National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States (1985)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix I: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpes Simplex Viruses 1 and 2." New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1985.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
281
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Vaccine Development Establishing Priorities, Volume I: Diseases of Importance in the United States

include cytomegalovirus, Herpesvirus varicellae (varicella-zoster virus), and Epstein-Barr virus. All have the capacity for persistence in the human host (Nahmias and Josey, 1982).

HSV-1 and HSV-2 are complex viruses containing a large, double-stranded DNA genome coding for about 50 viral proteins. About half of HSV-1 and HSV-2 sequences are homologous. There has been some progress recently towards identifying the genes responsible for latency and carcinogenicity (Roizman et al., 1984).

Of particular importance to the prospects for immunization are the surface glycoproteins of the HSV-1 and HSV-2 viral envelopes. Herpes simplex viruses carry five major surface glycoproteins—designated gB, gC, gD, gE, and gG. Some of these glycoproteins (e.g., gD, gB, and gC) are known to induce high level neutralizing antibodies in naturally infected individuals, and are thought to be potential candidates for subunit vaccines. Genes coding for gD have been cloned and expressed in mammalian cell lines (Lasky et al., 1984).

Host Immune Response

The immunology of HSV infections has been reviewed recently by Shore and Nahmias (1981). In primary HSV infections, humoral antibodies can be detected within 1 to 3 weeks and assays of cellular immunity in vitro have demonstrated a cell-mediated response after a similar period.

It is not clear which of these responses leads to curtailment of primary infection in normal individuals. HSV infections in immunocompromised hosts tend to be severe and chronic.

Recurrence of latent HSV infection takes place in spite of the presence of circulating antibodies, probably because of the factors responsible for latency, about which very little is known. Hence, it probably will be necessary to stimulate immunity prior to exposure to achieve protection.

Vaccines containing viral glycoprotein surface antigens, prepared in chick embryo culture, have been shown to be effective in stimulating immunity and preventing disease in experimentally infected animals (Hilleman et al., 1981). Trials in humans are discussed below.

Disease Burden

Estimates for the disease burden are based on information from Nahmias and Josey (1982), and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1980, 1983); on advice from Bryson (personal communication, 1983), Cates (personal communication, 1983), Corey (personal communication, 1984), Guinan (personal communication, 1984), Johnson (personal communication, 1983), Nahmias (personal communication, 1984), and Whitley (personal communication, 1984); and on the specific references cited. The Morbidity Categories referred to below are defined in Chapter 4 and Table I.9.

Page
281
Front Matter (R1-R14)
1. Summary (1-16)
2. Priority Setting for Health Related Investments: A Review of Methods (17-27)
3. Overview of the Analytic Approach (28-38)
4. Comparison of Disease Burdens and Costs (39-58)
5. Predictions on Vaccine Development (59-66)
6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines (67-91)
7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines (92-120)
8. Additional Issues in the Selection of Priorities for Accelerated Vaccine Development (121-126)
9. Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (127-148)
Appendix A: Some Examples of the Application of Project Selection Method (149-152)
Appendix B: Pathogenic Agents for Which Accelerated Vaccine Development Does Not Appear Appropriate (153-170)
Appendix C: Prospects for Immunizing Against Bordetella pertussis (171-182)
Appendix D: Prospects for Immunizing Against Coccidioidomycosis (183-197)
Appendix E: Prospects for Immunizing Against Cytomegalovirus (198-234)
Appendix F: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae type b (235-251)
Appendix G: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis A Virus (252-260)
Appendix H: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis B Virus (261-279)
Appendix I: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpes Simplex Viruses 1 and 2 (280-312)
Appendix J: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpesvirus varicellae (313-341)
Appendix K: Prospects for Immunizing Against Influenza Viruses A and B (342-364)
Appendix L: Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (365-384)
Appendix M: Prospects for Immunizing Against Parainfluenza Viruses (385-396)
Appendix N: Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (397-409)
Appendix O: Prospects for Immunizing Against Rotavirus (410-423)
Appendix P: Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus group B (424-439)
Appendix Q: Questionnaire for Assessing Morbidity-Mortality Trade-Offs (440-443)
Appendix R: Technical Notes (444-444)
Appendix S: Biographical Notes on Committee Members (445-449)
Appendix T: Additional Sources of Advice to the Committee (450-452)
Index (453-458)