Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

PAPERBACK price:$35.00 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources PDF SUMMARY Display this book on your site! Related Titles Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment The Measure of STAR:Review of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Research Grants Program Other Related Titles Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008) Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager . "Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency." Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008. Please select a format: Page 1   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Page 1 Front Matter (R1-R20) Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1-2) Summary (3-10) 1 Introduction: The Government Performance and Results Act, the Program Assessment Rating Tool, and the Environmental Protection Agency (11-20) 2 Efficiency Metrics Used by the Environmental Protection Agency and Other Federal Research and Development Programs (21-37) 3 Are the Efficiency Metrics Used by Federal Research and Development Programs Sufficient and Outcome-Based? (38-51) 4 A Model for Evaluating Research and Development Programs (52-57) 5 Findings, Principles, and Recommendations (58-68) Appendix A: Biographic Information on the Committee on Evaluating the Efficiency of Research and Development Programs at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (69-74) Appendix B: Evaluating the Efficiency of Research and Development Programs at the Environmental Protection Agency: Workshop Summary (75-85) Appendix C: Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Questions (86-89) Appendix D: The Environmental Protection Agency's Strategic and Multi-year Planning Process (90-94) Appendix E: Agency and Industry Efficiency Measures (95-108) Appendix F: Draft Board of Scientific Counselors Handbook for Subcommittee Chairs: Draft Proposed Charge Questions for BOSC Reviews (109-112) Appendix G: OMB's Research and Development Program Investment Criteria (113-118) Appendix H: Charge to the BOSC Subcommittee on Safe Pesticides/Safe Products Research (119-127) Appendix I: PART Guidance on Efficiency Measures (128-132)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 1
Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

OCR for page 2
Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency This page intentionally left blank.