Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Appendix E Reviewers This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC's Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report: PHILIP ADONGO, Navrongo Health Research Centre PATRICK DUFFY, Seattle Biomedical Research Institute STEPHEN L. HOFFMAN, Sanaria Inc. PETER KAZEMBE, Lilongwe Central Hospital MARK KLINE, Texas Childrenâs Hospital RAMANAN LAXMINARAYAN, Resources for the Future MIKE SOTO, Georgetown University ANDY STERGACHIS, University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine CATHERINE M. WILFERT, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by ELENA O. NIGHTINGALE, Scholar- in-Residence, Institute of Medicine, HAROLD C. SOX, Annals of Internal Medicine, and EDWARD B. PERRIN, University of Washington (emeritus). Appointed by the National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine, they were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution. 79
