Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

HARDBACK price:$48.95 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources PDF SUMMARY Display this book on your site! Related Titles Colloquy on Minority Males in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics From Science to Business: Preparing Female Scientists and Engineers for Successful Transitions into Entrepreneurship: Summary of a Workshop Other Related Titles Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty (2010) Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine (CWSEM) Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager . "Appendix 5-1: Knowledge of Tenure Procedures by Gender, Rank, and Presence of a Mentor." Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010. Please select a format: Page 322   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. Appendix 5-1 Knowledge of Tenure Procedures by Gender, Rank, and Presence of a Mentor Presence of a Mentor by Gender and Rank Rank Gender Men Women Professor 19 (279) 28 (233) Associate professor 55 (194) 93 (255) Assistant professor 108 (208) 142 (235) NOTES: Sample sizes are in parentheses. For example, of 279 respondents, 19 male full professors stated that they had a mentor at some point in their careers. SOURCE: Survey of faculty conducted by the Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty. Knowledge of Institutional Tenure Policies by Gender and Presence of a Mentor Response Men Women Mentor No Mentor Mentor No Mentor No institutional tenure policy present 3 2 2 4 Tenure policy present but not known 30 39 27 42 Knows institution’s tenure policies 136 387 221 357 NOTES: A total of 84 men (13 with mentors) and 70 women (13 with mentors) chose not to respond to this question. SOURCE: Survey of faculty conducted by the Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty. Page 322 Front Matter (R1-R18) Summary (1-14) 1 Introduction (15-30) 2 Status of Women in Academic Science and Engineering in 2004 and 2005 (31-38) 3 Gender Differences in Academic Hiring (39-69) 4 Professional Activities, Institutional Resources, Climate, and Outcomes (70-115) 5 Gender Differences in Tenure and Promotion (116-152) 6 Key Findings and Recommendations (153-168) Appendixes (169-170) Appendix 1-1: Biographical Information on Committee Members (171-177) Appendix 1-2: List of Research I Institutions (178-178) Appendix 1-3: Committee Meeting Agenda (179-180) Appendix 1-4: The Surveys (181-188) Appendix 1-5: Survey Instruments (189-215) Appendix 1-6: Departments in Survey (216-248) Appendix 2-1: Review of Literature and Relevant Research (249-266) Appendix 2-2: Previous Research on Factors Contributing to Gender Differences Among Faculty (267-274) Appendix 3-1: Review of Literature and Research on Factors Associated with a Higher Proportion of Female Applicants (275-283) Appendix 3-2: Estimated Adjusted Mean Effects and Differences for the Probability That There Are No Female Applicants (284-284) Appendix 3-3: Estimated Adjusted Mean Effects and Differences Based on the Modeled Probability of the Percentage of Applicants That Are Female (285-286) Appendix 3-4: Estimated Adjusted Mean Effects and Differences Based on the Modeled Probability of at Least One Female Candidate Interviewed (287-288) Appendix 3-5: Doctoral Degrees Awarded by All Doctoral-Granting Institutions, by Field, Gender, and Year (289-289) Appendix 3-6: Doctoral Degrees Awarded by Discipline and Gender for Research I Institutions, 1999-2003 (290-290) Appendix 3-7: Marginal Mean and Variance of Transformed Response Variables (291-294) Appendix 3-8: Main Considerations for Taking a Position by Number of Respondents Saying "Yes" (295-295) Appendix 4-1: Distribution of Undergraduate Course Load for Faculty by Gender and Discipline (296-297) Appendix 4-2: Percentage of Faculty Members Who Do No Graduate Teaching (298-298) Appendix 4-3: Percentage of Faculty Members Receiving a Reduced Teaching Load When Hired (299-299) Appendix 4-4: Percentage of Faculty Members Who Served on an Undergraduate Thesis or Honors Committee (300-300) Appendix 4-5: Percentage of Faculty Members Who Served on and Chaired an Undergraduate Thesis or Honors Committee (301-301) Appendix 4-6: Distribution of Number of Graduate Thesis or Honors Committees for Research I Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty: Men/Women (302-302) Appendix 4-7: Percentage of Time Spent in Administration or Committee Work on Campus and Service to the Profession Outside the University for Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty at Research I Institutions: Men/Women (303-303) Appendix 4-8: Distribution of Number of Service Committees for Research I Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty: Men/Women (304-304) Appendix 4-9: Mean Salary by Gender and Professorial Rank for Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions (305-305) Appendix 4-10: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Summer Support (306-306) Appendix 4-11: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Travel Funds (307-307) Appendix 4-12: Median Square Footage of Lab Space of Faculty Who Report Doing Experimental Work (308-308) Appendix 4-13: Faculty Who Have Received More Lab Space Since Hire (Values Are Percentages) (309-309) Appendix 4-14: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Sufficient Equipment (310-310) Appendix 4-15: Number of Postdoctorate Students for Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions (presented by Men and Women) (311-311) Appendix 4-16: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Sufficient Clerical Support (312-312) Appendix 4-17: Percentage of Faculty Members Stating That They Had a Mentor (313-313) Appendix 4-18: Distribution of the Number of Graduate Students for Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions (presented by Men and Women) (314-314) Appendix 4-19: Mean Number of Articles Published in Refereed Journals (sole and co-authored) Over the Past 3 Years for Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions (315-315) Appendix 4-20a: Estimated Probability of Having Grant Funding by Discipline, Gender, and Whether the Faculty Member Has an Assigned Mentor - Assistant Professors Only (316-316) Appendix 4-20b: Estimated Probability of Having Grant Funding by Discipline, Gender, and Whether the Faculty Member Has an Assigned Mentor - Associate Professors Only (317-317) Appendix 4-21: Percentage of Faculty Missing Salary Data by Gender and Discipline (318-318) Appendix 4-22: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty at Research I Institutions That Were Nominated for at Least One Award (319-319) Appendix 4-23: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Research I Faculty with Offers to Leave (320-320) Appendix 4-24: Percentage of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty at Research I Institutions Planning to Leave or Retire (321-321) Appendix 5-1: Knowledge of Tenure Procedures by Gender, Rank, and Presence of a Mentor (322-323) Appendix 5-2: Detailed Tenure Information from Departmental Survey (324-324) Appendix 5-3: Time Spent in Both Assistant and Associate Professorships (325-325) Appendix 5-4: Years Between Starting Employment and Achieving Associate Professor Status, by Gender (326-326) Appendix 5-5: Years Between Starting Employment and Achieving Full Professor Status, by Gender (327-327) Appendix 5-6: Patterns of Nonresponse for Tenure Decisions (328-328) Appendix 5-7: Patterns of Nonresponse for Promotion Decisions (329-329) Bibliography (330-352) Index (353-366)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 322
Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty Appendix 5-1 Knowledge of Tenure Procedures by Gender, Rank, and Presence of a Mentor Presence of a Mentor by Gender and Rank Rank Gender Men Women Professor 19 (279) 28 (233) Associate professor 55 (194) 93 (255) Assistant professor 108 (208) 142 (235) NOTES: Sample sizes are in parentheses. For example, of 279 respondents, 19 male full professors stated that they had a mentor at some point in their careers. SOURCE: Survey of faculty conducted by the Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty. Knowledge of Institutional Tenure Policies by Gender and Presence of a Mentor Response Men Women Mentor No Mentor Mentor No Mentor No institutional tenure policy present 3 2 2 4 Tenure policy present but not known 30 39 27 42 Knows institution’s tenure policies 136 387 221 357 NOTES: A total of 84 men (13 with mentors) and 70 women (13 with mentors) chose not to respond to this question. SOURCE: Survey of faculty conducted by the Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty.

OCR for page 323
Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty Knowledge of Institutional Promotion Policies by Gender and Rank Response Men Women Professor Assoc. Professor Asst. Professor Professor Assoc. Professor Asst. Professor No institutional promotion policy present 1 1 3 3 4 3 Promotion policy present but not known 16 29 71 12 68 90 Knows institution’s promotion policies 221 141 115 164 158 130 NOTES: A total of 83 men (41 professors, 23 associate professors, and 19 assistant professors) and 71 women (34 professors, 25 associate professors, and 12 assistant professors) chose not to respond to this. SOURCE: Survey of faculty conducted by the Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty.