|
|
Software
|
Semiconductors
|
Automobiles
|
Construction Engineering/ Services
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
PC Manufacturing
|
|
1. Nature of engineering work
|
Scope of work that can be spatially disaggregated is growing.
|
Disaggregated business models, functional integration in products.
|
Increasing pressure to increase efficiency, more open innovation process.
|
Supply of workers in the industry is a problem.
|
Increasingly difficult environment for business models based on blockbuster drugs.
|
Disaggregated business mode grew up in the 1990s.
|
|
2. Current status regarding globalization
|
Strong capabilities in several countries, distributed development increasingly common.
|
Globalization has complemented U.S. innovation/market leadership.
|
Successive waves of globalization, “build where you sell,” emergence of global suppliers.
|
Large project sector more globalized than building/ residential sector.
|
Increasing consolidation, globalization of companies and markets.
|
Engineering and manufacturing increasingly concentrated in China.
|
|
3. U.S. engineering workforce
|
Increasing, expected to grow over the next decade.
|
Sustained growth over time, less opportunity for older and less-skilled, increase in foreign-born.
|
Total employment down over the long-term, same is true for engineers.
|
Aging—low starting salaries discourage U.S. civil engineering grads.
|
Appears to be growing, though life sciences may be growing faster than engineering.
|
Fairly small
|
|
4. Countries where work is expanding
|
India in particular, evidence of growth in other countries.
|
India
|
China, India, wherever the automotive market is expanding.
|
Large range of offshoring destinations, in addition to India and China, Eastern Europe is attracting work.
|
China, India, United States still attracts innovation investment.
|
China, Taiwan
|
|
5. Offshoring occurring
|
Yes, driven by cost reduction, extent of high-value job losses uncertain.
|
Yes, cost reduction a primary motivator.
|
Yes, both through global optimization of platform development and through offshoring of routine tasks; also onshoring.
|
Yes, growth of global teams in the large project sector.
|
Yes, began with clinical trials and is moving up the value chain, but limits on end-to-end; also significant onshoring.
|
Yes, only limited engineering work remains in the United States.
|
|
6. Work that is more or less vulnerable
|
More vulnerable: standardized service and maintenance; Less vulnerable: Interface with final customer.
|
Product definition is less vulnerable.
|
Less vulnerable: Work on vehicle types where the United States is the leading market (e.g. large pick-ups); work where high degree of domain knowledge is needed.
|
Less vulnerable: Work where high degree of interaction with the customer is necessary.
|
More vulnerable: clinical trials; Less vulnerable: the most sophisticated R&D.
|
Less vulnerable; high level definition of product characteristics; most other engineering work is gone already.
|
|
7. Future outlook
|
Diversification of destination countries, increase in value-added of offshored work.
|
Continued globalization of engineering work.
|
Fortunes of leading global OEMs diverging, U.S. engineering fortunes have more to do with competitive success of companies than offshoring per se.
|
Will increase, although there are limitations on offshoring due to licensing, government procurement regulations, national/homeland security concerns.
|
U.S. engineering employment not likely to be impacted by offshoring.
|
Companies that can innovate will need at least some U.S. engineers; Taiwanese engineering will be offshored to China.
|