with experience in actually managing DG programs remained skeptical as to whether the complexity and dynamic nature of DG programming would allow random assignment evaluation designs to be implemented successfully. The committee also notes that doing random assignment evaluations in the highly politicized field of democracy assistance will likely be controversial. It is, therefore, recommended in Chapter 9, as part of a broader effort to improve evaluations and learning regarding DG programs at USAID, that USAID begin with a limited but high-visibility initiative to provide a test of the feasibility and value of applying impact evaluation methods to a select number of its DG projects.


Carrión, J.F., Zárate, P., and Seligson, M.A. 2007. The Political Culture of Democracy in Peru: 2006. Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP), Vanderbilt University and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima, Peru. Available at http://stemason. vanderbilt.edu/files/gcfLNu/Peru_English_DIMS%202006with20corrections20v5,pdf. Accessed on April 26, 2008.

Dehn, J., and Svensson, J. 2003. Survey Tools for Assessing Performance in Service Delivery. Working Paper. Development Research Group, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

GRADE. 2003. Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo, Linea de Base Rapida: Gobiernos Subnacionales e Indicadores de Desarrollo. Lima, Peru: GRADE.

Gugerty, M.K., and Kremer, M. 2006. Outside Funding and the Dynamics of Participation in Community Associations. Background Papers. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPA/Resources/Training-Materials/OutsideFunding.pdf. Accessed on April 26, 2008

Miguel, E., and Kremer, M. 2004. Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities. Econometrica 72(1):159-217.

Olken, B.A. 2007. Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy 115:200-249.

PRODES PMP. 2006. Pro Decentralization Performance Monitoring Plan, 2003-2006. Lima, Peru: ARD, Inc.

PRODES PMP. 2007. Pro Decentralization Performance Monitoring Plan, Fifth Year Option, February 2007-February 2008. Lima, Peru: ARD, Inc.

Savedoff, W.D., Levine, R., and Birdsall, N. 2006. When Will We Ever Learn? Improving Lives Through Impact Evaluation. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

Seligson, M. 2006. The AmericasBarometer, 2006: Background to the Study. Available at: http://sitemason.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/americasbarometer2006eng. Accessed on February 23, 2008.

USAID/Peru. 2002. Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 527-P-02-019, Strengthening of The Decentralization Process and Selected Sub-National Governments in Peru (“the Pro-Decentralization Program”). Lima, Peru: USAID/Peru.

USAID/Uganda. 2007a. Request for Proposals (RFP): Strengthening Democratic Linkages in Uganda. Kampala, Uganda: USAID/Uganda.

USAID/Uganda. 2007b. Request for Proposals (RFP): Strengthening Multi-Party Democracy. Kampala, Uganda: USAID/Uganda.

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement