National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$35.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008)
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix C: Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Questions." Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
89
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

3.CR2: Do the program’s credit models adequately provide reliable, consistent, accurate and transparent estimates of costs and the risk to the Government? (Credit)

3.RD1: For R&D programs other than competitive grants programs, does the program allocate funds and use management processes that maintain program quality? (R&D)

Section IV.
Program Results/Accountability

4.1: Has the program demonstrated adequate progress in achieving its long-term performance goals?

4.2: Does the program (including program partners) achieve its annual performance goals?

4.3: Does the program demonstrate improved efficiencies or cost effectiveness in achieving program goals each year?

4.4: Does the performance of this program compare favorably to other programs, including government, private, etc., with similar purpose and goals?

4.5: Do independent evaluations of sufficient scope and quality indicate that the program is effective and achieving results?

Specific Results Questions by Program Type

4.RG1: Were programmatic goals (and benefits) achieved at the least incremental societal cost and did the program maximize net benefits? (Regulatory)

4.CA1: Were program goals achieved within budgeted costs and established schedules? (Capital Assets and Service Acquisition)

Page
89
Front Matter (R1-R20)
Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1-2)
Summary (3-10)
1 Introduction: The Government Performance and Results Act, the Program Assessment Rating Tool, and the Environmental Protection Agency (11-20)
2 Efficiency Metrics Used by the Environmental Protection Agency and Other Federal Research and Development Programs (21-37)
3 Are the Efficiency Metrics Used by Federal Research and Development Programs Sufficient and Outcome-Based? (38-51)
4 A Model for Evaluating Research and Development Programs (52-57)
5 Findings, Principles, and Recommendations (58-68)
Appendix A: Biographic Information on the Committee on Evaluating the Efficiency of Research and Development Programs at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (69-74)
Appendix B: Evaluating the Efficiency of Research and Development Programs at the Environmental Protection Agency: Workshop Summary (75-85)
Appendix C: Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Questions (86-89)
Appendix D: The Environmental Protection Agency's Strategic and Multi-year Planning Process (90-94)
Appendix E: Agency and Industry Efficiency Measures (95-108)
Appendix F: Draft Board of Scientific Counselors Handbook for Subcommittee Chairs: Draft Proposed Charge Questions for BOSC Reviews (109-112)
Appendix G: OMB's Research and Development Program Investment Criteria (113-118)
Appendix H: Charge to the BOSC Subcommittee on Safe Pesticides/Safe Products Research (119-127)
Appendix I: PART Guidance on Efficiency Measures (128-132)