National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States (1985)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix L: Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria gonorrhoeae." New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1985.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
374
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Vaccine Development Establishing Priorities, Volume I: Diseases of Importance in the United States

A preventive approach is thus desirable; it also appears to be practicable because an opportunity exists to deliver a vaccine prior to the period of maximum exposure. The growing problem of antibiotic resistant organisms would be obviated by a vaccine.

Success of a vaccination prevention approach is dependent upon development of a suitably protective vaccine. It also may require efforts to change misconceptions about the risk and consequences of the disease, particularly among lay persons.

Vaccine Preventable Illness

Defining the target population is the first step in calculating the possible reduction in morbidity and mortality that could be produced by a vaccine candidate. This knowledge can be translated into an estimate for vaccine preventable illness (VPI). VPI is defined as the number of cases, complications, sequelae, and deaths that could be prevented by immunization of the entire target population with a hypothetical vaccine that is 100 percent effective.

In calculating the benefits that could result from a gonococcal vaccine, it is assumed that all disease occurring over 15 years of age and all fetal deaths due to ectopic pregnancy are potentially vaccine preventable. None of the disease occurring in the 5–14 years age group is considered vaccine preventable, because children under 15 years of age are not included in the target population. Table L.5 presents a summary of VPI for gonorrhea.

Vaccine Preventable Illness Values

The concept of “infant mortality equivalence value” is used to standardize vaccine preventable illness scores, just as it is used to standardize disease burden values (see Chapter 4). Vaccine preventable illness values for gonorrhea are calculated using estimates from Table L.5 and the two sets of IME values employed throughout this report. Using IME values based on a median of committee member perspectives, the vaccine preventable illness value for gonorrhea is 527; with the age-neutral perspective the value is 13,811. If the IME value for first trimester fetal deaths in the age-neutral perspective were changed from 1 to 100 (as it is in the committee median perspective), the age-neutral VPI value would become 347.

Possible Reduction in Morbidity and Mortality (PRMM)

Calculation of the possible reduction in morbidity and mortality (or maximum potential health benefit) that could be achieved with a gonorrhea vaccine is somewhat different than the operation as performed for other vaccines, because in this case the candidate is “one of several promising options” rather than a specific vaccine. The committee believes, however, that a gonorrhea vaccine could achieve licensure

Page
374
Front Matter (R1-R14)
1. Summary (1-16)
2. Priority Setting for Health Related Investments: A Review of Methods (17-27)
3. Overview of the Analytic Approach (28-38)
4. Comparison of Disease Burdens and Costs (39-58)
5. Predictions on Vaccine Development (59-66)
6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines (67-91)
7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines (92-120)
8. Additional Issues in the Selection of Priorities for Accelerated Vaccine Development (121-126)
9. Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (127-148)
Appendix A: Some Examples of the Application of Project Selection Method (149-152)
Appendix B: Pathogenic Agents for Which Accelerated Vaccine Development Does Not Appear Appropriate (153-170)
Appendix C: Prospects for Immunizing Against Bordetella pertussis (171-182)
Appendix D: Prospects for Immunizing Against Coccidioidomycosis (183-197)
Appendix E: Prospects for Immunizing Against Cytomegalovirus (198-234)
Appendix F: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae type b (235-251)
Appendix G: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis A Virus (252-260)
Appendix H: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis B Virus (261-279)
Appendix I: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpes Simplex Viruses 1 and 2 (280-312)
Appendix J: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpesvirus varicellae (313-341)
Appendix K: Prospects for Immunizing Against Influenza Viruses A and B (342-364)
Appendix L: Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (365-384)
Appendix M: Prospects for Immunizing Against Parainfluenza Viruses (385-396)
Appendix N: Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (397-409)
Appendix O: Prospects for Immunizing Against Rotavirus (410-423)
Appendix P: Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus group B (424-439)
Appendix Q: Questionnaire for Assessing Morbidity-Mortality Trade-Offs (440-443)
Appendix R: Technical Notes (444-444)
Appendix S: Biographical Notes on Committee Members (445-449)
Appendix T: Additional Sources of Advice to the Committee (450-452)
Index (453-458)