Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 1
Space Studies Board Search: Jump to Top NewsJump to Science in the Subscribe to our FREE e- Headlines newsletter! NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL June 18, 2004 Current Operating Status On NASA Mars Sample-Return Mission Options Membership Report Appendix On December 3, 1996, Dr. Ronald Greeley, chair of the Committee on Planetary and Lunar Exploration, and Dr. Claude R. Canizares, chair of the Space Studies Board, sent the following letter report to Dr. Jurgen Rahe, NASA's science program director for solar system exploration. In your letter of September 17, 1996, you requested that the Committee on Planetary and Lunar Exploration (COMPLEX) assess NASA's plans for Mars sample-return missions. COMPLEX understands that you need its remarks in early December to aid in policy decisions by the agency. As you requested, the assessment was conducted at COMPLEX's October 16-18, 1996, meeting held at the National Research Council's Georgetown offices. The assessment was based on "The Search for Evidence of Life on Mars," a working paper drafted by NASA's Mars Expeditions Strategy Group, guest lectures on the scientific goals for martian samples analyzed in laboratories on Earth, and presentations on NASA's four possible mission options. NASA's presentations emphasized that the exact sequence and details (e.g., payload mass and instrument complement of orbiters, and ranges and on-board analytical capabilities of rovers) of missions in all of the options are currently under development. Consequently, COMPLEX must defer a specific assessment of mission plans at this time. COMPLEX has, however, provided a general assessment based on recommendations made in previous National Research Council reports. As such, both COMPLEX and the Space Studies Board (SSB) regard this current document as one step in an iterative process that will continue with the evolution of NASA's planning for the implementation of Mars sample- return missions. As you know, COMPLEX and the SSB have consistently emphasized the importance of an intensive study of Mars by spacecraft. An important element of such a program is the return of martian samples to Earth. COMPLEX continues to http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ssb/msrmenu.html (1 of 2) [6/18/2004 9:26:04 AM]
OCR for page 1