National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$12.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research: Third Edition (2009)
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP)

Citation Manager

. "Responding to Suspected Violations of Professional Standards." On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research: Third Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
23
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research, Third Edition

sponses of those individuals. It also is important to examine carefully one’s own motivations and biases, since others inevitably will do so.

Institutional policies generally divide investigations of suspected misconduct into an initial inquiry to gather information and a formal investigation to reach conclusions and decide on responses. These procedures are designed to take into account fairness for the accused, protection for the accuser, and coordination with funding agencies. A model for this process can be seen in the guidelines set by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity.

Page
23