Cover Image

HARDBACK
$48.95



View/Hide Left Panel

Appendix 3-4
Estimated Adjusted Mean Effects and Differences Based on the Modeled Probability of at Least One Female Candidate Intervieweda

Effects

Mean Odds Ratios (Lower, Upper 95% Confidence Limits)

Disciplines

 

Biology

0.51 (0.25, 0.76)

Chemistry

0.80 (0.68, 0.91)

Mathematics

0.80 (0.64, 0.96)

Electrical engineering

0.84 (0.72, 0.96)

Physics

0.84 (0.73, 0.95)

Civil engineering

0.81 (0.66, 0.96)

Type of position

 

Tenured

0.73 (0.59, 0.86)

Tenure-track

0.82 (0.74, 0.91)

Tenured – tenure-track

0.57 (0.22, 0.93)

Type of institution

 

Private 0.79

(0.67, 0.92)

Public

0.77 (0.65, 0.92)

Private – public

1.17 (0.19, 2.16)

Prestige of institution

 

Top 10

0.82 (0.72, 0.91)

Next 10

0.75 (0.59, 0.91)

Remaining institutions

0.77 (0.62, 0.92)

Top 10 – Next 10

1.50 (0.39, 2.62)

Top 10 – Remaining

1.33 (0.02, 2.65)

Next 10 – Remaining

0.89 (–0.13, 1.90)

Search committee chair

 

Male

0.77 (0.62, 0.93)

Female

0.78 (0.71, 0.86)

Male – female

0.95 (0.16, 1.74)



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 287
Appendix 3-4 Estimated Adjusted Mean Effects and Differences Based on the Modeled Probability of at Least One Female Candidate Intervieweda Mean Odds Ratios Effects (Lower, Upper 95% Confidence Limits) Disciplines Biology 0.51 (0.25, 0.76) Chemistry 0.80 (0.68, 0.91) Mathematics 0.80 (0.64, 0.96) Electrical engineering 0.84 (0.72, 0.96) Physics 0.84 (0.73, 0.95) Civil engineering 0.81 (0.66, 0.96) Type of position Tenured 0.73 (0.59, 0.86) Tenure-track 0.82 (0.74, 0.91) Tenured – tenure-track 0.57 (0.22, 0.93) Type of institution Private 0.79 (0.67, 0.92) Public 0.77 (0.65, 0.92) Private – public 1.17 (0.19, 2.16) Prestige of institution Top 10 0.82 (0.72, 0.91) Next 10 0.75 (0.59, 0.91) Remaining institutions 0.77 (0.62, 0.92) Top 10 – Next 10 1.50 (0.39, 2.62) Top 10 – Remaining 1.33 (0.02, 2.65) Next 10 – Remaining 0.89 (–0.13, 1.90) Search committee chair Male 0.77 (0.62, 0.93) Female 0.78 (0.71, 0.86) Male – female 0.95 (0.16, 1.74) 

OCR for page 287
 GENDER DIFFERENCES IN FACULTy CAREERS Ratio Of Mean Odds Ratios Effects (Lower, Upper 95% Confidence Limits) Differences across disciplines Biology – Chemistry 0.26 (–0.04, 0.55) Biology – Mathematics 0.26 (–0.08, 0.59) Biology – Electrical engineering 0.19 (–0.06, 0.45) Biology – Physics 0.19 (–0.04, 0.42) Biology – Civil engineering 0.24 (–0.08, 0.56) Chemistry – Mathematics 0.99 (–0.01, 2.00) Chemistry – Electrical engineering 0.75 (0.06, 1.44) Chemistry – Physics 0.75 (–0.01, 1.50) Chemistry – Civil engineering 0.94 (0.03, 1.85) Mathematics – Electrical engineering 0.76 (–0.11, 1.62) Mathematics – Physics 0.75 (–0.03, 1.53) Mathematics – Civil engineering 0.95 (–0.30, 2.19) Electrical engineering – Physics 0.99 (0.07, 1.92) Electrical engineering – Civil engineering 1.25 (0.13, 2.37) Physics – Civil engineering 1.26 (0.10, 2.41) Type of position Tenured – tenure-track 0.57 (0.22, 0.93) Type of institution Private – public 1.17 (0.19, 2.16) Prestige of institution Top 10 – Next 10 1.50 (0.39, 2.62) Top 10 – Remaining 1.33 (0.02, 2.65) Next 10 – Remaining 0.89 (–0.13, 1.90) Search committee chair Male – female 0.95 (0.16, 1.74) a The sample size used to fit this model was 667. For differences across effect level, the mean rep- resents the ratio of odds ratios between the two factor levels. b The same effects were fit as in Appendix 3-2. SOURCE: Departmental survey conducted by the Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty.