National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States (1985)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix F: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae type b." New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1985.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
236
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Vaccine Development Establishing Priorities, Volume I: Diseases of Importance in the United States

Studies on the noncapsular surface antigens of H. influenzae type b in several laboratories have revealed a number of distinct strains within type b (Hansen et al., 1982a; Loeb and Smith, 1980). The relative prevalence of these different strains as a cause of disease varies with geographic locale. More than 20 different subtypes have been identified, but 5 or 6 account for most H. influenzae type b illness (Hansen et al., 1982a; Loeb and Smith, 1980). Subtyping is primarily of epidemiologic value, because all type b strains are killed by anti-type b polysaccharide antibodies. The type b polysaccharide has been purified and its structure determined. The repeating unit is →3)-β-D-ribose-(1→1)-D-ribitol-5-phosphate.

Host Immune Response

Protection against invasive H. influenzae disease is due primarily to humoral immunity (Solotrovsky and Lynn, 1978). Protective antibodies are induced to both the capsular polysaccharide and major outer membrane surface proteins. Classic studies by Fothergill and Wright (1933) demonstrated an inverse relationship between the development of bactericidal antibodies and the age-related incidence of H. influenzae disease. The same inverse relationship has been demonstrated for antibodies directed against the type b capsular polysaccharide (Anderson et al., 1977).

Following the decline of maternally acquired immunity between two and three months of age, bactericidal antibodies generally are not detectable for about three years. They then rise slowly, reaching adult levels by about age eight. However, there is considerable individual variability in the pattern of antibody changes.

Clinical studies suggest a positive correlation between the presence of anti-type b antibodies and the relative absence of H. influenzae disease in children older than five years of age (Peltola et al., 1977). Passive protection studies in animals, primarily the infant rat, provide further evidence for the protective effects of antibodies against type b polysaccharide (Myerowitz and Norden, 1977).

There is strong evidence from the Finnish studies of the capsular polysaccharide (polyribophosphate) vaccine for the protective role of antibody in older children (Peltola et al., 1984). However, the committee believes the focus should be directed towards a vaccine that would be effective in younger children because of the distribution of the disease described below.

Magnitude of Disease Burden

Estimates of the disease burden imposed by H. influenzae type b are based primarily on information from Cochi (personal communication, 1983), Hill (1983), and Norden (1982). All cases of invasive illness caused by the organism are assumed to fall into generic Morbidity Category C. (Morbidity Categories are defined in Table F.2.)

Page
236
Front Matter (R1-R14)
1. Summary (1-16)
2. Priority Setting for Health Related Investments: A Review of Methods (17-27)
3. Overview of the Analytic Approach (28-38)
4. Comparison of Disease Burdens and Costs (39-58)
5. Predictions on Vaccine Development (59-66)
6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines (67-91)
7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines (92-120)
8. Additional Issues in the Selection of Priorities for Accelerated Vaccine Development (121-126)
9. Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (127-148)
Appendix A: Some Examples of the Application of Project Selection Method (149-152)
Appendix B: Pathogenic Agents for Which Accelerated Vaccine Development Does Not Appear Appropriate (153-170)
Appendix C: Prospects for Immunizing Against Bordetella pertussis (171-182)
Appendix D: Prospects for Immunizing Against Coccidioidomycosis (183-197)
Appendix E: Prospects for Immunizing Against Cytomegalovirus (198-234)
Appendix F: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae type b (235-251)
Appendix G: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis A Virus (252-260)
Appendix H: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis B Virus (261-279)
Appendix I: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpes Simplex Viruses 1 and 2 (280-312)
Appendix J: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpesvirus varicellae (313-341)
Appendix K: Prospects for Immunizing Against Influenza Viruses A and B (342-364)
Appendix L: Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (365-384)
Appendix M: Prospects for Immunizing Against Parainfluenza Viruses (385-396)
Appendix N: Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (397-409)
Appendix O: Prospects for Immunizing Against Rotavirus (410-423)
Appendix P: Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus group B (424-439)
Appendix Q: Questionnaire for Assessing Morbidity-Mortality Trade-Offs (440-443)
Appendix R: Technical Notes (444-444)
Appendix S: Biographical Notes on Committee Members (445-449)
Appendix T: Additional Sources of Advice to the Committee (450-452)
Index (453-458)