National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States (1985)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines." New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume I, Diseases of Importance in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1985.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
96
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Vaccine Development Establishing Priorities, Volume I: Diseases of Importance in the United States

Target Population

Target populations for the vaccines are described in the relevant appendixes and briefly outlined in Table 5.1. The number of new potential vaccine recipients entering the target population each year must be determined to calculate the number of adverse effects and the costs associated with each vaccination program. These calculations are based on the envisaged target population and the 1984 population projections (Bureau of the Census, 1984). Background information used to determine the number of new potential recipients of each vaccine is shown in Table 7.1.

Vaccine Preventable Illness

For each disease, estimates of vaccine preventable illness are derived from an examination of the distribution of the disease burden; the envisaged target population; the characteristics of the vaccine (e.g., the number of doses); the likely age of vaccine delivery; and for some diseases (e.g., hepatitis B and influenza), the proportion of the disease falling in the identified high-risk group.

Estimates of vaccine preventable illness for each disease are discussed and included in Appendixes C through P. These estimates, based on steady-state utilization, are derived from disease burden estimates judged to reasonably represent 1984 levels (see Chapter 4 and below).

Trends in Disease Burden and Population Numbers

Calculations of morbidity, mortality, and costs assume that the effects of trends in disease burden and population size (between 1984 and the achievement of steady-state benefits) would not be of sufficient magnitude to obscure differences between diseases. The effects of such trends could be examined, if desired, within the model proposed. These assumptions apply only to diseases under study and the current population projections: if other disease candidates are added to the list, the assumptions should be re-examined. Because of the trend towards greater numbers of individuals in the 25–59 years and 60 years and over age groups, the major effect of adopting these assumptions would be to somewhat underestimate the benefits of vaccines reducing disease in these age groups, assuming incidence rates remain constant.

Adverse Reactions

The maximum number of adverse reactions is calculated from the predicted incidence of adverse reactions (Table 5.1), assuming delivery of the required number of doses to the annual number of new potential vaccinees (Table 7.1). IME values appropriate for the conditions

Page
96
Front Matter (R1-R14)
1. Summary (1-16)
2. Priority Setting for Health Related Investments: A Review of Methods (17-27)
3. Overview of the Analytic Approach (28-38)
4. Comparison of Disease Burdens and Costs (39-58)
5. Predictions on Vaccine Development (59-66)
6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines (67-91)
7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines (92-120)
8. Additional Issues in the Selection of Priorities for Accelerated Vaccine Development (121-126)
9. Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (127-148)
Appendix A: Some Examples of the Application of Project Selection Method (149-152)
Appendix B: Pathogenic Agents for Which Accelerated Vaccine Development Does Not Appear Appropriate (153-170)
Appendix C: Prospects for Immunizing Against Bordetella pertussis (171-182)
Appendix D: Prospects for Immunizing Against Coccidioidomycosis (183-197)
Appendix E: Prospects for Immunizing Against Cytomegalovirus (198-234)
Appendix F: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae type b (235-251)
Appendix G: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis A Virus (252-260)
Appendix H: Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis B Virus (261-279)
Appendix I: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpes Simplex Viruses 1 and 2 (280-312)
Appendix J: Prospects for Immunizing Against Herpesvirus varicellae (313-341)
Appendix K: Prospects for Immunizing Against Influenza Viruses A and B (342-364)
Appendix L: Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (365-384)
Appendix M: Prospects for Immunizing Against Parainfluenza Viruses (385-396)
Appendix N: Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (397-409)
Appendix O: Prospects for Immunizing Against Rotavirus (410-423)
Appendix P: Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus group B (424-439)
Appendix Q: Questionnaire for Assessing Morbidity-Mortality Trade-Offs (440-443)
Appendix R: Technical Notes (444-444)
Appendix S: Biographical Notes on Committee Members (445-449)
Appendix T: Additional Sources of Advice to the Committee (450-452)
Index (453-458)