National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$47.75
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Surveying Victims: Options for Conducting the National Crime Victimization Survey (2008)
Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)
Committee on Law and Justice (CLAJ)

Citation Manager

. "References." Surveying Victims: Options for Conducting the National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
128
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Surveying Victims: Options for Conducting the National Crime Victimization Survey

Bates, N. (2006, December 29). Noninterview rates for selected major demographic household surveys, 1990–2005. Internal memorandum, Demographic Surveys Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Baum, K. (2007, November). National Crime Victimization Survey: Identity Theft, 2005. NCJ 219411. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Baum, K. and P. Klaus (2005, January). National Crime Victimization Survey: Violent Victimization of College Students, 1995–2002. NCJ 206836. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Baumer, E. P. (2002). Neighborhood disadvantage and police notification by victims of violence. Criminology 40(3), 579–616.

Baumer, E. P., J. Horney, R. B. Felson, and J. L. Lauritsen (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage and the nature of violence. Criminology 41(1), 39–71.

Belli, R. F. (1998). The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory 6(4), 383–406.

Belli, R. F., W. L. Shay, and F. P. Stafford (2001). Event history calendars and question list surveys: A direct comparison of interviewing methods. Public Opinion Quarterly 65, 45–74.

Belli, R. F., L. M. Smith, P. M. Andreski, and S. Agrawal (2007). Methodological comparisons between CATI event history calendar and standardized conventional questionnaire instruments. Public Opinion Quarterly 71(4), 603–622.

Bensley, L., M. S., J. Van Eenwyk, K. Wynkoop Simmons, and D. Ruggles (2000, July 7). Prevalence of intimate partner violence and injuries—Washington, 1998. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports 49(26), 589–592.

Biderman, A. D. and D. Cantor (1984). A longitudinal analysis of bounding respondent conditioning and mobility as sources of panel bias in the National Crime Survey. In Proceedings of the Survey Methods Research Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

Biderman, A. D., D. Cantor, J. P. Lynch, and E. Martin (1986). Final Report of Research and Development for the Redesign of the National Crime Survey. Prepared for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: Bureau of Social Science Research, Inc.

Biderman, A. D., D. Cantor, and A. Reiss (1985). A quasi-experimental analysis of personal victimization by household respondents in the NCS. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Statistical Association, Philadelphia.

Biderman, A. D. and A. J. Reiss (1967, November). On exploring the “dark figure” of crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 374, 1–15.

Page
128