National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$35.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008)
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix D: The Environmental Protection Agency's Strategic and Multi-year Planning Process." Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
94
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

The research plan questions for the air-toxics subobjective are as follows (EPA 2002):

  1. What are the sources of air toxics, and what are their characteristics?

  2. What is the role of atmospheric transport, transformation, fate, and chemistry in air toxics concentrations (including indoor, micro-scale, urban, terrestrial, and regional concentrations)?

  3. What is the relationship of concentrations of air toxics (from outdoor and indoor sources) to personal exposure?

  4. What are the health hazards and dose-response relationships associated with exposure to air toxics?

  5. What improvements can be made to dose-response assessments?

  6. What health risks can be characterized quantitatively for people exposed to air toxics?

  7. What risks from air toxics can be prevented and managed cost effectively?

A general subset of research activities arising from those questions consists of developing measurements, databases, methods, and biomarkers; validating models; identifying chemical mechanisms; and evaluating exposure concentrations.

REFERENCES

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. Air Toxics Research Strategy. EPA-600-R-00-056. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ord/htm/documents/Air_Toxics.pdf [accessed Nov. 14, 2007].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003a. 2003-2008 Strategic Plan: Direction for the Future. EPA-190-R-03-003. Office of Chief Planning Officer, Office of Planning Analysis and Accountability, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/epainnov/pdf/innovplan.pdf [accessed Nov 14, 2007].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003b. Air Toxics Multi-Year Plan. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/osp/myp/airtox.pdf [accessed Nov. 14, 2007].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006. 2006-2011 Strategic Plan: Charting Our Course. EPA-190-R-06-001. Office of Chief Planning Officer, Office of Planning Analysis and Accountability, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/cfo/plan/2006/entire_report.pdf [accessed Nov. 14, 2007].

Page
94
Front Matter (R1-R20)
Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1-2)
Summary (3-10)
1 Introduction: The Government Performance and Results Act, the Program Assessment Rating Tool, and the Environmental Protection Agency (11-20)
2 Efficiency Metrics Used by the Environmental Protection Agency and Other Federal Research and Development Programs (21-37)
3 Are the Efficiency Metrics Used by Federal Research and Development Programs Sufficient and Outcome-Based? (38-51)
4 A Model for Evaluating Research and Development Programs (52-57)
5 Findings, Principles, and Recommendations (58-68)
Appendix A: Biographic Information on the Committee on Evaluating the Efficiency of Research and Development Programs at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (69-74)
Appendix B: Evaluating the Efficiency of Research and Development Programs at the Environmental Protection Agency: Workshop Summary (75-85)
Appendix C: Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Questions (86-89)
Appendix D: The Environmental Protection Agency's Strategic and Multi-year Planning Process (90-94)
Appendix E: Agency and Industry Efficiency Measures (95-108)
Appendix F: Draft Board of Scientific Counselors Handbook for Subcommittee Chairs: Draft Proposed Charge Questions for BOSC Reviews (109-112)
Appendix G: OMB's Research and Development Program Investment Criteria (113-118)
Appendix H: Charge to the BOSC Subcommittee on Safe Pesticides/Safe Products Research (119-127)
Appendix I: PART Guidance on Efficiency Measures (128-132)