National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$48.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty (2010)
Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine (CWSEM)
Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix 4-1: Distribution of Undergraduate Course Load for Faculty by Gender and Discipline." Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
296
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty

Appendix 4-1
Distribution of Undergraduate Course Load for Faculty by Gender and Discipline

Two statistical tests were carried out. First, a chi-square test of independence of rows was applied to determine whether the pattern of the number of undergraduate courses taught1 by men and women differed. (These tests were either on three or four degrees of freedom.) The tests were not significant at the .05 level except for electrical engineering. It is important to mention that one could have different patterns without having women teach more of fewer courses. For instance, men might teach 1 or 2 courses more often than women do, who in turn might teach 0 or 3 courses more often, but where the mean number of courses remained close.

Therefore, we added a simple two-sample t-test of the average number of courses for men and women. The means are displayed below for each of the disciplinary areas. The t-tests were all not significant at the .05 for the null hypothesis of no difference, again except for electrical engineering. It is clear from the table that men teach more undergraduate courses than do women.

BIOLOGY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Courses Taught

0

1

2

3

4

Total

Men

31

55

12

2

0

100

Women

31

58

11

2

2

104

Total

62

113

23

4

2

204

Chi-squared test of independence: 2.05 (4 degrees of freedom), p-value 0.73.

Means: Men .85 vs. Women .90, t-test is equal to –0.51 p-value 0.61.

CHEMISTRY

 

 

 

 

 

Courses Taught

0

1

2

3

Total

Men

43

49

8

1

101

Women

43

48

4

2

97

Total

86

97

12

3

198

Chi-squared test of independence: 1.60 (3 degrees of freedom), p-value 0.66.

Means: Men .67 vs. Women .64, t-test is equal to 0.36 p-value 0.72.

1

Fractional courses were rounded up to the nearest integral number of courses. Missing data was removed from the data prior to analysis. Finally, the data were from the committee’s survey of faculty.

Page
296
Front Matter (R1-R18)
Summary (1-14)
1 Introduction (15-30)
2 Status of Women in Academic Science and Engineering in 2004 and 2005 (31-38)
3 Gender Differences in Academic Hiring (39-69)
4 Professional Activities, Institutional Resources, Climate, and Outcomes (70-115)
5 Gender Differences in Tenure and Promotion (116-152)
6 Key Findings and Recommendations (153-168)
Appendixes (169-170)
Appendix 1-1: Biographical Information on Committee Members (171-177)
Appendix 1-2: List of Research I Institutions (178-178)
Appendix 1-3: Committee Meeting Agenda (179-180)
Appendix 1-4: The Surveys (181-188)
Appendix 1-5: Survey Instruments (189-215)
Appendix 1-6: Departments in Survey (216-248)
Appendix 2-1: Review of Literature and Relevant Research (249-266)
Appendix 2-2: Previous Research on Factors Contributing to Gender Differences Among Faculty (267-274)
Appendix 3-1: Review of Literature and Research on Factors Associated with a Higher Proportion of Female Applicants (275-283)
Appendix 3-2: Estimated Adjusted Mean Effects and Differences for the Probability That There Are No Female Applicants (284-284)
Appendix 3-3: Estimated Adjusted Mean Effects and Differences Based on the Modeled Probability of the Percentage of Applicants That Are Female (285-286)
Appendix 3-4: Estimated Adjusted Mean Effects and Differences Based on the Modeled Probability of at Least One Female Candidate Interviewed (287-288)
Appendix 3-5: Doctoral Degrees Awarded by All Doctoral-Granting Institutions, by Field, Gender, and Year (289-289)
Appendix 3-6: Doctoral Degrees Awarded by Discipline and Gender for Research I Institutions, 1999-2003 (290-290)
Appendix 3-7: Marginal Mean and Variance of Transformed Response Variables (291-294)
Appendix 3-8: Main Considerations for Taking a Position by Number of Respondents Saying "Yes" (295-295)
Appendix 4-1: Distribution of Undergraduate Course Load for Faculty by Gender and Discipline (296-297)
Appendix 4-2: Percentage of Faculty Members Who Do No Graduate Teaching (298-298)
Appendix 4-3: Percentage of Faculty Members Receiving a Reduced Teaching Load When Hired (299-299)
Appendix 4-4: Percentage of Faculty Members Who Served on an Undergraduate Thesis or Honors Committee (300-300)
Appendix 4-5: Percentage of Faculty Members Who Served on and Chaired an Undergraduate Thesis or Honors Committee (301-301)
Appendix 4-6: Distribution of Number of Graduate Thesis or Honors Committees for Research I Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty: Men/Women (302-302)
Appendix 4-7: Percentage of Time Spent in Administration or Committee Work on Campus and Service to the Profession Outside the University for Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty at Research I Institutions: Men/Women (303-303)
Appendix 4-8: Distribution of Number of Service Committees for Research I Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty: Men/Women (304-304)
Appendix 4-9: Mean Salary by Gender and Professorial Rank for Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions (305-305)
Appendix 4-10: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Summer Support (306-306)
Appendix 4-11: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Travel Funds (307-307)
Appendix 4-12: Median Square Footage of Lab Space of Faculty Who Report Doing Experimental Work (308-308)
Appendix 4-13: Faculty Who Have Received More Lab Space Since Hire (Values Are Percentages) (309-309)
Appendix 4-14: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Sufficient Equipment (310-310)
Appendix 4-15: Number of Postdoctorate Students for Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions (presented by Men and Women) (311-311)
Appendix 4-16: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Sufficient Clerical Support (312-312)
Appendix 4-17: Percentage of Faculty Members Stating That They Had a Mentor (313-313)
Appendix 4-18: Distribution of the Number of Graduate Students for Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions (presented by Men and Women) (314-314)
Appendix 4-19: Mean Number of Articles Published in Refereed Journals (sole and co-authored) Over the Past 3 Years for Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions (315-315)
Appendix 4-20a: Estimated Probability of Having Grant Funding by Discipline, Gender, and Whether the Faculty Member Has an Assigned Mentor - Assistant Professors Only (316-316)
Appendix 4-20b: Estimated Probability of Having Grant Funding by Discipline, Gender, and Whether the Faculty Member Has an Assigned Mentor - Associate Professors Only (317-317)
Appendix 4-21: Percentage of Faculty Missing Salary Data by Gender and Discipline (318-318)
Appendix 4-22: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty at Research I Institutions That Were Nominated for at Least One Award (319-319)
Appendix 4-23: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Research I Faculty with Offers to Leave (320-320)
Appendix 4-24: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty at Research I Institutions Planning to Leave or Retire (321-321)
Appendix 5-1: Knowledge of Tenure Procedures by Gender, Rank, and Presence of a Mentor (322-323)
Appendix 5-2: Detailed Tenure Information from Departmental Survey (324-324)
Appendix 5-3: Time Spent in Both Assistant and Associate Professorships (325-325)
Appendix 5-4: Years Between Starting Employment and Achieving Associate Professor Status, by Gender (326-326)
Appendix 5-5: Years Between Starting Employment and Achieving Full Professor Status, by Gender (327-327)
Appendix 5-6: Patterns of Nonresponse for Tenure Decisions (328-328)
Appendix 5-7: Patterns of Nonresponse for Promotion Decisions (329-329)
Bibliography (330-352)
Index (353-366)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 296
Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty Appendix 4-1 Distribution of Undergraduate Course Load for Faculty by Gender and Discipline Two statistical tests were carried out. First, a chi-square test of independence of rows was applied to determine whether the pattern of the number of undergraduate courses taught1 by men and women differed. (These tests were either on three or four degrees of freedom.) The tests were not significant at the .05 level except for electrical engineering. It is important to mention that one could have different patterns without having women teach more of fewer courses. For instance, men might teach 1 or 2 courses more often than women do, who in turn might teach 0 or 3 courses more often, but where the mean number of courses remained close. Therefore, we added a simple two-sample t-test of the average number of courses for men and women. The means are displayed below for each of the disciplinary areas. The t-tests were all not significant at the .05 for the null hypothesis of no difference, again except for electrical engineering. It is clear from the table that men teach more undergraduate courses than do women. BIOLOGY             Courses Taught 0 1 2 3 4 Total Men 31 55 12 2 0 100 Women 31 58 11 2 2 104 Total 62 113 23 4 2 204 Chi-squared test of independence: 2.05 (4 degrees of freedom), p-value 0.73. Means: Men .85 vs. Women .90, t-test is equal to –0.51 p-value 0.61. CHEMISTRY           Courses Taught 0 1 2 3 Total Men 43 49 8 1 101 Women 43 48 4 2 97 Total 86 97 12 3 198 Chi-squared test of independence: 1.60 (3 degrees of freedom), p-value 0.66. Means: Men .67 vs. Women .64, t-test is equal to 0.36 p-value 0.72. 1 Fractional courses were rounded up to the nearest integral number of courses. Missing data was removed from the data prior to analysis. Finally, the data were from the committee’s survey of faculty.

OCR for page 297
Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty MATHEMATICS           Courses Taught 0 1 2 3 Total Men 21 30 15 2 68 Women 22 38 24 0 84 Total 43 68 39 2 152 Chi-squared test of independence: 3.39 (3 degrees of freedom), p-value 0.33. Means: Men .97 vs. Women 1.02, t-test is equal to –0.42 p-value 0.68. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING           Courses Taught 0 1 2 3 Total Men 33 46 14 1 94 Women 44 41 4 2 91 Total 77 87 18 3 185 Chi-squared test of independence: 7.70 (3 degrees of freedom), p-value 0.05. Means: Men .82 vs. Women .60, t-test is equal to 2.09 p-value 0.04. PHYSICS           Courses Taught 0 1 2 3 Total Men 33 53 9 0 95 Women 31 66 14 1 112 Total 64 119 23 1 207 Chi-squared test of independence: 2.19 (3 degrees of freedom), p-value 0.53. Means: Men .75 vs. Women .87, t-test is equal to –1.34 p-value 0.18. CIVIL ENGINEERING             Courses Taught 0 1 2 3 4 Total Men 22 44 13 4 0 83 Women 36 67 13 3 1 120 Total 58 111 26 7 1 203 Chi-squared test of independence: 2.63 (4 degrees of freedom), p-value 0.62. Means: Men .99 vs. Women .88, t-test is equal to 0.94 p-value 0.35.