TABLE 3.A.1 Sources and Key Assumptions Used to Develop Cost and Energy Supply Estimates in This Report
|
|
Fossil-Fuel Energy (Chapter 7)
|
Nuclear Energy (Chapter 8)
|
Renewable Energy (Chapter 6)
|
|
Reference scenario
|
EIA (2008)
|
EIA (2008)
|
EIA (2009)
|
|
COST ESTIMATES: SOURCES AND KEY ASSUMPTIONS
|
|
Source of cost estimates
|
Committee-derived model estimates
|
Committee-derived model estimates
|
Critical assessment of the literaturea
|
|
Models used to obtain estimates
|
NETL (2007) and Princeton Environmental Instituteb
|
|
-
NEMS model for EIA (2009) cost estimates
-
MERGE model for EPRI (2007) cost estimates
-
Other literature estimates are not model based
|
|
Cost estimate limitations
|
-
IGCC, USPC, and CCS technologies are not yet mature and have not been deployed
-
Geologic storage of CO2 has not been demonstrated on a commercial scale
|
Evolutionary nuclear technologies are mature but plants have not yet been deployed in the United States.
|
Solar technologies are undergoing rapid technological improvements that could bring down future costs.
|
|
Plant maturity
|
-
Nth plant for pulverized coal
-
3 percent premium on capital costs added for IGCC, PC-CCS, and IGCC-CCS to account for immaturity of technologies
-
20 percent premium on CCS capital costs added for CCS 2020 estimates to account for immaturity of technologies
|
Nth plant
|
Nth plant
|
|
Plant size
|
500 MW (coal and gas)
|
1.35 GW, based on weighted average of current plant license applications
|
Variable
|