National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States (1985)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines." New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1985.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
86
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Vaccine Development Establishing Priorities, Volume I: Diseases of Importance in the United States

The logistic formulation ensures that the use rate will fall between 0.0 and 1.0 (i.e., between 0 and 100 percent).

The scores for pneumococcal, influenza, and pertussis vaccines and their voluntary use rates were used to obtain the following regression equations:

Case A (additive/additive combination)

Case B (additive/multiplicative combination)

Case C (multiplicative/additive combination)

Case D (multiplicative/ multiplicative combination)

The anticipated use rate for each new vaccine was obtained by substituting its score (Table 6.4) into the appropriate regression equation, and solving for the use rate, p. The results are shown in Table 6.7.

Alternatives to the HBM Approach for Predicting Anticipated Use Rates for New Vaccines

The possibility of deriving anticipated use rates for new vaccines by adjusting the observed use rate of an existing comparable vaccine was evaluated. For example, the current use rate for MMR or DPT could be adjusted and applied to new pediatric vaccines. This approach was considered less satisfactory than the HBM for several reasons. Factors considered in adjusting the observed rate and their weights would be identified less explicitly, making assessment of changes in them more difficult. In addition, for certain new vaccines appropriate comparable vaccines do not exist. Although this approach was not adopted, it could be used to double check the calculated HBM anticipated use rates of selected new vaccines that do resemble existing vaccines.

Limitations of the Approach

Application of the system to recently developed vaccines, such as the mumps vaccine, may reveal possible limitations of the model as a predictive tool. For example, unexpected controversy may depress use rates, while unforeseeable events (e.g., the opportunity to combine the mumps vaccine with measles/rubella vaccine) may increase them.

Page
86
Front Matter (R1-R14)
1. Summary (1-16)
2. Priority Setting for Health Related Investments: A Review of Methods (17-27)
3. Overview of the Analytic Approach (28-38)
4. Comparison of Disease Burdens and Costs (39-58)
5. Predictions on Vaccine Development (59-66)
6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines (67-91)
7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines (92-120)
8. Additional Issues in the Selection of Priorities for Accelerated Vaccine Development (121-126)
9. Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (127-148)
Appendix A: Some Examples of the Application of Project Selection Method (149-152)
Appendix B: Pathogenic Agents for Which Accelerated Vaccine Development Does Not Appear Appropriate (153-170)
Appendix C: Prospects for Immunizing Against Bordetella pertussis (171-182)
Appendix D: Prospects for Immunizing Against Coccidioidomycosis (183-197)
Appendix E: Prospects for Immunizing Against Cytomegalovirus (198-234)
Appendix F: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae type b (235-251)
Appendix G: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis A Virus (252-260)
Appendix H: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis B Virus (261-279)
Appendix I: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpes Simplex Viruses 1 and 2 (280-312)
Appendix J: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpesvirus varicellae (313-341)
Appendix K: Prospects for Immunizing Against Influenza Viruses A and B (342-364)
Appendix L: Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (365-384)
Appendix M: Prospects for Immunizing Against Parainfluenza Viruses (385-396)
Appendix N: Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (397-409)
Appendix O: Prospects for Immunizing Against Rotavirus (410-423)
Appendix P: Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus group B (424-439)
Appendix Q: Questionnaire for Assessing Morbidity-Mortality Trade-Offs (440-443)
Appendix R: Technical Notes (444-444)
Appendix S: Biographical Notes on Committee Members (445-449)
Appendix T: Additional Sources of Advice to the Committee (450-452)
Index (453-458)