. "Government's Evolving Role in Supporting Corporate R&D in the United States: Theory, Practice, and Results in the Advanced Technology Program--Stephanie Shipp and Marc Stanley." 21st Century Innovation Systems for Japan and the United States: Lessons from a Decade of Change: Report of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
21st Century Innovation Systems for Japan and the United States: Lessons from a Decade of Change - Report of a Symposium
Nadiri I. 1993. Innovations and Technological Spillovers. NBER Working Paper No. 4423. Boston, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Nail, John, and Hayden Brown. Forthcoming. Classifying and Analyzing ATP Projects Using the NorthAmerican Industry Classification System (NAICS). NISTIR 2005. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
National Research Council. 1999. The Advanced Technology Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Pelsoci, Thomas. 2003. Low-Cost Manufacturing Process Technology for Amorphous SiliconDetector Panels: Applications in Digital Mammography and Radiography. NIST GCR 03-844. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Pelsoci, Thomas. 2005. Photonic Technologies: Applications in Petroleum Refining, Building Controls,Emergency Medicine, and Industrial Materials Analysis. NIST GCR 05-879. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Polenske, Karen, Nicolas Rockler, and others. 2004. Closing the Competitive Gap: A RetrospectiveAnalysis of the ATP 2mm Project. NIST GCR 03-856. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Popkin, Joel. 2003. Inter-Industry Diffusion of Technology That Results from ATP Projects: Preliminary Research of the Potential Impacts of ATP Funding. NIST GCR 03-848. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Powell, Jeanne, and Francisco Moris. 2002. Different Timelines for Different Technologies. NISTIR 6917. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Ruegg, Rosalie, and Irwin Feller. 2003. A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment: Models,Methods, and Findings from ATP’s First Decade. NIST GCR 03-857. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Sakakibara, Mariko, and Lee Branstetter. 2002. Measuring the Impact of ATP-Funded ResearchConsortia on Research Productivity of Participating Firms, A Framework Using Both U.S. andJapanese Data. NIST GCR 02-830. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Shipp, Stephanie, Andrew Wang, Steve Campbell, Lorel Wisniewski, Kerry Levin, Jennifer O’Brien, and Westat. 2005. “Measuring Behavior Additionality in ATP Joint Venture Projects: Findings from the U.S. Advanced Technology Program.” Paper presented at OECD Workshop on Behavioral Additionality, Vienna, Austria, January 31-February 1, 2005.
Solomon Associates. 1993. The Advanced Technology Program: An Assessment of Short-TermImpacts: First Competition Participants. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2005. “The Ethical Economist.” Foreign Affairs Council on Foreign Affairs. November/December. Accessed at <http:www.foreignaffairs.org>.
U.S. Congress. 1988. Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-418, codified in 15 U.S.C. 278n.) and later amended by the American Technology Preeminence Act of 1991 (P.L. 102-245, codifies in 15 U.S.C. 3701).