National Academies Press: OpenBook

Review of NASA's Exploration Technology Development Program: An Interim Report (2008)

Chapter: C Questions Used by the Committee to Gather Data on Each Project

« Previous: B Committee Member Biographies
Suggested Citation:"C Questions Used by the Committee to Gather Data on Each Project." National Research Council. 2008. Review of NASA's Exploration Technology Development Program: An Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12189.
×
Page 57

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

C Questions Used by the Committee to Gather Data on Each Project 1. Status of the technology and the quality of the development effort a. What is the description of the technology? What function does it facilitate (i.e., what does the technology allow the system to do)? b. What is the development status (TRL, etc.)? c. Are there gaps in the technology development effort within the technology area? d. What is the quality of the NASA effort in development, and what are the international benchmarks against which this technology development is compared? e. What is the degree of non-NASA development of the technology, and what is the possibility that non-NASA sources will develop a competing or alternative technology that NASA could use? f. What is the team involved? Does the team have adequate training, experience, and capabilities? Is the team working in a coordinated manner? Could additional members strengthen the team? g. Are appropriate non-NASA entities involved (other national labs, universities, industry)? h. Are facilities identified adequate to mature the technology? i. Are metrics appropriate and in use? 2. Technology development plan a. What is the technology roadmap or plan for development? b. What is the projected date by which the technology will become available (e.g., TRL 6)? How does this compare with the timing of the need? c. What are the risks in meeting that schedule? d. Does the development depend in a critical way on non-NASA outcomes? e. What is the projected cost of development (including testing and verification to allow insertion)? f. Is there a plan to transition the technology and an industrial base equipped to absorb the technology and successfully deploy it into working systems? 3. Impact of the technology and the capacity for transitioning to customers a. Does the technology have architectural benefit (i.e., does it enable new design or operational architectures that deliver significantly improved capability, lower costs, or lower operational risks)? b. Does the technology have a performance benefit (i.e., significantly change the performance, risk, or cost but not differentiate among architectures)? c. Is the technology robust in the face of possible changes to the architecture and extensible to other exploration-class missions, e.g., Mars? d. What is the backup plan for high-risk development efforts? 57

Next: D Definitions for Technology Readiness Levels »
Review of NASA's Exploration Technology Development Program: An Interim Report Get This Book
×
 Review of NASA's Exploration Technology Development Program: An Interim Report
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

To meet the objectives of the Vision for Space Exploration (VSE), NASA must develop a wide array of enabling technologies. For this purpose, NASA established the Exploration Technology Development Program (ETDP). Currently, ETDP has 22 projects underway. In the report accompanying the House-passed version of the FY2007 appropriations bill, the agency was directed to request from the NRC an independent assessment of the ETDP. This interim report provides an assessment of each of the 22 projects including a quality rating, an analysis of how effectively the research is being carried out, and the degree to which the research is aligned with the VSE. To the extent possible, the identification and discussion of various cross-cutting issues are also presented. Those issues will be explored and discussed in more detail in the final report.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!