu of the total dissolved solids (TDS) in a solution.
The relationship between conductivity and TDS depends on the actual dissolved
anions and cations (i.e., sodium chloride and calcium sulfate solutions of the
same strength would have different specific conductances), so it is only a gen-
eral indicator. However, if the dissolved salts are known to be of seawater ori-
gin, the correlation may be quite good. Specific conductance also depends on
temperature.
Temperature
Water temperature can be important for several reasons. In the case of re-
charge water, it can affect the speed (“kinetics) of reactions in the subsurface. In
general, higher temperatures increase the rate of most chemical reactions. Reac-
tions involving dissolved gases (e.g., limestone dissolution, which involves dis-
solved carbon dioxide) are also affected by temperature. Bacteria involved in
clogging and oxidation-reduction reactions (including those related to aesthetic
concerns) are more or less active depending on temperature. In the case of dis-
charge water, higher temperatures generally have lower dissolved oxygen, and
this might impact use of the water for environmental purposes.
INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
Inorganic chemical constituents of concern in MUS source waters are sum-
marized in Table 4-2. Inorganic chemicals of concern can be grouped as nutri-
ents, nonmetals, and metals. Nitrogen and phosphorous species are known as
nutrients because they are essential for growth of microorganisms and plants.
The nonmetals of concern are hydrogen ions and dissolved salts, such as chlo-
ride, sulfate, and boron. The metals of concern are often present at trace con-
centrations, and many are classified as priority pollutants. Examples of toxic
metals include arsenic, cadmium, mercury, lead, and chromium. Iron and man-
ganese are metals that influence the aesthetic quality of the water. The presence
of inorganic constituents in excessive quantities will interfere with many benefi-
cial uses of the water due to aesthetic issues or because of their toxicity.
OCR for page 297
300 PROSPECTS FOR MANAGED UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF RECOVERABLE WATER
Nutrients
Nitrogen and phosphorus are essential nutrients for growth of biomass.
Their presence in water can stimulate growth of algae and microorganisms.
This creates nuisance conditions during storage of the water and can accelerate
biomass clogging in the subsurface. Nitrogen exists in several oxidation states
with ammonia, nitrogen gas, nitrite, and nitrate being the common forms in wa-
ter supplies. Chemical and biological reactions can convert one nitrogen form to
another. Unionized ammonia (NH3) is toxic to fish and other aquatic life. At
the pH of most natural waters, ammonia is mostly in the cationic form (NH4+).
As water containing NH4+ contacts soil, NH4+ is usually rapidly removed from
solution by ion exchange processes. Nitrite is relatively unstable and is easily
oxidized to nitrate. Nitrite is also toxic to fish, other aquatic life, and humans.
Nitrate is the most oxidized form of nitrogen. Nitrate readily moves with water
through the subsurface and can impact the quality of water on a large scale.
Nitrate is limited to 10 mg/L as nitrogen in drinking water because of its serious
toxicity to infants. The usual aqueous forms of phosphorus are orthophosphate,
polyphosphate, and organic phosphate. Phosphorus does not undergo change in
oxidation state. Phosphates tend to precipitate and be removed by ion exchange
in the subsurface.
Salts
Water in contact with the earth will naturally accumulate dissolved salts,
such as sodium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, chloride, sulfate, and bicar-
bonate. A gravimetric measurement technique that quantifies the residue of
filtered water upon evaporation is termed total dissolved solids and provides an
indicator of the total salt content. The TDS concentration is an important indica-
tor of the usefulness of water for various applications. For example, drinking
water has a recommended maximum TDS of 500 mg/L. Excessive dissolved
salts influence the ability to recycle water in an MUS system as they impart a
salty taste (aesthetic concern), accelerate corrosion of metals, form deposits, and
can have a laxative effect in the case of sulfate.
Metals, Metalloids, and Other Constituents
Trace quantities of many metals (including metalloids), such as arsenic,
cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, and zinc
are present in many waters. Organisms require most metals in trace quantities;
therefore, the absence of trace metals in water is limiting to biomass growth.
Many metals are classified as priority pollutants, so excessive amounts of these
metals will interfere with beneficial uses of the water. Elevated iron and man-
ganese in water imparts a metallic taste and causes staining of water fixtures.
OCR for page 297
APPENDIX A 301
The most prevalent toxicity from use of recycled water for irrigation is from
boron. The source of boron is usually household detergents or discharges from
industrial plants. A guideline limit of <0.7 mg/L of boron allows for unre-
stricted use of the water for irrigation of food crops. Boron levels above 3 mg/L
are severely toxic to plants.
While many of the metals listed above can be toxic (see Table A-1), the
metal of most widespread concern in MUS systems is arsenic. This is not only
because the maximum contaminant level is low, but also because it is associated
with commonly occurring iron oxyhydroxides and sulfides in the subsurface.
These minerals often release arsenic in response to changes in oxidation-
reduction state. Arsenic is treated in considerable detail in Chapter 4.
Radionuclides
Radionuclides are unstable atoms that change their atomic state through the
process of radioactive decay (U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Wel-
fare, 1970). Radioactive decay results in the release of alpha, beta, or gamma
radiation. The emission of alpha and beta particles transforms an isotope into a
different element, while the emission of gamma radiation reduces the energy
level of the element. When alpha, beta, or gamma radiation passes through ad-
jacent atoms, it can dislodge electrons from their orbit and create ionized spe-
cies. This ionization and deposition of energy can damage materials and lead to
deleterious effects in human tissues including mutagenic, teratogenic, and acute
toxicity. Consequently, human exposures to radionuclides are stringently con-
trolled.
Radionuclides in water supplies can be from natural or anthropogenic
sources (Viessman and Hammer, 2005). Naturally occurring radioactive ele-
ments of importance in water often emit alpha particles. These elements, such
as radium-226, can leach from geological formations and enter groundwater.
Radioactivity from radium is also widespread in surface waters because of fall-
out from testing of nuclear weapons. Another source of radioactivity in water
supplies is small releases from nuclear power plants and industrial users of ra-
dioactive materials (e.g., weapons manufacture and testing; medical applica-
tions; nuclear fuel processing, use, and disposal). Radionuclides are currently
regulated in drinking water by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). The limit for gross alpha particle activity is 15 pCi/L, and the limit for
the sum of 226Rd and 228Rd is 5 pCi/L. The measurement unit of pCi/L is 10-12
curie per liter, with a curie being the radioactivity of 1 gram of radium. The
activity from beta radiation is primarily from nuclear weapons testing, and the
allowable amount is up to 4 mrem/yr, which is a measure of equivalent absorbed
dose. Uranium has several radioactive isotopes, and the uranium concentration
must be less than 30 µg/L.
A study by the National Academy of Sciences (1977) concluded that natural
background radiation can be estimated to cause 4.5 to 45 fatal cases of cancer
OCR for page 297
302 PROSPECTS FOR MANAGED UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF RECOVERABLE WATER
per year per million people, and less than 1 percent of the risk is attributed to
radionuclides in drinking water. Consequently, in most water supplies, it is not
possible to measure any adverse health effects from radionuclides with certainty.
Monitoring for radionuclides in water supplies is straightforward, and it is pru-
dent to periodically monitor the radionuclide activity in the source and extracted
waters in MUS systems to ensure the safety of the consumer.
ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
Residual organic carbon is a concern in underground storage systems be-
cause some of these compounds are associated with a broad spectrum of poten-
tial health concerns (Asano, 1998). Three groups of residual organic chemicals
require attention: (1) natural organic matter (NOM) present in most water sup-
plies, (2) soluble microbial products (SMPs) formed during the wastewater
treatment process and resulting from the decomposition of organic compounds
(Barker and Stuckey, 1999), and (3) synthetic organic compounds (SOC) added
by consumers and generated as disinfection by-products (DBPs) during the dis-
infection of water and wastewater.
Natural Organic Matter and Soluble Microbial Products
Natural organic matter and soluble microbial products are mixtures of com-
pounds that cannot be effectively measured individually. When NOM and
SMPs are measured as a group as dissolved organic carbon, the concentrations
of organic carbon are typically measured in the milligram-per-liter range. Most
waters contain NOM and reclaimed waters contain a mixture of NOM and
SMPs. These compounds are not known to present significant health concerns.
The primary concern above NOM and SMPs is their potential to form disinfec-
tion by-products and to stimulate biological growth in distribution systems, in
wells, or in situ. Synthetic organic compounds and disinfection by-products are
measured individually at concentrations of microgram or nanogram per liter.
When a pool of organic carbon exists, the synthetic organic carbon compounds
and disinfection by-products may represent less than 1 percent of the total or-
ganic carbon. However, concerns about both human and aquatic health effects
are generally associated with SOCs and DBPs.
Most waters used in underground storage systems receive limited charac-
terization of NOM and/or SMPs that comprise the bulk of the organic carbon
compounds present. Typically, these compounds are quantified by dissolved
organic carbon measurements and ultraviolet absorbance (UVA) (Ma and Yin,
2001). UVA provides a relative measure of the aromatic content of the dis-
solved organic carbon and serves as a predictor of disinfection by-product for-
mation potential. DBP formation potential tests are also used to characterize the
reactivity of NOM and SMPs with disinfectants. Advanced characterization of
OCR for page 297
APPENDIX A 303
NOM and SMPs has been done for research purposes. Separation techniques
used for bulk organic carbon include molecular weight fractionation, size exclu-
sion chromatography and fractionation based on hydrophobicity (Croue et al.,
2000). Spectroscopic characterization of organic carbon isolates may be done
using 13C nuclear magnetic spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectros-
copy, and fluorescence spectroscopy (Fox et al., 2001). In addition, elemental
analysis may be done to determine the elemental composition of organic com-
pound mixtures. The majority of these techniques do not identify significant
differences in organic compound structure, function, and reactivity when com-
paring NOM samples with mixtures of NOM and SMPs in reclaimed waters.
SMPs do have elevated levels of organic nitrogen and associated fluorescence
compared to NOMs.
Organic compounds are removed during subsurface storage by a combina-
tion of filtration, sorption, oxidation-reduction and biodegradation. Biodegrada-
tion is the primary sustainable removal mechanism for organic compounds dur-
ing subsurface transport. The concentrations of NOM and SMPs are reduced
during subsurface transport as high-molecular-weight compounds are hydro-
lyzed into lower-molecular-weight compounds and the lower-molecular-weight
compounds serve as substrate for microorganisms. As the concentrations of
NOM and SMPs are decreased, the disinfection by-product potential associated
with these compounds is also decreased (AwwaRF, 2001). Synthetic organic
compounds at concentrations too low to directly support microbial growth may
be co-metabolized as NOM and SMPs serve as the primary substrate for growth.
Given sufficient surface area and contact time, the water used for underground
storage may approach the quality of native groundwaters with respect to organic
carbon content.
Total Organic Carbon
The performance of sustainable underground storage systems with respect
to organic carbon transformations has often been quantified by measuring total
organic carbon (TOC). While total organic carbon does not provide any sig-
nificant information regarding health effects, it has often been used as a surro-
gate for organic carbon removal for several reasons. TOC is simple to measure,
and most laboratories can measure it rapidly and accurately. The second reason
is that 1 mg of organic carbon may be composed of millions of different com-
pounds and these compounds cannot be individually quantified. Furthermore, if
all these compounds could be quantified, using the data collected would be very
difficult to interpret. A health effects study completed in Los Angeles County
determined there were no impacts of groundwater recharge from reclaimed wa-
ter. The California Department of Health Services estimated that the maximum
TOC concentration from reclaimed water in the drinking water supply was 1
mg/L. Presently, California has a guideline of 0.5 mg/L of TOC from recycled
water that may be used for drinking water. The State of Washington has a pro-
OCR for page 297
304 PROSPECTS FOR MANAGED UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF RECOVERABLE WATER
posed rule of 1 mg/L of TOC for direct injection with reclaimed water and Flor-
ida has limit of 3 mg/L of TOC for groundwater recharge with reclaimed water.
When TOC concentrations for reclaimed water are set at 1 mg/L or less, the
target that concentration is below the TOC concentration of most surface water
sources. The result is there must be significant dilution of the reclaimed water
used for recharge, or extensive treatment of the reclaimed water is required.
Since most reclaimed waters contain refractory NOM and SMPs in excess of 2
mg TOC/L, treatment by nanofiltration or reverse osmosis is necessary to reduce
the TOC concentration to below 1 mg/L.
Efforts to develop surrogates for organic carbon removal other than TOC
are currently ongoing and were summarized at the Water Reuse Foundation Re-
search Conference in May 2006. The fact that TOC concentrations below 1
mg/L can still contain elevated concentrations of synthetic organic compounds
with significant health concerns such as N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA).
Since refractory TOC concentrations depend on the original drinking water
source and SMP production during wastewater treatment, a measure of micro-
bial activity was suggested as a surrogate during subsurface transport where the
major sustainable removal mechanism is biodegradation. The mosquito repel-
lent DEET (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide, a personal care product, was suggested
as a marker since it is biodegradable and almost all other biodegradable com-
pounds were removed before DEET.
Synthetic Organic Carbon
Many waters used in underground storage systems are analyzed for con-
taminants regulated by the Safe Drinking Water Act, which includes maximum
contaminant levels (MCLs) for 51 synthetic organic compounds. Since many of
the compounds were regulated by the Safe Drinking Water Act because of
groundwater contamination issues, these compounds are not often detected in
water sources being considered for underground storage. Exceptions to the case
include chlorinated disinfection by-products and specific agricultural chemicals.
When reclaimed waters are used as a water source, monitoring for emerging
contaminants of concern may be applied in specific states such as California.
Trace Organics
Trace organics in both wastewater and surface waters impacted by human
and animal waste streams are of interest if used for MUS systems. The behavior
of selected trace organics during underground storage has been studied to iden-
tify and quantify processes that affect organic contaminant attenuation during
subsurface transport. The majority of this research has focused on the use of
reclaimed water as a source water and also the use of sewage-contaminated sur-
face waters in bank filtrations systems. For trace organic compounds, the prin-
OCR for page 297
APPENDIX A 305
cipal attenuating processes are biological transformation and sorption. The oc-
currence of these processes differs depending on compound structure, soil, and
biogeochemical conditions. The capacity of biodegradation and sorption to at-
tenuate organic contaminants may vary considerably depending upon the under-
ground storage system. Geochemical factors such as changes in redox condi-
tions and the formation of organic complexes may also affect transformations
during subsurface transport. Attempts to develop time-distance relationship for
the attenuation processes have been successful for specific types of systems such
as flow through porous media in sand and gravel aquifers. Initial research ac-
tivities focused on the fate of compounds present at microgram-per-liter concen-
trations in source waters. These compounds included clofibric acid, surfactants
such as alkylphenolethoxylates, disinfection by-products, nitrilotriacetic acid,
and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). As analytical techniques im-
proved to detect compounds at nanogram per liter concentrations, concerns
about pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and endocrine dis-
rupting compounds (EDC) led to additional research on these emerging con-
taminants of concern. As a result of this research, certain anthropogenic com-
pounds have been determined to be persistent in most underground storage sys-
tems; however, the health effects associated with these compounds at nanogram-
per-liter concentrations have not been assessed. Emerging disinfection by-
products such as N-nitrosodimethylamine have also been studied during subsur-
face transport.
The occurrence and significance of anthropogenic compounds in surface
waters impacted by wastewater discharges in the United States was described in
a survey by Kolpin et al. (2002), who conducted a survey of 139 streams in the
United States for 93 organic waste contaminants, and a wide range of pharma-
ceuticals and personal care products were measured creating concerns over the
safety of surface waters as drinking water supply. The widespread occurrence
of these compounds in the United States and Europe was discussed by Daughton
and Ternes (1999), who suggested that impacts to aquatic life and other envi-
ronmental impacts were possible; however, the concentrations of pharmaceuti-
cals were too low to have a defined impact on human health. Nevertheless, con-
cern over these emerging contaminants has resulted in active research on the fate
and transport of these compounds in the environment. Research on the fate of
these compounds during bank filtration has been occurring to a large extent in
Europe and to a lesser extent in the United States (Heberer et al., 2001). Sev-
eral monitoring studies carried out in Berlin, Germany, between 1996 and 2000
identified pharmaceuticals such as clofibric acid, diclofenac, ibuprofen, propy-
phenazone, primidone and carbamazepine at individual concentrations up to the
nanogram-per-liter level in influent and effluent samples from WWTPs and in
all surface water samples collected downstream from the waste water treatment
plants (Heberer, 2002). The persistence of carbamazepine has led researchers to
suggest that carbamazepine be used as a universal indicator of anthropogenic
contamination.
OCR for page 297
306 PROSPECTS FOR MANAGED UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF RECOVERABLE WATER
MICROORGANISMS
The microorganisms of concern associated with public health risks in
groundwaters and source waters used for MUS may be divided into two major
categories; those that are associated with fecal pollution of ground- and surface
water and those that may be naturally-occurring. Groundwater has been shown
to be a major source associated with waterborne disease outbreaks in the United
States, because it is often used without treatment. In addition as already men-
tioned, the nature (perceived as protected) of groundwater and its use (as a pota-
ble supply) dictates the absence of “indicator” organisms and pathogens associ-
ated with contamination and public health risk as well as absence of pathogens.
All surface waters will have some level of algae, bacteria, and parasites; if
there are sewage inputs there will also be enteric viruses and other microbes of
fecal origin. Thus unless this water is pretreated to drinking water standards or
infiltration systems are used to effectively remove some percentage of the mi-
croorganisms, then the source or stored water will contain these microbes. The
native groundwater could also contain some bacteria and protozoa that may or
may not pose a risk to human health. The targeted microbial contamination
level associated with acceptable risks would depend on the use of the recovered
water. For potable purposes a maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG) of
zero is the target for those microorganisms associated with disease. Finally, both
regrowth and attenuation (usually due to die-off) of bacteria and the free-living
protozoa can occur depending on the conditions. For enteric viruses and proto-
zoa long-term survival is of concern and interest. As a part of the attenuation via
filtration or dilution (diffusion) the concentrations of the microorganisms which
may migrate and be transported into other aquifers has also been an area of re-
search.
Monitoring for the wide range of microorganisms in source, stored and re-
covered water has not been widely implemented. Thus there is often a presump-
tion of microbial water quality based on the monitoring of selected “indicator”
species. As mentioned the primary research has focused on drinking water MUS
systems and thus those microbes associated with fecal pollution and standards
and rules for potable water have been the target of most of the controversy and
studies. The bacterial pathogens are rarely monitored for, a select group of vi-
ruses may be monitored for on occasion, and the protozoa are monitored for in
surface waters but not generally groundwaters. None of these groups of mi-
crobes are monitored for in reclaimed waters on a routine basis (the exception
being Florida which requires monitoring of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in
reclaimed wastewaters).
Table A-1 gives the list of some of the routine and emerging microorgan-
isms that may be of concern in MUS systems. These all have an MCLG of zero
in drinking water.
OCR for page 297
APPENDIX A 307
TABLE A-1 Pathogens and Microorganisms of Possible Concern with MUS Systems
Relationship
Occurrence Other Key
to Ground-
Microbe Sources water in Water Points
Bacteria
Toxins found Not routinely
Cyanobacteria Naturally- Unknown
in surface monitored for yet
occurring could be sta-
waters alone in MUS.
In Surface Wa- ble in MUS
with seasonal On the CCL
ters aquifers
blooms
Aerotolerant Can cause
Animal/ bird Associated
Campylobacter
Guillian Barré
and human with Stable in non-
Syndrome
fecal wastes groundwater disinfected
outbreaks waters
Possibly Unknown Grows at low Emerging human
Arcobacter
animal and Identified in temperatures pathogen
human wastes groundwater
with massive
contamina-
tion
Emerging cause
Human sewage Association Detected by
Helicobacter
of ulcers and
with human PCR in sew-
disease and age and cancer;
on the CCL
exposure to groundwater
groundwater
Grows along No studies on
Naturally- Found in
Legionella
with increased enhancement of
occurring in groundwater
amoeba and populations un-
aquatic envi- and cause of
heterotrophs der MUS
ronment the distribu-
tion system in biofilms
seeding
a
Viruses .
Adenoviruses Human Detected in High concentra-
Wastewater ground-, sur- tions in sewage,
face, and long-term survival
drinking water in water;
more resistant to
UV
Coxsackie Human CB5 found to Cause of chronic
wastewater be one of the diseases.
most preva-
lent viruses in
sewage and
polluted wa-
ters.
table continues
OCR for page 297
322 PROSPECTS FOR MANAGED UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF RECOVERABLE WATER
problems factories
p-Dichlorobenzene 0.075 0.075 Anemia; liver, Discharge from
kidney or industrial
spleen chemical
damage; factories
changes in
blood
1,2-Dichloroethane zero 0.005 Increased risk Discharge from
of cancer industrial
chemical
factories
1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.007 0.007 Liver problems Discharge from
industrial
chemical
factories
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.07 0.07 Liver problems Discharge from
industrial
chemical
factories
trans-1,2- 0.1 0.1 Liver problems Discharge from
Dichloroethylene industrial
chemical
factories
Dichloromethane zero 0.005 Liver prob- Discharge from
lems; in- drug and
creased risk of chemical
cancer factories
1,2-Dichloropropane zero 0.005 Increased risk Discharge from
of cancer industrial
chemical
factories
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate 0.4 0.4 Weight loss, Discharge from
liver problems, chemical
or possible factories
reproductive
difficulties.
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate zero 0.006 Reproductive Discharge from
difficulties; rubber and
liver problems; chemical
increased risk factories
of cancer
OCR for page 297
APPENDIX A 323
Dinoseb 0.007 0.007 Reproductive Runoff from
difficulties herbicide used
on soybeans
and vegetables
Dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) zero 0.0000000 Reproductive Emissions from
3 difficulties; waste incinera-
increased risk tion and other
of cancer combustion;
discharge from
chemical
factories
Diquat 0.02 0.02 Cataracts Runoff from
herbicide use
Endothall 0.1 0.1 Stomach and Runoff from
intestinal prob- herbicide use
lems
Endrin 0.002 0.002 Liver problems Residue of
banned insec-
ticide
9
Epichlorohydrin zero TT Increased Discharge from
cancer risk, industrial
and over a chemical
long period of factories; an
time, stomach impurity of
problems some water
treatment
chemicals
Ethylbenzene 0.7 0.7 Liver or kid- Discharge from
neys problems petroleum
refineries
Ethylene dibromide zero 0.00005 Problems with Discharge from
liver, stomach, petroleum
reproductive refineries
system, or
kidneys;
increased risk
of cancer
Glyphosate 0.7 0.7 Kidney prob- Runoff from
lems; repro- herbicide use
ductive
difficulties
Heptachlor zero 0.0004 Liver damage; Residue of
OCR for page 297
324 PROSPECTS FOR MANAGED UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF RECOVERABLE WATER
increased risk banned
of cancer termiticide
Heptachlor epoxide zero 0.0002 Liver damage; Breakdown of
increased risk heptachlor
of cancer
Hexachlorobenzene zero 0.001 Liver or kidney Discharge from
problems; metal refineries
reproductive and agricultural
difficulties; chemical
increased risk factories
of cancer
Hexachlorocyclo- 0.05 0.05 Kidney or Discharge from
pentadiene stomach prob- chemical
lems factories
Lindane 0.0002 0.0002 Liver or kidney Run-
problems off/leaching
from insecti-
cide used on
cattle, lumber,
gardens
Methoxychlor 0.04 0.04 Reproductive Run-
difficulties off/leaching
from insecti-
cide used on
fruits,
vegetables,
alfalfa,
livestock
Oxamyl (Vydate) 0.2 0.2 Slight nervous Runoff/leach-
system effects ing from
insecticide
used on
apples,
potatoes, and
tomatoes
Runoff from
Polychlorinated zero 0.0005 Skin changes;
landfills;
biphenyls (PCBs) thymus gland
discharge of
problems;
waste
immune
chemicals
deficiencies;
reproductive
or nervous
system
difficulties;
increased risk
OCR for page 297
APPENDIX A 325
of cancer
Pentachlorophenol zero 0.001 Liver or kidney Discharge from
problems; wood preserv-
increased ing factories
cancer risk
Picloram 0.5 0.5 Liver problems Herbicide
runoff
Simazine 0.004 0.004 Problems with Herbicide
blood runoff
Styrene 0.1 0.1 Liver, kidney, Discharge from
or circulatory rubber and
system plastic
problems factories;
leaching from
landfills
Tetrachloroethylene zero 0.005 Liver Discharge from
problems; factories and
increased risk dry cleaners
of cancer
Toluene 1 1 Nervous Discharge from
system, petroleum
kidney, or liver factories
problems
Toxaphene zero 0.003 Kidney, liver, Runoff/leach-
or thyroid ing from insec-
problems; ticide used on
increased risk cotton and
of cancer cattle
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 0.05 0.05 Liver problems Residue of
banned
herbicide
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.07 0.07 Changes in Discharge from
adrenal glands textile finishing
factories
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 0.2 Liver, nervous Discharge from
system, or metal
circulatory degreasing
problems sites and other
factories
OCR for page 297
326 PROSPECTS FOR MANAGED UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF RECOVERABLE WATER
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.003 0.005 Liver, kidney, Discharge from
or immune industrial
system chemical
problems factories
Trichloroethylene zero 0.005 Liver prob- Discharge from
lems; metal degreas-
increased risk ing sites and
of cancer other factories
Vinyl chloride zero 0.002 Increased risk Leaching from
of cancer PVC pipes;
discharge from
plastic
factories
Xylenes (total) 10 10 Nervous Discharge from
system petroleum
damage factories;
discharge from
chemical
factories
Radionuclides
MCL or Sources of
1
MCLG Potential Health Effects
1
Contaminant TT Contaminant in
2
(mg/L) from Ingestion of Water
2
(mg/L) Drinking Water
7
Alpha particles None 15 pico- Increased risk of cancer Erosion of natural
---------- curies deposits of certain
zero per Liter minerals that are
(pCi/L) radioactive and may
emit a form of radiation
known as alpha radia-
tion
7
Beta particles None 4 mil- Increased risk of cancer Decay of natural and
and photon ---------- lirems man-made deposits of
emitters zero per year
certain minerals that
are radioactive and
may emit forms of
radiation known as
photons and beta
radiation
7
Radium 226 and None 5 pCi/L Increased risk of cancer Erosion of natural
Radium 228 ---------- deposits
(combined) zero
OCR for page 297
APPENDIX A 327
Uranium Zero 30 ug/L Increased risk of cancer, Erosion of natural
as of kidney toxicity deposits
12/08/0
3
Notes:
1
Definitions:
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) - The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking
water. MCLs are set as close to MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology and
taking cost into consideration. MCLs are enforceable standards.
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) - The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which
there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety and are non-
enforceable public health goals.
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL) - The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking
water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial
contaminants.
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG) - The level of a drinking water disinfectant below
which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of
disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.
Treatment Technique - A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking
water.
2
Units are in milligrams per liter (mg/L) unless otherwise noted. Milligrams per liter are equivalent to
parts per million.
3
EPA's surface water treatment rules require systems using surface water or groundwater under the
direct influence of surface water to (1) disinfect their water, and (2) filter their water or meet criteria for
avoiding filtration so that the following contaminants are controlled at the following levels:
• Cryptosporidium: (as of1/1/02 for systems serving >10,000 and 1/14/05 for systems serving
<10,000) 99% removal.
• Giardia lamblia: 99.9% removal/inactivation
• Viruses: 99.99% removal/inactivation
• Legionella: No limit, but EPA believes that if Giardia and viruses are removed/inactivated,
Legionella will also be controlled.
• Turbidity: At no time can turbidity (cloudiness of water) go above 5 nephelolometric turbidity
units (NTU); systems that filter must ensure that the turbidity go no higher than 1 NTU (0.5
NTU for conventional or direct filtration) in at least 95% of the daily samples in any month. As
of January 1, 2002, turbidity may never exceed 1 NTU, and must not exceed 0.3 NTU in 95%
of daily samples in any month.
• HPC: No more than 500 bacterial colonies per milliliter.
• Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment (Effective Date: January 14, 2005);
Surface water systems or (GWUDI) systems serving fewer than 10,000 people must comply
with the applicable Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule provisions (e.g.
turbidity standards, individual filter monitoring, Cryptosporidium removal requirements,
updated watershed control requirements for unfiltered systems).
• Filter Backwash Recycling; The Filter Backwash Recycling Rule requires systems that
recycle to return specific recycle flows through all processes of the system's existing
conventional or direct filtration system or at an alternate location approved by the state.
4
more than 5.0% samples total coliform-positive in a month. (For water systems that collect fewer than
40 routine samples per month, no more than one sample can be total coliform-positive per month.)
Every sample that has total coliform must be analyzed for either fecal coliforms or E. coli if two
consecutive TC-positive samples, and one is also positive for E.coli fecal coliforms, system has an acute
MCL violation.
5
Fecal coliform and E. coli are bacteria whose presence indicates that the water may be contaminated
with human or animal wastes. Disease-causing microbes (pathogens) in these wastes can cause
diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches, or other symptoms. These pathogens may pose a special health
risk for infants, young children, and people with severely compromised immune systems.
6
Although there is no collective MCLG for this contaminant group, there are individual MCLGs for some
of the individual contaminants:
• Trihalomethanes: bromodichloromethane (zero); bromoform (zero); dibromochloromethane
(0.06 mg/L). Chloroform is regulated with this group but has no MCLG.
• Haloacetic acids: dichloroacetic acid (zero); trichloroacetic acid (0.3 mg/L). Monochloroacetic
acid, bromoacetic acid, and dibromoacetic acid are regulated with this group but have no
MCLGs.
OCR for page 297
328 PROSPECTS FOR MANAGED UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF RECOVERABLE WATER
7
MCLGs were not established before the 1986 Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act. Therefore,
there is no MCLG for this contaminant.
8
Lead and copper are regulated by a Treatment Technique that requires systems to control the
corrosiveness of their water. If more than 10% of tap water samples exceed the action level, water
systems must take additional steps. For copper, the action level is 1.3 mg/L, and for lead is 0.015 mg/L.
9
Each water system must certify, in writing, to the state (using third-party or manufacturer's certification)
that when acrylamide and epichlorohydrin are used in drinking water systems, the combination (or
product) of dose and monomer level does not exceed the levels specified, as follows:
• Acrylamide = 0.05% dosed at 1 mg/L (or equivalent)
• Epichlorohydrin = 0.01% dosed at 20 mg/L (or equivalent)
SOURCE: Reproduced from EPA Drinking Water Contaminants. Available on the web at
http://www.epa.gov/safewater/contaminants/index.html. Last accessed July 5, 2007.
REFERENCES
Abbaszadegan, M., M. LeChevallier, and C. Gerba. 2003. Occurrence of viruses
in US ground waters. J. Am Water Works Assoc. 95:107-120.
Aruin, L.I. (1997) Helicobacter pylori infection is carcinogenic for humans.
Arkhiv Patologii 59, 74–78.
Atlas, R. M. 1999. Legionella: from environmental habitats to disease pathol-
ogy, detection and control. Environ Microbiol 1:283-293.
Awwa Research Foundation (AwwaRF). 2001. Soil Aquifer Treatment for Sus-
tainable Water Reuse. Denver, CO: AwwaRF.
Barker, D. J., and D. C. Stuckey. 1999. A Review of Soluble Microbial Prod-
ucts (SMP) in Wastewater Treatment Systems. Water Science & Technol-
ogy 33(14):3063- 3082.
Benin, A. L., R. F. Benson, and R. E. Besser. 2002. Trends in Legionnaires
Disease, 1980–1998: Declining Mortality and New Patterns of Diagnosis.
Clinical Infectious Diseases 35:1039-1046.
Blaser, M.J. (1990) Helicobacter pylori and the pathogenesis of gastro ⁄ -
duodenal inflammation. J Infect Dis 161, 626–633.
Borchardt, M. A., P. D. Bertz, S. K. Spencer, and D. A. Battigelli. 1990.
Incidence of Enteric Viruses in Groundwater from Household Wells in
Wisconsin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 69(2): 1172–1180.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2006. Summary of Notifi-
able Diseases—United States, 2004. Atlanta: CDC.
Clark, C. G., L. Price, R. Ahmed, D. L. Woodward, P. L. Melito, F. G. Rodgers,
F. Jamieson, B. Ciebin, A. Li, and A. Ellis. 2003. Characterization of Wa-
terborne Outbreak–associated Campylobacter jejuni, Walkerton, Ontario.
Emerging Infectious Diseases 9(10): 1232-1241.
Croue, J., G. V. Korshin, and M. Benjamin. 2000. Characterization of Natural
Organic Matter in Drinking Water. Denver, CO: AWWA Research Foun-
dation and American Water Works Association.
Daughton, C., and T. Ternes. 1999. Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Prod-
ucts in the Environment: Agents of Subtle Change? Environmental Health
Perspectives, 107(6):907-937.
OCR for page 297
APPENDIX A 329
Diergaardt, S. M., S. N. Venter, A. Spreeth, J. Theron, and V. S. Brozel. 2004.
The occurrence of campylobacters in water sources in South Africa. Water
Res. 38:2589.
Ellis, W. A., S. D.Neill, J. J. O'Brien, H. W. Ferguson, and J. Hanna. 1977.
Isolation of spirillum/vibrio-like organisms from bovine fetuses. Veterinary
Record 100:451–452.
Feldman, R. A., A. J. P. Eccersley, and J. M. Hardie. 1997. Transmission of
Helicobacter pylori. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 13:8–12.
Fields, B. S., R. F. Benson, and R. E. Besser. 2002. Legionella and
Legionnaires' Disease: 25 Years of Investigation. Clinical Microbiology
Reviews 15:506-526.
Fiore, A. E., J. P. Nuorti, O. S. Levine, A. Marx, A. C. Weltman, S. Yeager, R.
F. Benson, J. Pruckler, P. H. Edelstein, P. Greer, S. R. Zaki, B. S. Fields,
and J. C. Butler. 1998. Epidemic Legionnaires' Disease Two Decades Later:
Old Sources, New Diagnostic Methods. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 26(2):
426-433.
Fisman, D. N., S. Lim, G A. Wellenius, C. Johnson, P. Britz, M. Gaskins, J..
Maher, M. A. Mittleman, C. V. Spain, and C. N. Haas. 2005. It's Not the
Heat, It's the Humidity: Wet Weather Increases Legionellosis Risk in the
Greater Philadelphia Metropolitan Area. Journal of Infectious Diseases
192:2066-2073.
Fong, T.-T., L. S. Mansfield, D. L. Wilson, D. J. Schwab, S. L. Molloy, and J.
B. Rose. 2007. Massive Microbiological Groundwater Contamination As-
sociated with a Waterborne Outbreak in Lake Erie, South Bass Island, Ohio.
Environmental Health Perspectives 115: 856–864.
Fout, S., B. C. Martinson, M. W. N. Moyer, and D. R. Dahling. 2003. A multi-
plex reverse transcription--PCR method for detection of human enteric vi-
ruses in groundwater. Appl. Envir. Microbiology 69(6):3158-3164.
Fox, P., K. Naranaswamy, and J. E. Drewes. 2001. Water Quality Transforma-
tions during Soil Aquifer Treatment at the Mesa Northwest Water Reclama-
tion Plant, USA. Water Science and Technology 43(10):343-350.
Gardner, T. B. and D. R. Hill. Treatment of Giardiasis. Clinical Microbiology
Reviews 14(1):114-128
Haas, C. N., J. Rose, and C. Gerba. 1999. Quantitative microbial risk
assessment. New York:John Wiley & Sons.
Hancock C. M., J. B. Rose, and M. Callahan. 1998. Cryptosporidium and
Giardia in US groundwater. J Am Water Works Assoc 90(3):58-61.
Havelaar, A.H., M. van Olphen, and Y. C. Drost. 1993. F-specific RNA
bacteriophages are adequate model organisms for enteric viruses in fresh
water. Applied Environmental Microbiology 59(9):2956-2962.
Heberer, T., I. M.Verstraeten, M. T Meyer, A. Mechlinski, and K. Reddersen.
2001. Occurrence and Fate of Pharmaceuticals during Bank Filtration –
Preliminary Results from Investigations in Germany and the United States.
Water Resources Update 120:4-17.
OCR for page 297
330 PROSPECTS FOR MANAGED UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF RECOVERABLE WATER
Heberer, T. 2002. Occurrence, Fate, and Removal of Pharmaceutical Residues
in the Aquatic Environment: A Review of Recent Research Data.
Toxicology Letters 131:5-17.
Hem, J.D. 1985. Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of
natural water, 3rd edition. USGS Water-Supply Paper 2254. Alexandria,
VA: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Hulten, K., S. W. Han, H. Enroth, P. D.Klein, A. R. Opekun, R. H. Gilman, D.
G. Evans, L. Engstrand, D. Y. Graham, and F. El-Zaatari. 1996.
Helicobacter pylori in the drinking water in Peru. Gastroenterology,
110:1031-1035.
Keller D. W., R. Hajjeh, A. DeMaria, Jr, B. S. Fields, J. M. Pruckler, R. S.
Benson, P. E. Kludt, S. M. Lett, L. A. Mermel, C. Giorgio, and R. F.
Breiman. 1996. Community outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease: an
investigation confirming the potential for cooling towers to transmit
Legionella species. Clin Infect Dis. 22:257–261.
Kolpin, D.W., E.T. Furlong, M.T. Meyer, E.M. Thurman, S.D. Zaugg, L.B.
Barber, and H.T. Buxton. 2002. Pharmaceuticals, hormones and other
organic waste water contaminants in U.S. streams, 1990-2000: A National
Reconnaissance. Environmental Science and Technology 36:1202-1211.
LeClerc, H., D. A. A. Mossel, S. C. Edberg, and C. B. Struijk. 2001. Advances
in the bacteriology of the coliform group: Their suitability as markers of
microbial water safety. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55:201-234.
Ma, H., H. Allen, and Y. Yin. 2001. Characterization of Isolated Fractions of
Dissolved Organic Matter from Natural Water and Wastewater Effluents.
Water Research 35(4): 985-996.
Mac Kenzie, W. R., N. J. Hoxie, M. E. Proctor, M. S. Gradus, K. A. Blair, D. E.
Peterson, J. J. Kazmierczak, D. G. Addiss, K. R. Fox, J. B. Rose, and J. P.
Davis. 1994. A Massive Outbreak in Milwaukee of Cryptosporidium
Infection Transmitted through the Public Water Supply. N Engl J Med
331(15):1035.
Mara, D., and N. Horan. 2003. The Handbook of Water and Wastewater
Microbiology. San Diego, California:Academic Press.
Marciano-Cabral, F., R. MacLean, A. Mensah, and L. LaPat-Polasko. 2003.
Identification of Naegleria fowleri in Domestic Water Sources by Nested
PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 69:5864–5869.
Marston, B. J., J. F. Plouffe, T. M. File, B. A. Hackman, S. J. Salstrom, H. B.
Lipman, M. S. Kolczak, and R. F. Breiman. 1997. Incidence of community-
acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization—results of a population-
based active surveillance study in Ohio. Arch. Intern. Med. 157:1709-1718.
National Academy of Sciences. 1977. Drinking Water and Health, Vol. 1.
Washington, D.C: .National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2004. Indicators for Waterborne Pathogens.
Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
OCR for page 297
APPENDIX A 331
Rolle-Kampczyk, U., J. G. Fritz, U. Diez, I. Lehmann, M. Richter, and O.
Herbarth. 2004. Well water – one source of Helicobacter pylori
colonization. Int J Hyg Environ Health 207:363–368.
Rose J. B, J. T. Lisle, and C. N. Haas. 1996. Role of Pathogen Monitoring in
Microbial Risk Assessment. Pp. 73-98 in Modeling Disease Transmission
and its Prevention by Disinfection. Cambridge, United Kingdom:
Cambridge University Press.
Rose, J.B., D. E. Huffman, and A. Gennaccaro. 2002. Risk and Control of
Waterborne Cryptosporidiosis. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 26:113-123.
Smith, H. V. and J. B. Rose. 1998. Waterborne Cryptosporidiosis: Current
Status. Parasitology Today 14:14–22.
Stout, J. E. and V. L. Yu. 1997. Current concepts: Legionellosis. N Engl J Med
337(10):682-687.
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. 1970. Radiological Health
Handbook, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., Stock No.
017-011-00043-0.
Vandenburg O. 2004. Arcobacter species in humans. Emerg Infect Dis 10:1863-
1867.
Viessman, W. Jr. and M.J. Hammer. 2005. Water Supply and Pollution Control,
7th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wesley, I.V. 1997. Helicobacter and Arcobacter: Potential Human Foodborne
Pathogens? Trends Food Sci Technol 8(9):293-299.
OCR for page 297