National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States (1985)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix L: Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria gonorrhoeae." New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1985.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
372
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Vaccine Development Establishing Priorities, Volume I: Diseases of Importance in the United States

TABLE L.3 Clinically Apparent Cases of Gonorrhea by Age and Sex

Sex

Infections

Percentage of Symptomatic Cases

Number of Symptomatic Cases

5–14 Years

15–24 Years

Males

1,100,000

95

1,045,000

5,225

571,615

Females

900,000

50

450,000

9,000

331,200

Total

2,000,000

 

1,495,000

14,225

902,815

Calculation of Comparative Total Disease Burden Values

The method used in this study to compare morbidity and mortality resulting from various diseases is described and illustrated in Chapter 4. Total disease burden values (TDBVs) for N. gonorrhoeae are calculated using estimates from Table L.4 and infant mortality equivalence values based on a median of committee member perspectives or on an age-neutral perspective. TDBVs thus obtained are 534 (committee median perspective) and 13,814 (age-neutral perspective). The large difference between these two values arises from the use in the age-neutral perspective of an IME value that equates first-trimester fetal deaths (in ectopic pregnancies) with all other deaths. If the IME value for these deaths were changed to 100 (as it is in the committee median perspective), the age-neutral TDBV would become 350.

Target Population

Identification of the target population for a gonococcal vaccine is complicated somewhat by lack of knowledge about the length of protective immunity that could be conferred by any specific vaccine. The most reasonable approach is to assume that the vaccine should be administered as shortly as possible before the age at which the incidence of disease begins to rise—sometime in the late teens. For this report, the target population at steady-state utilization is considered to be all 15-year-old teenagers. (immediately after introduction of an effective vaccine, older individuals probably would receive the vaccine as well.)

Disease incidence rates among military personnel are greater than those for civilians. Thus, this group or others, such as individuals presenting at clinics with sexually transmitted diseases, could be considered as potential high-risk target populations for vaccination.

Suitability for Vaccine Control

Despite the availability of antibiotics, gonorrhea inflicts a considerable burden of illness. In women, its occurrence may not be recognized until after the onset of a pattern of chronic complications.

Page
372
Front Matter (R1-R14)
1. Summary (1-16)
2. Priority Setting for Health Related Investments: A Review of Methods (17-27)
3. Overview of the Analytic Approach (28-38)
4. Comparison of Disease Burdens and Costs (39-58)
5. Predictions on Vaccine Development (59-66)
6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines (67-91)
7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines (92-120)
8. Additional Issues in the Selection of Priorities for Accelerated Vaccine Development (121-126)
9. Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (127-148)
Appendix A: Some Examples of the Application of Project Selection Method (149-152)
Appendix B: Pathogenic Agents for Which Accelerated Vaccine Development Does Not Appear Appropriate (153-170)
Appendix C: Prospects for Immunizing Against Bordetella pertussis (171-182)
Appendix D: Prospects for Immunizing Against Coccidioidomycosis (183-197)
Appendix E: Prospects for Immunizing Against Cytomegalovirus (198-234)
Appendix F: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae type b (235-251)
Appendix G: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis A Virus (252-260)
Appendix H: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis B Virus (261-279)
Appendix I: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpes Simplex Viruses 1 and 2 (280-312)
Appendix J: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpesvirus varicellae (313-341)
Appendix K: Prospects for Immunizing Against Influenza Viruses A and B (342-364)
Appendix L: Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (365-384)
Appendix M: Prospects for Immunizing Against Parainfluenza Viruses (385-396)
Appendix N: Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (397-409)
Appendix O: Prospects for Immunizing Against Rotavirus (410-423)
Appendix P: Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus group B (424-439)
Appendix Q: Questionnaire for Assessing Morbidity-Mortality Trade-Offs (440-443)
Appendix R: Technical Notes (444-444)
Appendix S: Biographical Notes on Committee Members (445-449)
Appendix T: Additional Sources of Advice to the Committee (450-452)
Index (453-458)