The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2008a. Community Action for a Renewed Environment (CARE). Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/air/care/index.htm [accessed Jan. 29, 2008].
Evans, G.W. 2003. A multimethodological analysis of cumulative risk and allostatic load among rural children. Dev. Psychol. 39(5):924-933.
Evans, G.W., M. Bullinger, and S. Hygge. 1998. Chronic noise exposure and physiological response: A prospective study of children living under environmental stress. Psychol. Sci. 9(1):75-77.
Evans, J.S., S.K. Wolff, K. Phonboon, J.I. Levy, and K.R. Smith. 2002. Exposure efficiency: An idea whose time has come? Chemosphere 49(9):1075-1091.
Ezzati, M., S.V. Hoorn, A. Rodgers, A.D. Lopez, C.D. Mathers, and C.J. Murray. 2003. Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors. Lancet 362(9380):271-280.
Greenland, S. 1999. Relation of probability of causation to relative risk and doubling dose: A methodologic error that has become a social problem. Am. J. Public Health 89(8):1166-1169.
Greenland, S., and J.M. Robins. 1988. Conceptual problems in the definition and interpretation of attributable fractions. Am. J. Epidemiol. 128(6):1185-1197.
Greenland, S., and J.M. Robins. 2000. Epidemiology, justice and the probability of causation. Jurimetrics 40(3):321-340.
Hynes, H.P., and R. Lopez. 2007. Cumulative risk and a call for action in environmental justice communities. J. Health Disparities Res. Pract. 1(2):29-57.
IOM (Institute of Medicine). 1999. Toward Environmental Justice: Research, Education and Health Policy Needs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Israel, B.A., A.J. Schulz, E.A. Parker, and A.B. Becker. 1998. Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improving public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 19:173-202.
Israel, B.D. 1995. An environmental justice critique of risk assessment. New York U. Environ. Law J. 3(2):469-522.
Kaufman, J.S., and R.S. Cooper. 1999. Seeking causal explanations in social epidemiology. Am. J. Epidemiol. 150 (2):113-120.
Kuehn, R.R. 1996. The environmental justice implications of quantitative risk assessment. U. Illinois Law Rev. 1996(1):103-172.
Künzli, N., and I.B. Tager. 2005. Air pollution: From lung to heart. Swiss Med. Wkly. 135(47-48):697-702.
Kyle, A.D., J.R. Balmes, P.A. Buffler, and P.R. Lee. 2006. Integrating research, surveillance, and practice in environmental public health tracking. Environ. Health Perspect. 114(7):980-984.
Landis, W.G., and J.A. Wiegers. 1997. Design considerations and a suggested approach for regional and comparative ecological risk assessment. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 3(3):287-297.
Landis, W.G., M. Luxon, and L.R. Bodensteiner. 2000. Design of a relative risk model regional-scale risk assessment with conformational sampling for the Willamette and McKenzie Rivers, Oregon. Pp. 67-88 in Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment: Recent Achievements in Environmental Fate and Transport, Vol. 9., F.T. Prince, K.V. Brix, and N.K. Lane, eds. STP1381. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
Levy, J.I., S.M. Chemerynski, and J.L. Tuchmann. 2006. Incorporating concepts of inequality and inequity into health benefits analysis. Int. J. Equity Health 5:2.
McEwen, B.S. 1998. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N. Engl. J. Med. 338(3):171-179.
Menzie, C.A., M.M. MacDonell, and M. Mumtaz. 2007. A phased approach for assessing combined effects from multiple stressors. Environ. Health Perspect. 115(5):807-816.
Morello-Frosch, R., and B.M. Jesdale. 2006. Separate and unequal: Residential segregation and estimated cancer risks associated with ambient air toxics in U.S. metropolitan areas. Environ. Health Perspect. 114(3):386-393.