. "1 Introduction." Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program's Draft Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.4: Trends in Emissions of Ozone Depleting Substances, Ozone Layer Recovery, and Implications for Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Review of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program’s Draft Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.4: Trends in Emissions of Ozone Depleting Substances, Ozone Layer Recovery, and Implications for Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure
Ozone Layer Recovery, and Implications for Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure (draft dated August 20, 2007). Next, the committee met with the SAP authoring team, who provided in-depth presentations of their research and material used to formulate the draft document. The committee met in closed session to discuss the draft SAP in detail. This present report constitutes the committee’s peer review of SAP 2.4 and results from the committee’s careful study of the draft and its interactions with those present at the meeting. This report includes the committee’s findings, recommendations, suggestions, and options for the authors to consider in finalizing SAP 2.4.
The Statement of Task for the NRC Committee
The committee will address the following review criteria (which are based on the NRC's own review criteria):
Are the goals, objectives and intended audience of the product clearly described in the document? Does the product address all questions outlined in the prospectus?
Are any findings and/or recommendations adequately supported by evidence and analysis? In cases where recommendations might be based on expert value judgments or the collective opinions of the authors, is this acknowledged and supported by sound reasoning?
Are the data and analyses handled in a competent manner? Are statistical methods applied appropriately?
Are the document's presentation, level of technicality, and organization effective? Are the questions outlined in the prospectus addressed and communicated in a manner that is appropriate and accessible for the intended audience?
Is the document scientifically objective and policy neutral? Is it consistent with the scientific literature?
Is there a summary that effectively, concisely and accurately describes the key findings and recommendations? Is it consistent with other sections of the document?
What other significant improvements, if any, might be made in the document?
The following two chapters provide detailed comments for improving SAP 2.4. Chapter 2 of this report presents the committee’s overarching comments, which span more than one section of the SAP. Chapter 3 of this report provides both major and specific comments for the individual sections of the SAP.
CCSP (U.S. Climate Change Science Program). 2007. CCSP Synthesis and AssessmentProduct 2.4: Prospectus for Trends in Emissions of Ozone-Depleting Substances,Ozone Layer Recovery, and Implications for Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure. Washington, DC: U.S. Climate Change Science Program. Available online: http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap2-4/sap2-4prospectus-final.pdf.