National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States (1985)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix N: Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus." New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1985.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
404
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Vaccine Development Establishing Priorities, Volume I: Diseases of Importance in the United States

needed to understand the response of the immune system to administration of such antigens by various routes.

Current Vaccine Development

Recent vaccine development has focused primarily on two areas: live vaccines administered parenterally and live attenuated vaccines administered in the respiratory tract. A vaccine grown in tissue culture and designed for subcutaneous administration was recently tested in a large number of young children (Belshe et al., 1982). This vaccine failed to protect, although it weakly stimulated antibody to RSV.

Attenuated vaccines administered in the respiratory tract have been examined more extensively. The most promising candidates have been members of the temperature-sensitive mutant group developed by Chanock and his associates at the National Institutes of Health (Gharpure et al., 1969). The ts-1 vaccine, while considerably less pathogenic than earlier strains, still induced symptomatic illness, including otitis media and mild bronchitis, in unprimed infants. Attempts have been made to further mutagenize this strain and also to test the more attenuated ts-2 mutant. These attempts have not yet been successful.

The prospects for developing vaccines from genetically engineered live strains also are reasonably promising. Most of the genome of RSV has been sequenced, as noted above.

Clinical Trials

The major problem anticipated in clinical trials of RSV vaccines stems from the necessity to examine infants in the first year of life. Live attenuated vaccines that are of sufficiently low pathogenicity to be safe in this group are likely to be poorly infectious in partially immune adult or older pediatric patients. Subunit vaccines administered to the respiratory mucosa may be easier to test, but they hold the definite, albeit small, risk of producing severe atypical disease on subsequent exposure to wild virus. However, as knowledge of the natural illness and natural immunity grows, the likelihood of repeating the experience with the killed parenteral vaccine diminishes.

Other difficulties to be encountered involve the problems of growing this virus in large quantities and also of purifying it or its proteins. RSV tends to grow only to modest titers in tissue culture, and it has been difficult to purify the whole virus or its glycoproteins.

Page
404
Front Matter (R1-R14)
1. Summary (1-16)
2. Priority Setting for Health Related Investments: A Review of Methods (17-27)
3. Overview of the Analytic Approach (28-38)
4. Comparison of Disease Burdens and Costs (39-58)
5. Predictions on Vaccine Development (59-66)
6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines (67-91)
7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines (92-120)
8. Additional Issues in the Selection of Priorities for Accelerated Vaccine Development (121-126)
9. Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (127-148)
Appendix A: Some Examples of the Application of Project Selection Method (149-152)
Appendix B: Pathogenic Agents for Which Accelerated Vaccine Development Does Not Appear Appropriate (153-170)
Appendix C: Prospects for Immunizing Against Bordetella pertussis (171-182)
Appendix D: Prospects for Immunizing Against Coccidioidomycosis (183-197)
Appendix E: Prospects for Immunizing Against Cytomegalovirus (198-234)
Appendix F: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae type b (235-251)
Appendix G: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis A Virus (252-260)
Appendix H: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis B Virus (261-279)
Appendix I: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpes Simplex Viruses 1 and 2 (280-312)
Appendix J: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpesvirus varicellae (313-341)
Appendix K: Prospects for Immunizing Against Influenza Viruses A and B (342-364)
Appendix L: Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (365-384)
Appendix M: Prospects for Immunizing Against Parainfluenza Viruses (385-396)
Appendix N: Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (397-409)
Appendix O: Prospects for Immunizing Against Rotavirus (410-423)
Appendix P: Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus group B (424-439)
Appendix Q: Questionnaire for Assessing Morbidity-Mortality Trade-Offs (440-443)
Appendix R: Technical Notes (444-444)
Appendix S: Biographical Notes on Committee Members (445-449)
Appendix T: Additional Sources of Advice to the Committee (450-452)
Index (453-458)