REFERENCES

Abramson, F. (2004, November 17). Census 2000 testing, experimentation, and evaluation program summary results. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available: http://www.census.gov/pred/www/rpts/TXE%20Program%20Summary.pdf.

Box, G.E.P., and Hunter, J.S. (1961), The 2kp fractional factorial designs. Part I (Corr: V5 p417). Technometrics, 3, 311-351.

Buscher, M., and Stamm, H. (2001). E-census: The 2000 census on the Internet—Concept and stock-taking. Paper contributed to the Second Swiss eGovernment Symposium, August 22, 2001, Zurich.

Bye, B.V., and Judson, D.H. (2004). Results from the administrative records experiment in 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Topic Report 16. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Caspar, R. (2004). Results from the response mode and incentive experiment in 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Topic Report 18. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Cohen, J. (2000, March 9). 2000 census (shhh!) on the net. New York Times.

Crowley, M. (2003). Generation X speaks out on civic engagement and the decennial census: An ethnographic approach. Census 2000 Ethnographic Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Decennial Management Division (2003, May). Reengineering the decennial census: The baseline design for 2010. Version 1.5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

de la Puente, M., and McKay, R. (1995). Developing and testing race and ethnic origin questions from the Current Population Survey Supplement on Race and Ethnic Origin. In Proceedings of the 1994 Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association: Section on Survey Research Methods, Vol. 1.

Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.

Dillman, D.A., Clark, J.R., and Sinclair, M.D. (1993). How prenotice letters, stamped envelopes and reminder postcards affect mailback response rates for census questionnaires. In Annual research conference proceedings. U.S. Census Bureau. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 51
REFERENCES Abramson, F. (2004, November 17). Census 2000 testing, experimentation, and evaluation program summary results. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available: http://www.census.gov/pred/www/rpts/TXE%20Program%20Summary.pdf. Box, G.E.P., and Hunter, J.S. (1961), The 2k−p fractional factorial designs. Part I (Corr: V5 p417). Technometrics, 3, 311-351. Buscher, M., and Stamm, H. (2001). E-census: The 2000 census on the Internet— Concept and stock-taking. Paper contributed to the Second Swiss eGovernment Symposium, August 22, 2001, Zurich. Bye, B.V., and Judson, D.H. (2004). Results from the administrative records experiment in 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Topic Report 16. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Caspar, R. (2004). Results from the response mode and incentive experiment in 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Topic Report 18. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Cohen, J. (2000, March 9). 2000 census (shhh!) on the net. New York Times. Crowley, M. (2003). Generation X speaks out on civic engagement and the decennial census: An ethnographic approach. Census 2000 Ethnographic Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Decennial Management Division (2003, May). Reengineering the decennial census: The baseline design for 2010. Version 1.5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. de la Puente, M., and McKay, R. (1995). Developing and testing race and ethnic origin questions from the Current Population Survey Supplement on Race and Ethnic Origin. In Proceedings of the 1994 Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association: Section on Survey Research Methods, Vol. 1. Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley. Dillman, D.A., Clark, J.R., and Sinclair, M.D. (1993). How prenotice letters, stamped envelopes and reminder postcards affect mailback response rates for census questionnaires. In Annual research conference proceedings. U.S. Census Bureau. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. 51

OCR for page 51
Dillman, D.A., Clark, J.R., and Treat, J.B. (1994). Influence of 13 design factors on completion rates to decennial census questionnaires. in Annual research conference proceedings. U.S. Census Bureau. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Dolson, D. (2006). Efficient multi mode data collection in a census context. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Duquet, L., and Gilmour, G. (2007). 2006 Census online project. Presentation at the Statistics Canada IT Conference, April. Gerber, E. (2003). Privacy schemas and data collection: An ethnographic account. Census 2000 Ethnographic Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Griffin, D.H., Fischer, D.P., and Morgan, M.T. (2001). Testing an Internet response option for the American Community Survey. Paper presented at American Association for Public Opinion Research annual conference, Montreal, May 17-20. Griffin, D.H., and Obenski, S.M. (2001, September 28). A demonstration of the operational feasibility of the American Community Survey. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Kincannon, C.L. (2006, June 6). The 2010 decennial census program. Prepared statement, testimony before the Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, and International Security of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. Kurihara, Naoki (2004). Some Issues in the 2005 Population Census of Japan. Statistics Bureau, Japan. Laroche, D. (2005). Evaluation report on Internet option of 2004 census test: Characteristics of electronic questionnaires, non-response rates, follow-up rates and qualitative issues. Working Paper 23, Work Session on Statistical Data Editing. Ottawa: United Nations Statistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe and Conference of European Statisticians. Larwood, L., and Trentham, S. (2004). Results from the social security number, privacy attitudes, and notification experiment experiment in census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Topic Report 19. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Martin, E. (2007). Final report of an experiment: Effects of a revised instruction, deadline, and final question series in the decennial mail short form. 2010 Census Memoranda Series #55. U.S. Census Bureau. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. 52

OCR for page 51
Martin, E.A., Gerber, E., and Redline, C. (2004). Census 2000 alternative questionnaire experiment. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Topic Report 17. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. McKay, R., and de la Puente, M. (1995). Research improves questions. Civil Rights Journal, 1(1). MITRE Corporation (2007, January 17). An assessment of the risks, costs, and benefits of including the Internet as a response option in the 2010 decennial census. Version 2.0. Report prepared for the U.S. Census Bureau. Moraleda, A.G. (2006). Census data collecting by Internet: Spanish experience in 2001. Working Paper 12, Work Session on Electronic Raw Data Reporting. Geneva: United Nations Statistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe and Conference of European Statisticians. Mule, Thomas (2002), “A.C.E. Revision II: Further Study of Person Duplication,” DSSD A.C.E. Revision II Memorandum Series #PP-51, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census, December 31, 2002. Mulry-Liggan, M. (1986). Overview and summary of the forward trace study. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Research Division Report Series, Number Census/SRD/RR-86-24. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Nash, F. (2000). Overview of the duplicate housing unit operations. Census 2000 Information Memorandum Number 78, November 7, 2000. U.S. Census Bureau. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. National Research Council (1985). The Bicentennial Census: New Directions for Methodology in 1990. Panel on Decennial Census Methodology, Constance F. Citro and Michael L. Cohen (eds.), Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington DC: The National Academy Press. National Research Council (1994). Counting People in the Information Age. Panel to Evaluate Alternative Census Methods, Duane L. Steffey and Norman M. Bradburn (eds.), Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington DC: The National Academy Press. National Research Council (2003). Planning the 2010 census: Second interim report. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, and Benjamin F. King, Editors. Washington DC: National Academies Press. National Research Council (2004a). Reengineering the 2010 census: Risks and challenges. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, and Benjamin F. King (eds.). Committee on National Statistics, Division of 53

OCR for page 51
Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2004b). The 2000 census: Counting under adversity. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Constance F. Citro, Daniel L. Cork, and Janet L. Norwood (eds.). Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2006). Once, only once, and in the right place: Residence rules in the decennial census. Panel on Residence Rules in the Decennial Census, Daniel L. Cork and Paul R. Voss (eds.). Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2007). Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and challenges. Panel on the Functionality and Usability of Data from the American Community Survey. Constance F. Citro and Graham Kalton (eds.), Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Office for National Statistics (2004, March). Information paper: The 2011 census: A design for England and Wales. London: Office for National Statistics. Rodriguez, C.E. (1994). Challenges and emerging issues: Race and ethnic identity among Latinos. In Proceedings from the Workshop on Race and Ethnicity Classification: An Assessment of the Federal Standards for Race and Ethnicity Classification. Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council, February 17-18. Schwede, L. (2003, August 27). Complex households and relationships in the decennial census and in ethnographic studies of six race/ethnic groups. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Smith, I. (2006). Using both Internet and field collection methods for the 2006 Census of Population and Dwellings. Invited paper for the Population Association of New Zealand Conference. Auckland: Statistics New Zealand. Statistics Canada (2007). Census technology: Recent developments and implications on census methodology—Census on the net. Paper presented for the tenth session of the Economic Commission for Europe, Conference of European Statisticians, Group of Experts on Population and Housing Censuses. ECE/CES/GE.41/2007/9. Statistics New Zealand (2007). Implications of the Internet census for the management of field operations. Paper prepared for the Joint UNECE/Eurostat Meeting on Population and Housing Censuses, Kazakhstan, June 4-6, 2007. 54

OCR for page 51
Swain, L., Drew, J.D., Lafrance, B., and Lance, K. (1992). The creation of a residential address register for coverage improvement in the 1991 Canadian Census. Survey Methodology, 18, 127-141. Trewin, D. (2006). How Australia takes a census. Report 2903.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2006). Conference of European Statisticians: Recommendations for the 2010 censuses of population and housing. Prepared in cooperation with the Statistical Office of the European Communities. ECE/CES/STAT/NONE/2006/4. New York and Geneva: United Nations. U.S. Census Bureau. (1997). Results of the 1996 race and ethnic targeted test. 20233- 8800, Population Division Working Paper No. 18, May. Population Division and Decennial Statistical Studies Division. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Census Bureau (2004, January 20). 2003 National Census Test: Contact strategy analysis. Final report, 2003 National Census Test Analysis. Decennial Statistical Studies Division and Planning, Research, and Evaluation Division. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General (2006). Enumerating group quarters continues to pose challenges. Final Inspection Report No. IPE-18046. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Whitworth, E. (2002, August 14). Internet data collection. Census 2000 Evaluation A.2.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Williams, P. (2006). The Australian 2006 census and the Internet. Working Paper 9, Work Session on Electronic Raw Data Reporting. Geneva: United Nations Statistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe and Conference of European Statisticians. 55