National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$62.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

21st Century Innovation Systems for Japan and the United States: Lessons from a Decade of Change: Report of a Symposium (2009)
Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP)

Citation Manager

. "Technology Policies in Japan: 1990 to the Present--Akira Goto and Kazuyuki Motohashi." 21st Century Innovation Systems for Japan and the United States: Lessons from a Decade of Change: Report of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
30
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


21st Century Innovation Systems for Japan and the United States: Lessons from a Decade of Change - Report of a Symposium
FIGURE 1 GDP growth ratio.

FIGURE 1 GDP growth ratio.

SOURCE: K. Motohashi, Empirical Analysis of IT Innovation: Has IT Changed Long-term Japanese Economic Performance? Toyokeizai, 2005.

productivity did decline to some degree in the 1990s and that this decline was greater than one would expect even in years of low economic growth.

The natural question concerns why productivity declined in the 1990s and several experts have proposed answers. One possible cause is the misallocation of resources, or “unnatural selection”4; efficient firms exited while inefficient firms, or “zombies,” remained with the help of government and the banks, which wanted to prevent bankruptcies. Peck, Levin, and Goto (1988) show that this has happened in the past.

Another popular explanation, held mostly by management theorists, business people, and policy makers, is the reduced technological capability of the Japanese firms.5 They contend that still-high R&D expenditures in the 1990s seem not to have produced the new products and processes that would have generated profits. The large market share once held by technology-intensive Japanese industries

4

See Peek and Rosengren (2005) and Nishimura et al. (2003).

5

See, for instance, Porter and Sakakibara (2004).

Page
30
Front Matter (R1-R18)
I INTRODUCTION (1-2)
Introduction: The Chrysanthemum Meets the Eagle: The Co-evolution of Innovation Policies in Japan and the United States--Sadao Nagaoka and Kenneth Flamm (3-18)
II OVERVIEW (19-20)
Overview--Sadao Nagaoka, Kenneth Flamm, and Masayuki Kondo (21-26)
III SYMPOSIUM PAPERS (27-28)
Technology Policies in Japan: 1990 to the Present--Akira Goto and Kazuyuki Motohashi (29-39)
Reform of University Research System in Japan: Where Do They Stand?--Ryuji Shimoda (40-56)
Government's Evolving Role in Supporting Corporate R&D in the United States: Theory, Practice, and Results in the Advanced Technology Program--Stephanie Shipp and Marc Stanley (57-76)
Government Programs to Encourage Innovation by Startups & SMEs: The Role of Innovation Awards--Charles W. Wessner (77-94)
Programs to Stimulate Startups and Entrepreneurship in Japan: Experiences and Lessons--Takehiko Yasuda (95-107)
Economic Impacts of International R&D Coordination: SEMATECH and the International Technology Roadmap--Kenneth Flamm (108-125)
Semiconductor Consortia in Japan: Experiences and Lessons for the Future--Shuzo Fujimura (126-137)
Issues in and Possible Reforms of the U.S. Patent System--Bronwyn H. Hall (138-152)
Reform of Patent System in Japan and Challenges--Sadao Nagaoka (153-168)
Industry-University R&D Partnerships in the United States--Irwin Feller (169-185)
University-Industry Partnerships in Japan--Masayuki Kondo (186-205)
The Connected Science Model for Innovation - The DARPA Role--William B. Bonvillian (206-237)
Public-Private Linkage in Biomedical Research in Japan: Lessons of the 1990s--Yosuke Okada, Kenta Nakamura, and Akira Tohei (238-250)
IV APPENDIXES (251-252)
Appendix A: Symposium Agenda (253-259)
Appendix B: Bibliography (260-284)