to incorporate broad scientific and technological expertise and include consumer/caregiver participation?

  • What are the areas in which technology is most needed: personal assistance, caregiver assistance, mobility, cognition, perception, awareness, sensation, vocation?

  • How can universal design principles be applied to increase technology acceptance and diffusion?

  • How can advances in robotics, artificial intelligence, rapid prototyping, machine learning, materials science, computing, activity monitoring, and modeling, etc. be adopted to benefit older people and people with disabilities?

  • Develop tools/measures/metrics to assess the impact of technology on activity, quality of life, cost, community participation, and health (beyond morbidity and mortality).

  • What are the critical biological and biocompatibility issues that need to be overcome?

  • Develop technological innovations that promote independence, community participation, and healthful living.

Initial References

Chavez, E., M. L. Boninger, R. Cooper, S. G. Fitzgerald, D. Gray, and R. A. Cooper. 2004. Application of a participation system to assess the influence of assistive technology on the lives of people with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 85(11):1854-1858.

Collins, D. M., S. G. Fitzgerald, N. Sachs-Ericsson, M. Scherer. R. A. Cooper, and M. L. Boninger. 2006. Psychosocial well-being and community participation of service dog partners. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 1(1-2):41-48.

Cooper, R. A. 2004. Bioengineering and spinal cord injury: A perspective on the state of the science. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 27(4):351-364.

Cooper, R. A., R. Cooper, M. Tolerico, S. F. Guo, D. Ding, and J. Pearlman. 2006. Advances in electric powered wheelchairs. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 11(4):15-29.

Iezzoni, L., E. McCarthy, R. Davis, and H. Siebens. 2001. Mobility difficulties are not only a problem of old age. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16(4):235-243.

Leuthardt, E. C., G. Schalk, D. Moran, and J. G. Ojemann. 2006. The emerging world of motor neuroprosthetics: A neurosurgical perspective. Neurosurgery 58:1-14.

Odenheimer, G. 2006. Driver safety in older adults: The physician’s role in assessing driving skills of older patients. Geriatrics 61(10):14-21.

Parasuraman, A. 2000. Technology readiness index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research 2(5):307-320.

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement