National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$69.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

America's Energy Future: Technology and Transformation (2009)
National Academy of Engineering (NAE)
National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
National Research Council (NRC)

Citation Manager

. "7 Fossil-Fuel Energy." America's Energy Future: Technology and Transformation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
422
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Amreica’s Enery Future: Technology and Transformation

An overview of these capture strategies is shown in Figure 7.A.1. All three are available, in principle, for all hydrocarbon sources, but relative costs differ, as do the energy-conversion routes that are favored. Gasification is probably the most competitive for high-rank coals, but this may reflect the lack of investment thus far in the development of gasifiers for low-rank coals. Petcoke is similar to a high-rank coal. Biomass may be co-fired with coal or petcoke, but to gasify a combination in which biomass represents a significant fraction of the total thermal input, there may need to be a separate biomass gasifier with its own feed-handling strategies.

CO2 capture from natural-gas-fired power plants can be accomplished using any of the three strategies. One proposed project design features autothermal reforming of natural gas to make hydrogen, with combustion of the hydrogen

FIGURE 7.A.1 Options for capture of CO2 from flue-gas and process streams.

FIGURE 7.A.1 Options for capture of CO2 from flue-gas and process streams.

Source: IPCC, 2005.

Page
422