National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States (1985)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix P: Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus group B." New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1985.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
429
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Vaccine Development Establishing Priorities, Volume I: Diseases of Importance in the United States

TABLE P.3 Maternal GBS Infections

 

Vaginal Deliveries

Caesarean Sections

Total number (%) of deliveries estimated for 1984

3,182,203

(84%)

606,134

(16%)

Number of cases of endometritis/ parametritis

127,288a

 

96,981b

 

Number caused by GBS (20%)

25,458

 

19,396

 

Number of cases of bacteremia

 

 

15,153c

 

Number caused by GBS (20%)

 

 

3,031

 

aEstimated to be 4 percent of vaginal deliveries.

bEstimated to be 16 percent of caesarean sections.

cEstimated to be 2 to 3 percent of caesarean sections.

Vaccine Target Population

The target population for protection is the newborn infant. The target population for active immunization would be pregnant women, although immunization might take place prior to pregnancy. Conjugation of the polysaccharide antigen with a protein carrier might increase the antigenicity of a streptococcus group B vaccine. The native polysaccharide antigens already have been shown to be immunogenic in nonpregnant adults. The incidence of reactions is relatively low, less than that associated with the pneumococcal vaccine, in addition, Hemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide vaccine has been used in pregnant women without significant complications (Hill, 1983). However, a foreseeable problem in vaccinating such a target population would be the usual hesitancy to expose pregnant women to exogenous substances.

Suitability for Vaccine Control

Theoretically, a program of active immunization aimed at pregnant women would have the best prospects of controlling early-onset and late-onset GBS disease. Successful vaccine control by this approach, will require elicitation of antibodies capable of crossing the placenta to protect the fetus. Alternative strategies include passive immunization of the newborn, which would not prevent early-onset disease that develops in utero, and various forms of chemoprophylaxis, which would be unlikely to prevent late-onset disease (Fischer et al., 1983). Chemoprophylaxis has been studied during pregnancy, labor, and the

Page
429
Front Matter (R1-R14)
1. Summary (1-16)
2. Priority Setting for Health Related Investments: A Review of Methods (17-27)
3. Overview of the Analytic Approach (28-38)
4. Comparison of Disease Burdens and Costs (39-58)
5. Predictions on Vaccine Development (59-66)
6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines (67-91)
7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines (92-120)
8. Additional Issues in the Selection of Priorities for Accelerated Vaccine Development (121-126)
9. Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (127-148)
Appendix A: Some Examples of the Application of Project Selection Method (149-152)
Appendix B: Pathogenic Agents for Which Accelerated Vaccine Development Does Not Appear Appropriate (153-170)
Appendix C: Prospects for Immunizing Against Bordetella pertussis (171-182)
Appendix D: Prospects for Immunizing Against Coccidioidomycosis (183-197)
Appendix E: Prospects for Immunizing Against Cytomegalovirus (198-234)
Appendix F: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae type b (235-251)
Appendix G: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis A Virus (252-260)
Appendix H: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis B Virus (261-279)
Appendix I: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpes Simplex Viruses 1 and 2 (280-312)
Appendix J: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpesvirus varicellae (313-341)
Appendix K: Prospects for Immunizing Against Influenza Viruses A and B (342-364)
Appendix L: Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (365-384)
Appendix M: Prospects for Immunizing Against Parainfluenza Viruses (385-396)
Appendix N: Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (397-409)
Appendix O: Prospects for Immunizing Against Rotavirus (410-423)
Appendix P: Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus group B (424-439)
Appendix Q: Questionnaire for Assessing Morbidity-Mortality Trade-Offs (440-443)
Appendix R: Technical Notes (444-444)
Appendix S: Biographical Notes on Committee Members (445-449)
Appendix T: Additional Sources of Advice to the Committee (450-452)
Index (453-458)